Yesterday's World Cup opening match perfectly interprets what it means to die if you are a big hit. When public opinion is one-sided, Qatar will win by relying on money ability, old cannon Ecuador withstood the baptism of sugar-coated cannonballs and cleanly beat the host 2:0 to the horse. How to say it, it is reasonable and unexpected. Qatar's host advantage and the title of Asian Cup championship mislead people's judgment and take it as a warning. Let's analyze today's three games: 1. England vs Iran. Qatar's defeat has increased people's vigilance. Lottery players have all started to suspicious mode. Given England's poor performance in the UEFA League this year, serious injuries, and the hard resistance of Iranian Asian teams, it has begun to affect people's judgment of this game. From the odds point of view, the odds of win, draw, loss, that does not allow the ball are 1.21 4.5 11.00. This odds are either England won cleanly or Iran won the game. If you want to win in a small single, you can. If you choose England to win in a regular manner, it is not recommended to single level or make a string, as the cost-effectiveness is too low. Conclusion: England won the big win.
2. Senegalese VS Netherlands . African teams have always been not very good in the World Cup, and this year they should not be able to escape the fate of team destruction. Mane 's absence has a huge impact on Senegal, so facing the low-key but powerful Netherlands, Senegal has almost no chance of winning. From the odds point of view, the Netherlands gave Senegal one goal, the normal water level, and the odds for not giving away the ball were 6.00, 3.65, 1.43. The balance compensation is too high, which is an inducement option. Conclusion: The Netherlands won a small victory.
3. United States VS Wales . The United States is a young army, and the Welsh lineup is aging. Many people think that Wales is in trouble in this game. In fact, this is an amplified error in the image of the United States in the hearts of fans. The United States' performance in the World Cup qualifiers can be described as stuttering, far less stable than Wales. Bell 's own competition attribute is Wales' biggest weapon. Conclusion: We are optimistic about Wales' unbeaten in this game. The above analysis of
is purely my random thoughts when I was squatting. It is really nonsense and does not constitute any lottery purchase or investment advice. If there are lottery purchase or investment behaviors, you will be responsible for the consequences!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-