After the Japanese government decided to discharge nuclear polluted water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the sea last month, neighboring countries and the international community have condemned it, and calls for Japan to take responsibility are endless. On Ap

Source: Global Information Broadcast

After the Japanese government decided to discharge nuclear polluted water from the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant into the sea last month, neighboring countries and the international community condemned it, and calls for Japan to take responsibility are endless.

△On April 26, local time, 200 South Korean fishing boats gathered in front of the famous anti-Japanese generals to protest against Japan's decision to discharge water from the sea.

However, with general doubts and opposition from all parties, Japan's "humble" behavior from enterprises to government has also become more and more serious.

conceals, accidents, conceal them again... Japan's nuclear safety issues frequently occur

Japan's Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tongdai) recently admitted that the gel-like object found on the ground of Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant was indeed caused by leakage of radioactive waste, and some of the leaks may have entered the sea with the rainwater.

In fact, as early as March, TD.com staff discovered the problem, but it was not until two months later that TD.com finally admitted that there was indeed a leak. The price of delay in the past two months is that "partial leaks may have entered the sea." Even though the problem was so serious, TDD still believed that the leakage accident "had no impact on the environment."

△Japanese " Asahi Shimbun " report screenshot

In this regard, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian pointed out that similar situations have occurred in TD. Tampering with data and hiding risks seems to be their first choice, and they always have to wait until they can't hide it anymore before they can barely admit it. No matter how shocking the result is, it is simply attributed to "negligence". Such a company is responsible for the handling of Fukushima nuclear accident , which is a major issue related to the global ecological environment and human health, which has to worry.

△ Zhao Lijian

This is indeed the case. So far, TD.com has had many records of concealing false reports and tampering with information.

Public reports show that TD.com admitted in 2007 that TD.com had tampered with detection data and concealed reactor failures in 199 routine inspections such as Fukushima I and II nuclear power plants since 1977. In the follow-up handling of the Fukushima nuclear accident, Tektronix also responded slowly. In August 2013, under public doubts, TD.com admitted that about 300 tons of high-concentration nuclear-polluted water leaked out of the steel trough, and some of it may have leaked into Pacific .

△Japan Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tong Power) headquarters building

A brief review of the history of Japan's nuclear industry will find that the Japanese nuclear power industry has repeatedly ignored, concealed late reporting and done nothing about nuclear safety issues for decades.

Take the Fukui Prefecture Mihain Nuclear Power Plant as an example. The nuclear power plant had accidents in 1973 and 1991, but the Kansai Electric Power Company , which manages the nuclear power plant, chose to conceal and did not take substantial actions. As a result, another serious accident occurred in 2004, resulting in 5 deaths and 7 injuries. This accident is also the first time that a nuclear power plant in Japan has suffered a loss of life.

△Mibin Nuclear Power Station

Kansai Electric Power is not an exception. According to statistics, in the past 30 years from 1978 to 2006, dozens of accidents of varying levels have occurred in major nuclear power plants in Japan, but most nuclear power plants have chosen to conceal and not report afterwards. For example, in 1998, the Shiga Nuclear Power Plant of Hokuriku Power and the Hamaoka Nuclear Power Plant of Central Power in 1991, both had control rods removed, but they were not reported until many years later.

"It's unwise to use one problem to create more problems"

Not only enterprises, but the "disgracefulness" of the Japanese government has even more worrying the international community. And this kind of "innocence" first hits Japan's own face.

After the Japanese government decided to discharge nuclear-polluted water from the sea, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Taro Aso insisted that "that water is fine if you drink it."Such amazing remarks have caused painful criticism from the international community and the mockery of netizens from all over the world. Many people directly shouted: "Asoo Sang, drink one in front of everyone!"

△ Aso Taro

△ Japanese netizens: "Asoo Sang, drink one in front of everyone!"

local media "City Observation" in Los Angeles, USA published a comment article, mocking Aso in the way of "righteous and negative": Since Japan has publicly claimed that the nuclear-contaminated water processed is harmless, they can leave it for themselves, including "drinking it".

△ "City Watch" report screenshot

article "suggestions" that these water can be injected into many reservoirs in Japan for flood control, water supply, power generation and irrigation of crops. "The larger the reservoir, the better the dilution effect." And the Japanese people should not mind doing this, because the Japanese government and the United States have assured the world that "don't worry, it's safe."

△City Watch (city watch) report screenshot

Recently, Japanese Prime Minister Suka Yoshihide gave another instruction on the issue of nuclear pollution water discharge, saying that Tektronix and other relevant parties should try their best to gain the understanding of local and nationals in Fukushima, and at the same time deal with the problem of "image damage".

△Suka Yoshihide

However, the desire to repair the image may be difficult to realize, because TEC and the Japanese government have made a plan of "how cheaper it is possible" from the very beginning to deal with the issue of nuclear pollution water.

Japan's largest English-language newspaper, The Japan Times, reported that the Japanese public has sufficient reason to distrust the government, especially after Tektronix responded poorly and insisted on "one-sided" reasons that nuclear-polluted water had no more storage space.

report quoted Japanese nuclear reactor expert Hiroaki Oi as saying that the only way to solve the problem of nuclear polluted water is to establish a concrete enclosure around the damaged reactor, but TD shareholders have been delaying due to cost issues. In fact, their nuclear-polluting water discharge plan has always followed the principle of "money first".

△The Japan Times report screenshot

Report said that TEC, the Japanese government and Japanese media need to do more to alleviate public fears and doubts, "But so far, their work has been done a bad job."

△The report screenshot of the Japan Times report

International public opinion generally believes that in the issue of nuclear pollution water treatment, Japan is smart and mistaken for taking advantage of small gains.

The Korea Times published a commentary article pointing out that it is extremely unwise to use the problem of nuclear contaminated water to create more problems. It is not impossible for Japan to build more water storage facilities, which is "much lower than losing elections, undermining energy policies or causing international conflicts with neighboring countries."

△Screenshot of the Korean Times report

What is also cold to the Japanese government's "disgracefulness" is the typical "double standard" practice of the United States warning of imported Japanese food while openly supporting Japan's decision to clear the sea. South Korea, as an ally, was also very angry about this.

South Korean Foreign Minister Zheng Yiyong said last month that only the United States has a positive attitude towards Japan's decision to discharge water from nuclear pollution. Therefore, the South Korean government requires the United States to provide relevant scientific basis to the South Korean side to help judge whether Japan's decision is transparent and meets global security standards.

△Zheng Yirong

American marine expert and former University of Alaska professor Rick Steiner recently pointed out that Japan's statement that nuclear pollution water discharge from the sea has little threat to the ecological environment and human health is "very doubtful", " Biden government must urge Japan to abandon this unnecessary and dangerous plan."

△Screenshot of the Korean Times report

Planning丨Wang Jian

Written by Huang Biao

Editor丨Lin Wei Shan Lijuan

Signed by Liu Peng Wang Jian

Producer 丨Guan Juanjuan

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000