Chen Shizhong went to Wanhua Longshan Temple to pay homage today. He expressed his so-called "sincere apology", but drove an innocent protester who was infamous and left the scene. Su Heng, a well-known young commentator in Taiwan, submitted a letter to Taiwan's China Times News Network, saying that it seems that this is what Chen Shizhong calls a "sincere apology". I apologize to you and drive you away. I apologized, what else do you want me to do? You dare to protest! This is Chen Shizhong's attitude today.
The article pointed out that why there was a breakthrough in epidemic prevention last year was not because of the "legislator" of the DPP, Fan Yun, requesting the relaxation of Taiwan's entry epidemic prevention measures, namely the so-called 3+11, or because of the "indulgence" of the Taoyuan Municipal Government, where Taoyuan Airport , was located, on entry management.
The article said that in order to rescue Fan Yun and Zheng Wencan , Chen Shizhong said that Wanhua was a "breakthrough in epidemic prevention", and ignored the feelings of Wanhua residents, which made the people of Wanhua bear stigma and infamy for more than a year. It also cooperates with the DPP to release the so-called "all Taiwan is with Taipei to be imprisoned" such as irresponsible, ignoring the facts, seriously stigmatizing Taipei City, and seriously injuring Taipei citizens! Now, he said "sincerely apologize"! Strangely, will you not apologize when you were in office as "Minister of Health and Welfare"? Or you won’t apologize if you don’t have elections, and you won’t apologize if you don’t have elections to the mayor of Taipei?
The article criticized that in Chen Shizhong's eyes, epidemic prevention is also divided into different levels. The best one is the DPP Central Committee, followed by the DPP local government, and finally the counties and cities and ordinary people that are not "ruled" by the DPP. The DPP’s “ruling” counties and cities should have quick screening, vaccine, vaccine, PCR screening stations should have screening stations. Counties and cities that are not “ruling” in the DPP, there is nothing to do, and local governments should not buy vaccines themselves!
The article stated that Taiwanese people want a healthy and stable living environment, rather than an environment where they may get infected with the epidemic and lose their lives and relatives and friends at any time. Taiwan is surrounded by the sea. In fact, as long as it keeps the entry barrier, the epidemic in Taiwan is very easy to control. However, under the epidemic prevention policy of Chen Shizhong of the DPP, more than 8,000 people in Taiwan died due to the epidemic. Has Chen Shizhong apologized to these families who lost their loved ones?
The article questioned, if it weren't for the election, would Chen Shizhong apologize? If it weren't for Wanhua being a district in Taipei City, would Chen Shizhong apologize? If Chen Shizhong really apologized sincerely, why didn’t he see Chen Shizhong apologize to the more than 8,000 people who lost their lives? Why didn’t Taiwan’s epidemic prevention break through because of the protection of the DPP’s officials and officials, and let “the people of Taiwan go to jail with Chen Shizhong” and apologize to the people of Taiwan?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-