Beijing time on January 27, the NBA All-Star Weekend voting has ended. LeBron James got his wish and became the league's vote king again.
But at the same time, James and were not first in all the votes. He was first in only one of the three votes and second in both. This time he was able to be the vote king, in fact, mainly due to the strength of the fans, including Curry . Now the specific voting situation has been announced. James ranked second among the Western Conference forwards in the player voting, and also ranked second in the media voting. Only the fans voted first. Because the fan votes accounted for a relatively large proportion, there were too many fans who voted for him, so he became the top vote-getter.
Curry ranked second in player and media voting, and first in fan voting. They are invincible, but in the eyes of players and media experts, they no longer have the absolute top strength, so they were not voted for the first position. At the same time, what is intriguing is that the old stars in this voting were very low in the media votes, but some new stars were particularly high in the media votes. This shows that the American media is working hard to create stars and wants to create a group of new people to replace these old guys.
The most typical ones are these in the Eastern Conference. Who is ranked first in the Eastern backcourt media vote? Donovan Mitchell , who is second? Jaylen Brown , these two people are actually the top two in the media vote, can you believe it? What strength do they have to rank in the top two, or how can they surpass Harden Irving? Harden's media voting actually fell to 6th place. Reporters really hate Harden, experts really look down on Harden. Irving's media voting is also 4th, DeRozan 's media voting is 10th, and newcomer Haliburton's media voting is 3rd. But the media doesn't like to choose all these old superstars. They choose , Mitchell, and Jaylen Brown. These two are the top two. Why do they have strong power?
The same is true for the frontcourt of the Eastern Conference. Who is ranked first in the media vote? Tatum , this is also a typical example of star-making. The American media just wants to promote the so-called local American stars to usher in a new era, and wants to artificially update and drive away those old people. Durant 's media rating is fourth. You must know that Durant ranked second in player voting and fan voting, but only fourth in media voting. Isn't this enough to prove something? The media doesn't like him either.
The first place voted by the Western media is Luka Doncic , and Curry is second. That means Curry's popularity is indeed invincible, otherwise it would not work. In the media voting for the frontcourt position in the Western Conference, the first place is Jokic, who is also a 27-year-old young superstar in his prime. In other words, looking at the Eastern and Western media voting, the top two are Jaylen Brown, Mitchell, Tatum, Jokic, and Doncic. No one is older than 27 years old. This is the most direct evidence of the current forced modeling to win over the new generation.
Are these old stars not as good as these people? Can’t the media be blind and not see it? Are people like James, Curry, Durant, and Harden really inferior to them? If you form a team to play a game, the winner will definitely be Giankudu's team, but why are these people's media votes so high? The media votes of old stars have been artificially suppressed. It is just the result of their forced replacement. This vote is the best proof of this. Therefore, the league is now targeting some old stars and Curry himself. As long as he is not beaten to death, there will be no whistle. This makes sense, because they just don’t like you, and they just want to praise the new generation and those so-called new Nike brands.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-