The activities of the U.S. Navy CVN76 aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan are quite strange. The DDG65 USS Benford Aegis guided-missile destroyer, which is the vanguard of the USS Reagan aircraft carrier strike group, had already broken into the South China Sea on June 25, but the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier showed signs of It is active near Mariana Trench . The USS Ronald Reagan arrived at the Apra Naval Base in Guam on June 23 to begin a short-term rest. It is only one month away from its 2022 combat deployment. The USS Reagan aircraft carrier belongs to the seventh fleet of the US Pacific Navy and its home port is in Yokosuka, Japan. . In the early stages of the combat deployment of the USS Ronald Reagan, the US Navy also had the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier strike group CVN72 performing arrogant operations in the Asia-Pacific region. Currently, the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier is already near Hawaii.
Although the US aircraft carrier has not entered the South China Sea, the US Navy's Aegis guided missile destroyer and reconnaissance aircraft have broken into the South China Sea and started a series of actions. 202206304/Aviation Vision/AZ, according to air traffic control information on June 28, the US Navy EP-3E Aries II electronic reconnaissance aircraft broke into the South China Sea and approached the mouth of the strait. The US Navy has used warships to cross five times in 2022 Strait, including 4 Arleigh Burke-class Aegis guided-missile destroyers and 1 Ticonderoga-class Aegis guided-missile cruiser. In addition, the U.S. Navy also used 2 P-8A Sea King maritime anti-submarine patrol aircraft to conduct crossing operations. The U.S. Navy The intention is very clear, it is to test the bottom line.
Judging from the pattern of the U.S. Navy using warships to cross the Taiwan Strait, combined with the arrival of the EP-3E Aries II electronic reconnaissance aircraft at the mouth of the Taiwan Strait, aviation vision determines that the U.S. Navy's DDG65 Benford Aegis guided missile destroyer is likely to cross the Taiwan Strait again. Previously, The Aegis guided-missile destroyer DDG65 Benford has launched provocations, not only crossing the strait, but also trying to break into the 12-nautical-mile territorial waters of the South China Sea islands and reefs. When trying to break into the territorial waters, it was warned and warned by the PLA's naval and air forces. Drive away. The U.S. Navy often carries the so-called "freedom of navigation" and shows off its power at China's doorstep. The purpose of the U.S. military is very direct, which is to try to put pressure on China.
The U.S. Navy EP-3E Aries II electronic reconnaissance aircraft will not arrive at the mouth of the strait for no reason. This is to provide intelligence support to the U.S. Navy. According to ship information AIS signal data, the U.S. Navy also has a guided missile destroyer in The East China Sea carried out missions, thus forming a north-south pincer attack. At the same time, on June 28, the U.S. Air Force dispatched an RC-135V strategic reconnaissance aircraft to conduct reconnaissance in the East China Sea and Yellow Sea , thus providing the U.S. Navy DDG105 The Aegis guided-missile destroyer USS Dewey provides intelligence support. During the game between China and the United States, the United States continued to use the "Taiwan card" in an attempt to force China to make concessions through military pressure.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has previously publicly reiterated that the Taiwan Strait is not the so-called "international waters." This is a warning to the U.S. Navy. In the face of China's reiteration of the definition of the strait, the U.S. Navy has previously used P-8A Sea King maritime anti-submarine patrol aircraft to initiate crossings. In response to the challenge of the U.S. Navy, the People's Liberation Army used its sea and air forces to track and monitor the U.S. Navy's P-8A Sea King maritime anti-submarine patrol aircraft. In fact, the so-called "free navigation" in "international waters" hyped by the U.S. Navy is a "one-sided statement" by the U.S. military. International law There is no such thing as "international waters" at all. The U.S. Navy made up the so-called "international waters."
