According to Taiwan media reports on March 19, Kuomintang New Taipei City Councilman Ye Yuanzhi recently uploaded a video to spoof the "Taiwanese Popular Power Outage Command Center", which attracted criticism from "Taiwan netizens" on the forum. Ye Yuanzhi found that the IP addresses of these netizens actually came from the administrative agency "National Development Conference", and criticized the DPP for raising the Internet army in the public department. Su Zhenchang, head of the administrative agency, responded today (19th) that public agencies have absolutely no cyber troops. Ye Yuanzhi then posted another article to mock him. Su Zhenchang dared to cheat even the gods, and now he deceived the public and said that public agencies will not support the Internet army. Do you believe it?
Ye Yuanzhi said that the reporter asked Su Zhenchang if he was investigating, but Su Zhenchang did not answer positively, saying that the public will not support the Internet army. He once said in front of the gods that he would not choose the third time New Taipei mayor, but later he chose it. Even gods dare to deceive the public. Now that they deceive the public, are you willing to believe it?
Ye Yuanzhi said that the editor of an administrative agency was once caught by a reporter and made a photo to attack the "opposition party". Isn't this the ironclad evidence to support the Internet army? In fact, Su Zhenchang just needs to order a thorough investigation of who is using the "National Development Council" IP to surf the Internet, why don't you dare to do it? The last time I changed Lin Bingshu's account to , Wikipedia , all of them were found. If I didn't check this time, there must be something that would not be affected.
Ye Yuanzhi re-approved, and Su Zhenchang said that every penny of the public budget was reviewed and agreed by public opinion institutions and could not support the Internet army. But in fact, the "Committee on Agriculture" had an online bidding case of more than NT$3 NT$3 in the previous "Committee on Agriculture" and some "legislators" wanted to investigate. The "Committee on Agriculture" actually conducted it in a confidential meeting, which was more cautious than defense weapons. The "Committee on Agriculture" could not even raise the work KPI in the secret meeting, and it was impossible to see how outsourcing manufacturers would implement funds. This is called being supervised? Lies without drafting!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-