(History of the capital of Ukraine, , Kiev, , was attacked by the Russian military's missile ,
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict escalated again!
Putin th thunder was angry.
Russia exploded and fired more than 3,100 missiles and attacked many targets in Ukraine, including Ukrainian President Zelensky's office, and he is currently indestructible.
According to the current Ukrainian media reports, the Russian missile counterattack has caused hundreds of casualties in Ukraine.
And this is the strong counterattack made by Putin on Ukraine's side to blow up Crimea Bridge . At the same time, he also admitted that the Russian army used high-precision weapons to carry out large-scale precise strikes on many civil infrastructure in Ukraine.
You should know that combat nation is unwilling to suffer losses, and he is even more unwilling to avenge overnight .
As the conflict between Russia and Ukraine continues to escalate, will Ukraine still dare to continue to attack Russian territory?
The answer is that it is very likely to dare to attack.
Ukraine may have the following reasons for doing this:
First, The United States and other Western countries have made a voice to support Ukraine, and at the same time condemn Russia, giving Ukraine a "public opinion advantage." After the
incident, Ukraine immediately condemned Russia's "terrorist act". Many Western countries have unanimously agreed to unify their opinions, believing that this is a "terrorist attack" by Russia on Ukraine.
Among them, US Secretary of State Blinken directly condemned the Russian strike against Ukraine as a "terrorist attack."
collective voices from these countries can make Ukraine realize that it has a "public opinion advantage." To put it bluntly, means that Ukraine packages itself as a "victim", not a "violent perpetrator".
When Ukraine raided the Crimean Bridge, why didn’t Western countries collectively condemn Ukraine?
Are they stuck in their food and unable to speak out?
Just imagine, will Ukraine, which has "public opinion advantage", take the opportunity to attack Russia?
Second, Military aid given by Western countries gives them confidence in attack.
The United States and NATO Many countries have provided Ukraine with a large amount of military aid, among which the United States has the most powerful military aid.
In addition to providing Ukraine with 8 sets of national advanced surface-to-air missile system (NASAMS), "stinger" air defense missiles and "javelin" anti-tank missiles, the United States also assisted Ukraine with defensive weapons such as 16 Himas rocket launcher system , 126 155mm howitzers and thousands of drones.
Among them, NASAMS can intercept incoming targets outside 160 kilometers with its excellent performance. Its interception range is slightly stronger than my country's Hongqi-9A medium- and long-range air defense missile (125 kilometers), but slightly weaker than Hongqi-9B (more than 200 kilometers).
and Himas rocket launcher made the Russian army very troubled. It is said that the Russian army used "caliber" missiles to specifically attack it.
Haimas is the main force of the United States' active rocket launcher . It has extremely strong maneuverability and strong combat power.
It can not only launch rocket to strike targets of 70 kilometers away from , but also launch tactical missile to strike targets of 300 kilometers away from .
If it is deployed on the front line, it will definitely be a big threat to Russia.
Haimas was once suspected to be deployed in Zaporoze area. If it launches tactical missiles, it can even strike the Crimean Bridge.
With the US government's style of doing things, coupled with Zelensky's request for military aid to Western countries, perhaps the United States will continue to assist Ukrainian Himas rocket launcher in the future.
After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukraine conflict, Germany announced that it had provided Ukraine with an IRIS-T missile defense system. With its excellent radar detection capabilities, it can detect incoming fighter jets and missiles outside 40 kilometers , and can launch interceptor missiles in time to intercept.
Although Ukraine's navy and air force were almost completely destroyed in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, their army has significantly enhanced its strength and "both offensive and defensive" after receiving military assistance, so they have the confidence to challenge Russia.
Third, Ukrainian has excellent penetration ability.
Russia determines that the bombing of the Crimea Bridge was a "terrorist operation" planned by the Ukrainian side.
We can see from this that the Ukrainian army used its excellent penetration capabilities to blow up the Crimea Point Bridge under Russia's 20-layer defense system.
Although Ukraine's operation did not completely destroy the bridge, it also showed Russia and the world their strong penetration capabilities.
and this is also one of their important capabilities to attack Russian territory.
The fourth, Ukraine has to do such a thing.
This is an arrow on the string that has to be fired.
After the outbreak of the Russian-Ukraine conflict, Ukraine completely turned to Western countries, which means it is difficult for Russia and Ukraine to reconcile.
Ukraine's economy is currently facing collapse and can only be maintained by continuous blood transfusions from Western countries.
Ukraine wants them to transfusion blood, so it can only do it according to the requirements of Western countries. It is something that Ukraine has to do to find bad luck for Russia.
If Ukraine really continues to attack Russia's territory, what Russian territories will it attack?
The territory that Ukraine is likely to attack was not long ago, , 4 states in eastern Ukraine, which joined Russia through a referendum.
and and the territory of the Russian Federation, Ukraine will most likely not attack.
Some people ask, these places are currently Russian territory, why is there such a big gap?
We can understand that Russia has different attitudes towards these territories.
We can get relevant information from the Russian counterattack.
Russia attaches more importance to the Crimean Peninsula.
This time Putin ordered a missile strike on Ukraine because they touched Russia's counterscale.
However, Putin once warned Ukraine not to continue launching attacks on Russian federal territory.
You can understand that Putin has set a combat scope for Ukraine.
If Ukraine controls the war in the eastern Ukraine and the conflict is fierce, then Russia is more likely to accept it.
If Ukraine leads the war to other Russian territories, it is estimated that Russia will make Ukraine unable to bear it.
The United States is the mastermind behind the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. Will they personally send troops to participate in the war when the conflict escalates?
Judging from the current situation, the United States is likely to not send troops to participate in the war in person.
There are several reasons why they don't do this.
One, The United States is only willing to fight a "agent war".
Former US Army Chief of Staff Keane once confirmed to the outside world in an interview that the United States wants to fight a "agent war" in Ukraine.
They can create an enemy for Russia with a little money (more than 66 billion US dollars) and weaken Russia. Why do they have to end up on their own?
Secondly, fights face to face with Russia, which is not cost-effective for its own interests.
Which country in the world's military strength can make the United States more worried? Russia is one of them.
Although Russia's conventional military strength is not as good as the United States, its huge number of nuclear arsenals is enough to make the United States refuse to join the war in person.
Some people wonder, didn’t the United States and Russia fight face to face during the Syrian civil war ?
Why did the United States become timid when it came to the Russian-Ukrainian conflict?
In fact, This is the environment in which Russia is located is different. , especially in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russia is an international environment where there is no way to retreat.
The Russian-Ukrainian conflict is related to Russia's living space, and Russia will definitely treat it with the toughest attitude.
If the United States faces head-on with Russia in this situation, it is very likely that the fighting nation will throw out the nuclear weapon , which is obviously unfavorable to the interests of the United States.
Third, A large number of elite Russian troops did not participate in the "special military operation".
Currently, Russia has about 1 million troops, and only a small part of them have been dispatched in the "Special Military Operation", among which a large number of elite troops of the Russian army have not been dispatched in the "Special Military Operation".
We have released the news that we recruited 200,000 people and sent Chechen Republic troops into the war in Wudong to confirm that Russia has been hiding it.
mainly undertakes the important task of protecting Russian territory and preventing sudden troops from the United States and NATO.
If the elite Russian troops suddenly send troops to the war without suffering serious losses, it is likely to cause heavy losses to itself.
You should know that the US government is not stupid, and it will not sacrifice the lives of American soldiers in vain.
Fourth, The time when the United States sent to the war was wrong.
The United States is good at giving enemies a fatal blow when they are weak.
Although Russia has been successively sanctioned by the United States and the European Union and other countries, the Russian side has immunized their economic sanctions, and the combat effectiveness of the Russian army has not been completely weakened.
Russia is not weak enough to be allowed to be controlled by the United States.
To put it bluntly, means that the opportunity for the United States to lead his younger brother to beat Russia has not come.
This means that the United States will not send troops to participate in the war in person.
Fifth, The US NATO allies are unstable internally, resulting in a suspected backyard fire inside the "anti-Russia".
If the United States sends troops to fight, it will definitely bring a group of younger brothers to fight Russia.
Although many countries in the EU have strongly expressed their condemnation of Russia and even increased sanctions on Russia, their backyards are now on fire.
On October 8, tens of thousands of people in Germany protested the German government's energy policy and high inflation, demanding the lifting of economic sanctions on Russia.
In addition, there were also news of oil refineries strikes in France.
France and Germany are not only leaders of the EU, but also important ally of the United States within NATO.
There are problems within these two allies now, which is not good news for the United States.
If the United States wants to send troops to the war, it needs the help of France, Germany and other countries. If they fail to settle the domestic problems, it may not be realistic for the United States to let NATO allies beat Russia together.
Even if they were under pressure to send troops to the United States to fight, they might not work hard in the end.
will only make the US military attack Russia hard, and the United States itself must also think about it.
In fact, what determines the United States' troops to join the war is nothing more than the timing of , whether the allies are strong, whether the Russian military's strength is weak, and whether the United States can get the best benefits from it.
What do you think in the current situation of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Russia, Ukraine and the United States, will they do?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-