After the disastrous defeat in the election, Tsai Ing-wen appointed former Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan as the convener of the "Review Failure Review Group" and convened a number of "review" meetings.

text | Chen Jingsheng

After the disastrous defeat in the election, Tsai Ing-wen appointed former Taoyuan Mayor Zheng Wencan as the convener of the "Review Failure Review Group" and convened a number of "review" meetings.

Now the review report has finally been released. It is worth noting that the only "war criminal" named in this report is the former Hsinchu mayor Lin Zhijian who was exposed in the paper plagiarism scandal. As for the others, not a word is mentioned!

Lin Zhijian became the only "war criminal" for the Democratic Progressive Party's defeat in the election

A few days ago, the review report of the Democratic Progressive Party's defeat in the election was officially released, and Zheng Wencan explained the content of the review to the outside world. Zheng Wencan pointed out that the reason why the DPP suffered such a disastrous defeat this time was mainly due to the following reasons: one was that the list of candidates was released late, which made integration difficult; the other was that there was insufficient communication power. In addition, he also pointed out that the impact of the epidemic, the black gold problem, and the deterioration of public security were also the main factors in losing the election.

It is worth noting that Zheng Wencan also specifically named Lin Zhijian, saying that his "essay scandal" incident failed to stop the bleeding in time, which caused the public's trust in the DPP to be shaken. And Lin Zhijian is also the only "war criminal" who was defeated in the election and was publicly named!

In response, Lin Zhijian first apologized to the public for the storm caused by his "essay scandal", and then defended himself. He said that running for mayor of Taoyuan was not in his life plan, but he agreed to run after the DPP Central Committee repeatedly persuaded him to do so.

’s remarks seemed to mean he was aggrieved. Obviously, Lin Zhijian was not satisfied that he was the only one who was defeated as a “war criminal”.

The Central Committee of the Democratic Progressive Party is indeed not innocent. Not to mention the recommendation of Lin Zhijian to run for election, after the Lin Zhijian paper plagiarism scandal was exposed, who ignored academic ethics and insisted on opposing National Taiwan University? Of course that is Tsai Ing-wen, the leader of the Democratic Progressive Party, but this election defeat review report does not mention Tsai Ing-wen or others at all, but only focuses on Lin Zhijian. No wonder Lin Zhijian wants to call himself "Qu"!

After losing the election, no one dared to criticize Tsai Ing-wen.

During her years in power, Tsai Ing-wen has led Taiwan into a continuous downward spiral. Economic and people's livelihood problems have been piling up, social security problems have become increasingly prominent, the political ecology of the country has also continued to deteriorate, and cross-strait relations have become increasingly tense and deadlocked. In this election, Tsai Ing-wen was so "dictatorial" that one person decided the Democratic Progressive Party's candidate list. After Lin Zhijian's "essay scandal" was exposed, he led the entire party to blindly support him.

It can be said that the biggest "war criminal" who caused the DPP's defeat was Tsai Ing-wen. Ironically, this report did not mention her at all. In fact, not only is this review report, but since the election results were exposed, few people in the DPP have directly opened fire on the culprit Tsai Ing-wen.

Although the Democratic Progressive Party does not dare to arrest Tsai Ing-wen, a "war criminal," the people on the island are sharp-eyed. Previous polls showed that when faced with the question of who was most responsible for the DPP's defeat in the election, about 7.9% of the respondents believed it was former epidemic prevention commander Chen Shizhong, and about 12.8% of the respondents believed it was Lin Zhijian. The number of respondents who thought it was Tsai Ing-wen accounted for 44.5%. This data is already very illustrative.

It can be seen that the DPP’s reflection on the election defeat is still superficial, without any reflection on the point, and does not care about the public opinion and public opinion. It only randomly arrests one person to "take the blame". If the DPP remains stubborn and continues to "pass the blame" before solving its own problems, then the people on the island will continue to use their votes to make them recognize the reality!

Copyright statement: This article is an original article by the author. The image data comes from the Internet. Unauthorized illegal reproduction of the text content of this article is strictly prohibited. If you need to reprint or quote, you must obtain the author's consent and indicate the source.