The two jetliners with a total price of more than 6.53 million yuan that the court of Zhenjiang Economic Development Zone of Jiangsu recently started to sell for due to unmanned bids for . After reducing the starting price by 1.307 million yuan, they will be re-launched on June 1.
Court Auction Announcement revealed that both are Bombardier CRJ-200 jets, with an appraisal price of 4.7379 million with registration number B-3001 and an appraisal price of 4.5982 million with registration number B-3016. In the first auction in late May, the starting prices of the two aircraft were RMB 3.31653 million and RMB 3.21874 million respectively. The auction attracted nearly 20,000 people to watch and 200 people set up reminders, but no one signed up. After being "released" again, the starting price was reduced to 2.653 million yuan and 2.575 million yuan, totaling 5.228 million yuan, and a deposit of 510,000 yuan is required. The Paper (www.thepaper.cn), by 12:00 on the 24th, there were more than 800 people watching, and more than 30 people set up reminders.
The pictures in this article are from the forensic auction announcement
According to the appraisal report issued by the asset appraisal agency , the two aircraft are owned by Beijing Zhonglu Aviation Star Technology Co., Ltd. When the Zhenjiang Economic and Technological Development Zone Court executes the dispute between Zhenjiang New District High-tech Industry Investment Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Zhonglu Aviation Star Aviation Industry Co., Ltd. and Beijing Zhonglu Aviation Star Technology Co., Ltd., it needs to evaluate the two aircraft of Beijing Zhonglu Aviation Star Technology Co., Ltd. According to Tianyan Check information, Beijing Zhonglu Aviation Star Technology Company was listed as the person subject to execution of breach of trust in by the court, and many judgments have not been fulfilled.
According to reports, these two aircraft have been parked in the open air in Changzhou Benniu Airport for many years and have no relevant maintenance. The evaluation report reminds that because the person subject to execution did not provide the registration certificate, civil aviation airworthiness certificate, flight log, etc., he only obtained the purchase agreement, inspection report, etc. from the court. The cabin door could not be opened during the on-site evaluation, and the inside of the aircraft was not investigated. The evaluation was based on existing information and was carried out under the assumption that the certificates and licenses were complete (or reissue), internal equipment and instruments and engines could meet the flight conditions after repair.
column editor: Qin Hong Text editor: Yang Rong Title picture source: Tuchuang Creative Picture editor: Yong Kai
Source: Author: Pengpai News reporter Qiu Haihong
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-