Now it seems that some people are making a fuss about the shemale. Some people praise dogs as the emperor, and cherish dogs more filial and supportive than to mothers. This deformed social phenomenon has subverted people's perception and made many workers angry.
Some people's beloved dogs died, and the whole family wore mourning clothes and kept mourning for the dog for seven days, set up a mourning hall and hearing cart. Monks asked the dog to recite scriptures for three days and bury the dog with Nanmu coffin. A dog funeral cost 150,000 yuan. Is this really a respect for dogs as their ancestors? I think it is clear that it is a challenge to the working class in the whole society.
Now some dog lovers are becoming more and more extreme. They are not only personalizing dogs, or being a dog-like person, but also making trouble everywhere, and treating human rights as dog-rights. Dogs must enjoy what mortals want to enjoy, and dogs must also obtain what rights they can obtain. What is the reason for this?
Haven't you seen it, now farces can be seen everywhere: under the so-called equality banner of birth, people are in public places on parks and roads, and dogs also enjoy people's public welfare places. People take the elevator, and dogs are also taking the elevator. People have supermarkets, and dogs have supermarkets. People have hospitals, and dogs have hospitals. When people go to the restaurant to have dinner, dogs also have to serve the table and eat with others.
a few days ago, a female tourist took her husky to climb the mountain with her husky. She found that the husky was a little tired, so she hired two sedan chair bearers to carry the husky to climb the mountain.
makes people raise their dogs, and netizens are talking about this. The heroine said that she had money and would spend whatever she should do, and others would not care about it. But the sedan chair bearer said that in order to make money, it is the same to carry a person and a dog, and carrying a dog is easier than carrying a person. Don't block people from making money. This seems to be the case of Zhou Yu fighting Huanggai , one willing to fight and the other willing to be beaten, which is completely the case of market economy . But netizens couldn't accept it. Why?
Because human rights are not dog rights, dogs cannot enjoy all treatment of human rights . If a country cannot even distinguish between human rights and dog rights, then the country will be left to the dog to build.
Therefore, a certain legal definition should be given to the dog's rights. Dog lovers cannot act arbitrarily and cannot transcend the public moral red line. It is personal matter for you to close the door and eat, sleep, kiss and caress the dog, but all your behaviors of loving dogs are exposed to public places, that is a social problem, not your personal problem. All your behavior must comply with social moral norms. Just as sex is not allowed on the road, this is the norm.
Therefore, the country should put a tight curse on the dog in the form of law. Dogs cannot be allowed to violate human rights, such as dogs bite children and elderly people. Dogs cannot be allowed to occupy public facilities, such as dogs running on the road park and dogs taking elevators. Dogs cannot be allowed to occupy the dining table for hotel public people, and they are not allowed to take planes, trains, cars, subways and slide rods for people. [ The sedan chair owner wants to do a dog-carrying business, he should register to carry the dog specifically and not carry people. The public administration department should set the slider color and other logo props for the slider to show the difference between them and people. Otherwise, it will be a dog and a person, which will cause tourists all over the world to be insulted. When everyone needs to be cremated, a dog must not be buried in a coffin or a dog grave shall not be set up when he dies. The religious community shall not allow monks to recite scriptures for the dead dogs so-called salvation and release the flame mouth .
This means that Chinese society should be moral, and people and dogs should not be separated from each other, and people and dogs should be reversed. Dog lovers should not be bold and reckless. Dog rights should not replace human rights. Legislation and regulations should be established to set a red line for dogs that cannot be crossed.
