According to recent reports from the US media, critic John Fehry published an article entitled "Biden has no trade agenda", pointing out that Biden is "brave" in the face of China, and commented that "this is very good", but the tone changed and pointed out that doing so "is also very expensive." This article does not believe that it is wrong to treat China hard, but at the same time, the United States is continuing to engage in trade protectionism , and Biden is precisely a " protectionism person", so he has become more and more serious about closing the trade door and has no agenda to promote trade.
In comparison, the last president Trump Although he launched a trade war against China, he has done some things in other countries, such as reaching a trade agreement with South Korea. Now that domestic prices in the United States have risen sharply, many jobs are lost because the United States is actively breaking away from international trade, but the prosperous international trade will not stop because of the United States' withdrawal. This year, there was a "House Man in Cold War" and the last leader of the Soviet Union, Gorbachev, died, and Biden, like Gorbachev, was a "House Man in Cold War". Just like Biden's current rigid thinking and self-righteousness, Gorbachev also brought the Soviet Union to a dead end.
For example, according to historians, the Star Wars (SDI ) plan of Reagan did not scare Gorbachev, and concluded: "The United States expects us to build an equally expensive system like SDI, and hopes that they will use their technological advantages to win the race. But our scientists told me that if we want to destroy or offset the American SDI system, we only need to spend one tenth of the American plan to spend." Contrary to increasing investment in new weapons, the Soviets were actually in the process of cutting.
In the mid-1980s, the US CIA revised estimates for Soviet weapons procurement expenditures showed that the actual annual growth rate was only a trivial 1.3%, rather than the four to five percent reported by the CIA to the president, and the Soviets' allocation to offensive strategic weapons actually fell by 40%. For Defense Secretary Weinberg, these estimates were unacceptable on ideological , so he returned it to the CIA. There, the director Gates "ordered the Soviet Analytical Office to send a memorandum to Weinberg, focusing on the economic strength of the Soviet Union."
In fact, US intelligence agency did not see that the Soviet crisis was coming, nor did he provide an accurate valuation for political leaders regarding the initiatives taken by Gorbachev. In August 1991, the Soviet Union was eventually crushed by a domestic coup because of an internal loss of legitimacy initiated by Gorbachev himself. The United States had almost nothing to do with it, but it put the medal of the "Victor of the Cold War" on its chest until China's rise in recent years. Text/PY
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-