Boil beans and burn the bean pods, and the beans cry in the pot; they are originally grown in the same root, so why not fry them too quickly? These classic verses from Cao Zhi " Seven-step Poems " have now become the best golden sentences to describe the military conflict between Ukraine and Russia. These two countries, which are both established by the Eastern Slavic nation and are also dominated by Orthodox religion, should not have developed into today's situation of fighting and killing each other after the disintegration of the Soviet Union's Franchise Republic in the 1990s. However, this seemingly accidental war between the Eastern Slavic nations is indispensable behind the secret provocation and fanning the flames of the United States and Western forces. As the Russian War continues, this war has increasingly shown the attributes of the US proxy war. The US government's eight-year secret trip to Chen Cang since the Crimean crisis in 2014 finally transformed the seemingly pitiful, weak and helpless Ukraine into a "Russian cemetery."
According to the latest report from Deutsche Welle (DW) on April 15, in order to break the stalemate between the Russian army and the Ukrainian army around the Ukrainian capital Kiev , Russia announced for the first time on March 30 that it would shift its strategic focus to eastern Ukraine. However, even so, the Russian army's combat against Ukraine still did not get the results it deserved, and even lost the flagship "Moskva" of the Black Sea Fleet on April 14. If there is no "indirect output" from the United States and the West behind this matter, even Western media would not believe it.
1, Russian "Moscow" mysteriously sank, and the "indirect output" of the US military is indispensable.
As the saying goes, guns are easy to avoid, and hidden arrows are difficult to defend. In the recent new round of military conflicts between Ukraine and Russia, Western media only reported on the open guns of the Ukraine and Russia, but did not mention the secret arrows issued by the United States and Europe. This is not only out of considerations for the political interests of the West, but also unwilling to reveal the "unspeakable secret" that the United States has long built Ukraine into a "Russian cemetery." Against this political background, the content of the reports given by Western media is not only ambiguous and confusing, but most of them are also stuck at the level of accusing the Russian army of "inhumane treatment" of the Ukrainian people, and has become a political tool for spreading fake news.
Regarding the recent news of the mysterious sinking of the Black Sea Fleet flagship "Moscow", Western media led by Deutsche News Agency (DPA), AFP (AFP), and AAP (AP), the statement given by the Western media is that the ship was sunk by the Ukrainian missile Neptune. However, as to how the Ukrainian military discovered and locked in this flagship that was mainly protected by the Russian fleet, they changed their previous exploration spirit and only focused on the political significance brought by the Ukrainian military's major victory. Among them, some media claimed in a report on April 15 that the Russian Navy's proud missile cruiser "Moscow" was sunk. This loss has a heavy blow to Russia in both its operational and symbolic significance, and it also has serious consequences for Russia's ability to unify the Black Sea .
So the question is, looking at the whole world, which country has the ability to accurately locate Russian main force missile cruiser on the Black Sea and kill it with one blow? I'm afraid even ordinary people can easily guess that the mastermind behind it is the US authorities. As the first ship of the Glorious Class missile cruiser under the Russian Navy and the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet, the "Moscow" has extremely strong regional air defense capabilities and can achieve seamless connection between the three layers of far, medium and near. The ship's air defense combat system mainly includes 8 "Thunder" SA-N-6 missile launch devices (ship-based type of S-300), 2 dual SA-N-4 "Gecko" missile launch devices, 6 AK630 6-barrel 30mm guns and electronic countermeasures systems, etc. Even in the face of the Ukrainian military's anti-ship missile attack, it is not powerless to resist. If there is not enough warhead equivalent and saturation strike capability, it is not easy to sink the sea giant with a displacement of 12,490 tons and a length of 186.4 meters at one time.
It is well known that once a lie is told, more lies have to be made up to make up for the previous lies. Western media are obviously very clear about the harm of "lying" and will briefly report on the sinking of the "Moscow" and point out that the news was obtained from the "official" of the Ukrainian government and was recognized as "reliable intelligence" by the Pentagon of the United States.
As early as April 13, the Ukrainian government issued a statement saying that the "Moscow" was accurately hit after the Ukrainian military used several TB2 drones as bait to attract the attention of its radar . Subsequently, the cruiser, , was believed to have exploded on the sea surface 60 to 65 nautical miles south of the Ukrainian city of Odessa, and then overturned and sunk on April 14 after losing its stability during the drag and rescue process. This entire attack process seems funny and funny to the outside world. If the facts are as described by the Ukrainian authorities, then this will undoubtedly become a "classic example in the history of modern naval warfare." Because of this type of ship that has large tonnage, high-end and sophisticated, and also has anti-ship, air defense and anti- missile capabilities, only Russia, the United States, China, Japan, and South Korea owned it. France and other Western countries navies do not have the corresponding ship . However, no matter what the truth is, the "Moscow" has become the largest tonnage warship that was sunk after the end of World War II.
In combination with the news that the Ukrainian General Staff, deputy commander of the Russian Navy's Black Sea Fleet and first-class captain Andrei Nikolayevich Paly was "liquidated" by the Ukrainian armed forces, which was previously announced by the Ukrainian General Staff on March 20, we can't help but be amazed at the "magnificent powers" of the Ukrainian military. We have long experienced such a clean and neat "beheading operation" in the US military's previous terrorist attacks on top Iranian leaders. The recent so-called "precise pulling" of the Ukrainian military against senior Russian generals has almost no exception. After all, in the name of the Ukrainian military, attacking its old rivals is the best way for the United States to maximize its benefits at the lowest cost.
2. The United States secretly "militarized" the Ukrainian army, indirectly "fighted" with the Russian army.
As the saying goes, something strange must be true. Recently, a series of " emergencies " that occurred in Ukraine and on the Black Sea are not as simple as it seems. It is more like a combination of punches launched by the United States and NATO to achieve the "great cause of anti-Russia". Why have at least seven senior Russian generals been confirmed to be "dead" on the Ukrainian battlefield after Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the implementation of a "special military operation" against Ukraine on February 24?
I'm afraid the US military has long used the technology to lock in the Russian flagship to hunt down Russian officers, including Major General Mohamed Tushayev, commander of the 141st Special Motorized Regiment of the Guards, Major General Andrei Sukhovitsky, deputy commander of the 41st Russian Army, Major General Vitali Gerasimov, commander of the 8th Russian Army in southern Russia, Lieutenant General Andrei Moldevichev, commander of the 29th Army in the Eastern Military Region, Major General Oleg Miteyev, commander of the 150th Motorized Infantry Division, and Lieutenant General Yakov Rezanttsev, commander of the 9th Army in southern Russia. This battle loss ratio is extremely rare in previous wars.
According to the figures given by the BBC (BBC), as of April 5, the total number of casualties reported by local governments in Russia was 1,083, and 217 were officers, with ranks ranging from second lieutenant to general, accounting for 20% of the Russian soldiers who died in battle. But it is worth mentioning that the proportion of officers in this set of numbers does not mean that one in every five Russian soldiers is an officer.In response, analyst Cranny Evans, Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) Analysis points out: "In the army of NATO countries, many combat tasks on the battlefield are authorized to sergeants, corporals and other subordinate officers. But in the Russian army, only officers above the lieutenant level can make decisions of the same level. Russian officers are responsible for tactical command and training of platoon-level or battalion-level units. Sergeants in the Russian army are usually only responsible for equipment or obeying orders from superiors, that is, they do not command any soldiers. This means that officers are forced to undertake more Command function. Therefore, Russian officers are more likely to die in battle than officers of many other armies. According to tradition, the bodies of Russian commanders who died will be transported back to their hometowns first, and the authorities are more likely to publicly announce their deaths. "
Why did Russia see a large number of high-level generals killed in the two months of the "special military operation"? In addition to Russian officers often commanding operations on the front line, it is obviously indispensable for intelligence support provided by the US military. For the United States, nothing is more effective than directly eliminating the Russian senior commanders to attack its morale. Under such a strategic policy, whether it is the fall of the top leaders of the Russian Army and Navy, or the sinking of the flagship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, it is not a coincidence but intentional.
In fact, in order to achieve such a strategic goal, the US military began to secretly strengthen its "linkage" with the Ukrainian military as early as after the Crimean crisis in 2014, including providing military supplies reserves for the Ukrainian military in advance, training Ukrainian soldiers to be familiar with NATO equipment, and guiding them to formulate effective tactics against the Russian military's combat style. This explains to a certain extent why the Ukrainian military had successfully obtained and mastered the use of these NATO weapons as soon as the Biden administration announced the provision of certain types of military weapons to Ukraine. In this way, the war will happen wherever the US military’s weapons are placed. Angry Emperor Putin to force him to send troops to Ukraine is very likely a “routine” that the United States and Ukraine have long planned.
In the ever-changing and extremely chaotic battlefield environment, the Ukrainian military can still respond calmly when it is suppressed by Russian electric warfare troops and attacked by air forces, and accurately lock and strike Russian senior personnel, armor, fighter jets, and warships. It is also indispensable for the intelligence support of the US military and the strong help of American technology companies. According to reports from Al Jazeera on April 14, US President Joe Biden has announced that after a call with Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky on Wednesday (April 13), it announced that it would provide Ukraine with additional military aid of US$800 million, including artillery systems, shells and armored personnel carriers. Regarding such a shiny military aid, Biden said: "This new package of aid will contain many efficient weapons systems and we have provided new capabilities to adapt to the broader attacks we expect Russia to launch in eastern Ukraine. The United States and its allies and partners provide a stable supply of weapons to Ukraine, which is crucial to maintaining its fight against Russian invasion. These aids make (Russian President Vladimir) Putin failed to achieve his goal of seizing and controlling Ukraine. Now we cannot stand by. I told Zelensky that the United States will continue to support the freedom war of the Ukrainian people. "
As soon as the news came out, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov (Dmitry Peskov) responded immediately and said: "We flatly disagree that any attempt to distort the situation in this way is unacceptable." Obviously, Biden's extremely "generous" military aid to Ukraine is not just to defend the "democracy and freedom" of the Ukrainian people.
Ukraine-Ukraine-Ukraine-Russian War has become a proxy war in the United States. It is terrifying to think about it for eight years. From fanning the flames before the war to putting fires in handing to putting fires in hand, the United States has achieved the evil purpose of using the Ukrainian situation to kill the East Slavic nations and weakening Russia's national strength.Especially after the large landing ship of the Russian Black Sea Fleet flagship Orsk and the Moscow missile cruiser sank one after another on March 25 and April 14, the US military's support for the Ukrainian government has become increasingly blatant, and even suspected of direct participation. In response to this, the extremely pro-US Western media are also actively carrying out work to weaken the morale of the Russian army and guide international public opinion. The media also declared: " Moscow has undoubtedly suffered a shocking blow recently. After unexpectedly abandoning absolute control of Ukrainian airspace and showing major tactical and strategic weaknesses in the first few weeks of its ground operations, the Russian Navy has also suffered a fatal blow."
At the same time, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson also promised to provide Ukraine with "harpoon" anti-ship missiles when he visited Kiev last Saturday (April 9), intending to turn Ukraine into a "testing ground" for Western weapons. In response to the loss of the Black Sea Fleet, Moscow has launched a military strike at a factory outside the Ukrainian capital Kiev, a few hours after admitting that the fleet's flagship explosion sank. At the same time, the Russian Ministry of Defense also issued a warning: "If Ukraine really targets Russian territory, the Russian military's military strike on Kiev will be even more fierce." Facts have proved that this loss from the Black Sea Fleet will not change the course of the Ukraine-Russian war, nor will it change the huge gap in military strength between Ukraine and Russia.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-