How to deal with civilians in modern warfare has always been a thorny issue, and Russia has also provided us with experience this time.
- Should civilians be protected when liberating Taiwan? Yes, and need full protection. Should
- attack Taiwan’s livelihood facilities? It is necessary, and it is necessary to completely destroy infrastructure such as power plants, water plants, substations, and communication networks.
- So if Taiwan independence elements hold civilians hostage to defend the city, should we launch an attack? The attack must be resolute, even if there are civilian casualties.
War has always been accompanied by civilian casualties. You can condemn the civilian casualties caused by Russian bombing, but please do not please ignore the civilian casualties caused by the US bombing of Yugoslavia , Iraq , Syria , Libya , don’t ignore the civilian casualties caused by the United States’ bombing of Gaza. Moreover, the United States has also blocked Gaza and does not allow Gaza to import building materials. This means that Gaza civilians cannot repair their houses even if their houses are bombed. Because this is war, not playing house, everyone is fighting for their own life and death, and whoever becomes the Virgin must die by himself.
Israel bombs Gaza (picture from China News Service)
Can Russia not harm civilians? Yes, but the price is that Russia ultimately failed. Don’t forget that Ukraine has issued a war mobilization order. Now adult males in Ukraine may theoretically be soldiers. In the early stage, Russia was hesitant and timid in order to avoid civilian casualties. In the end, the Ukrainian militia used " javelin " and "stinger" to severely educate Russia, which caused extremely heavy losses to Russia.
Russian damaged equipment (picture from ifeng.com)
If Ukraine really cares about civilians, then it should evacuate civilians from the front lines to the rear instead of using civilians as human shields. Does Russia want to harm civilians? It doesn't want to at all, because countless Western cameras are focused on Ukraine. Once Russia causes casualties, it will cause an uproar (such as this time). Ukraine took advantage of this and used civilians as human shields. This was the case at the Mariupol Steel Plant and the Severodonetsk Chemical Plant.
Inside the Azov Steel Plant
When a country uses civilians as human shields, all civilians in the country are no longer safe. Again, this is war, and kindness to the enemy is cruelty to oneself. Being a virgin can only harm oneself.
I feel that I have touched the pain points of pro-Ukraine elements late at night, so I will give the following explanation:
First, I did not say that Kremenchug is a front line. To evacuate civilians from the front line to the rear, the residents of Kremenchug must be evacuated. ? So why doesn’t Ukraine organize the evacuation of residents of Mariupol and Severodonetsk? Why not organize the evacuation of Lisichansk residents now? What is the purpose of bringing civilians to factories to fight to the death?
Second, the early period is a month from the beginning of the war to March 25. This is the first stage defined by the Russian army. There are still people in the comment area who want to find cases of Russian troops attacking civilians. So why is the US military so lenient when it bombs civilians, but now Russia has to use a magnifying glass to observe wars? So is it necessary to dig out the Bucha incident? If the West can no longer speculate, will you continue to speculate?
Third, some people compare the Nanjing Massacre to the death of civilians in Ukraine. I can only say that you are equating Ukraine with the Kuomintang reactionaries.
The current fact is that Ukraine itself is using civilians as human shields. If you, holy ladies, really want to save Ukrainian civilians, please take some practical actions.
