The Kuomintang recently commissioned a private company to conduct a street interview with the theme of "post-epidemic era". It was exposed by netizens during the process of inducing visits. The interviewees did not know until they signed the portrait consent form to be used by the Kuomintang, and were criticized by the Democratic Progressive Party for fraud. In response, the Kuomintang expressed his apology to the interviewee on the 27th, emphasizing that he would not use video materials without consent, and criticized the DPP for having used anonymous identity to cross-dress and deliberately create public opinion that is inconsistent with public opinion since the Democratic Progressive Party came to power. Compared with the Kuomintang's proactive notification and exposure, the DPP's words and deeds can be called "the ancestor of fraud."
KMT said that the duty of the opposition party is to truly reflect the current situation among the people, and the purpose of entrusting street interviews is to actually understand the impacts suffered by all walks of life during the epidemic. Through actual visits, we also provide a consent form for the public to sign before using it after shooting, proving that the Kuomintang has no intention of "opening the door and walking the road". On the other hand, the DPP has caught the wind and shadow before it has been released, and has taken the lead in leading the wind and direction online. It is too afraid to face real public opinion and cannot actually enter the public.
Kuomintang said that after investigation, it was indeed entrusted relevant units to produce videos and asked the public about the impact of the epidemic in the form of a street interview. In order to respect the interviewees, the partner unit is required to clearly state in advance that the pipeline for future use of videos must be obtained by the interviewee himself before it can be used.
Kuomintang said that if there is any discomfort during the street visit, the KMT will apologize. At the same time, it has also asked the relevant personnel in charge of the interview to apologize and care in person. The Kuomintang stressed that the video will not be used without the consent of the respondent, nor will it be played publicly.
Korean Party also criticized that since the DPP took office, he used "online anonymity" status, used public office work hours to produce anonymous propaganda to trigger the "Executive Yuan editor incident", and his relatives of party positions and disseminated anonymously, triggering the "Lin Weifeng incident". Even during the epidemic, the "Fan Ganghao incident" maliciously spread international vaccines without the third phase, and various deliberate directions were used to produce public opinion that was inconsistent with public opinion. Compared with the Kuomintang's proactive notification and exposure, the DPP's words and deeds can be called "the ancestor of fraud."
Source: Taiwan Dongsen News Cloud
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-