Taiwan's United Daily News published a comment today, pointing out that although Ko Wen-je has no grace, he is dealing with a witch hunting game that comes from the "nine-in-one" election; some candidates are also "not prepared to do their homework" and only use the exaggerated w

Non-party Taipei City Councilman Lin Yingmeng asked Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je to sign a promise letter of "never surrender", but was scolded by Ko, "I don't want to pay attention to you" and "I care about you to die." Ke Wenzhe later criticized Lin Yingmeng for not preparing for municipal homework; and explained that he "treats with courtesy" to serious people and "passing on the spot" to fight against fishing. Taiwan's United Daily News published a comment today, pointing out that although Ko Wen-je has no grace, he is dealing with a witch hunting game that comes from 's "nine-in-one" election. Some candidates are also "not prepared for homework" and only use the exaggerated war of words to involve Taiwan in meaningless waste.

Taipei City Councilman Lin Yingmeng (first right), Taipei Mayor Ke Wen-je (second left)

　The "independence" group recently asked all public office candidates to sign a commitment letter to "defend Taiwan and never surrender", which is an example. Cross-strait, foreign affairs and defense policies are in charge of the DPP authorities, and they are exclusive to the powers of the leaders of Taiwan. If the leaders of Taiwan are not aware of dialogue and avoid war, and will push Taiwan to the front line by the international community, causing wars between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, but require local mayors to "defend Taiwan and never surrender", it is simply putting the cart before the horse.

　　The candidates of "Taiwan Funding" and members of the DPP "Yongyan Association" have signed promises of "never surrender". Compared to Ko Wen-je's blunt response to "Do you go and die", Democratic Progressive Party Taipei Mayor candidate Chen Shi-chung emphasized that being county mayor and heads of the Taiwan authorities are the same and never surrender. Although the "nine-in-one" election is a local election and has little to do with cross-strait, foreign affairs, and defense policies, the "independence faction" and the DPP still require county and city mayors and public office candidates to express their opinions on the grounds that the civil defense system is under local jurisdiction, and obviously use the "unification and independence" to engage in election mobilization, and use the election to engage in political hunting.

　　This kind of drama makes the campaign exaggerated and the meaning of the election vanished. It will be staged in New Taipei City in mid-August. The New Taipei City Councillor of the DPP surrounded Mayor 1 Hou Youyi and asked to sign a "Doing a Good Deed" statement, forcing Hou to promise that he would not run away to elect a leader in Taiwan after re-election. The Kuomintang city councillor responded to the DPP mayor candidate Lin Jialong, asking Lin to sign a promise letter to "not enter the cabinet after losing election." An election turned into a melee of "no running away when elected vs. no running away when not elected. no entry into the cabinet". It seems interesting, but it conceals the true meaning of the election.

　　The DPP locks up Hou Youyi as the strongest opponent in Taiwan's leadership election in 2024. In any case, Hou must tie Hou Youyi to death in New Taipei City. Therefore, Hou promises to "do it well and do it" after re-election. However, "election is out of the way" is a common cause of blue and green. The Kuomintang does have the "lost gene" referred to by the DPP. Zhu Lilun and and Han Kuo-yu are both examples. But looking at Lai Ching-te, Chen Shi-chung and Lin Zhijian, the DPP not only has the "general of losing" but also has a lot of records and double standards. In particular, the DPP is more skilled in elections and has fallen out of office before the end of its term, which gives greater room for operation for the "planning" of election battles and power layout.

　　Recently, Hou Youyi mentioned his courage to take responsibility in 2024, so he asked Lin Jialong to pick up a gun, calling Hou too politically calculating and greedy, and not being the mayor of New Taipei , and directly electing the leader of Taiwan. In fact, this should have been handed over to voters, otherwise the law could also be "amended" to prohibit "eat the inside and look at the outside" and avoid the "ruling party" from taking "cabinet" positions to deploy elections and lay out power. However, the DPP obviously wants to leave more room for power operation and wait for elections to use it as a political criticism.

　　It’s just that the DPP wants Hou Youyi to “election and not run away”, just like announcing Lin Jialong’s defeat, just like “Dugu Qiu’s defeat”. This is incredible for any political party, but it is in line with the political logic and "ruling" trajectory of the DPP. In the "League of Losers" after the election in 2018, Su Zhenchang, Chen Chimai, Lin Jialong and others occupied the Taiwan authorities. This time, Lin Jialong was originally determined to be in Taipei City, but he was thrown into New Taipei City. Tsai Ing-wen's layout is to protect Chen Shizhong in a private manner, and to restrain Hou Youyi in power and conspiracy. Lin Jialong was elected and made hard work when he was elected. What was hanging in front of him was Tsai Ing-wen's "picture of unsuccessful election and promotion". Therefore, the Kuomintang wanted him to "not enter the cabinet after he was elected."

　　But whether it is not surrender, not leaving or "going to the cabinet", the promise letters are flying everywhere, which only lets the exaggerated political saliva flood the election and provides the abuse of witch hunting. No wonder Ko Wenzhe brutally refused to sign the letter of commitment. Having said that, what if it is signed? That politician who "even gods dare to deceive" is still arrogant and arrogant!