After entering this year, some American think tanks and some retired military officers have been constantly hyping up some key offshore islands that we may control on the other side, such as the Dongsha and the Pacific, to achieve the so-called goal of forcing the other side to s

After entering this year, some American think tanks and some retired military officers have been constantly hyping up some key offshore islands that we may control on the other side, such as the Dongsha and the Pacific, to achieve the so-called goal of forcing the other side to surrender and testing the bottom line of the United States; of course, recently, Reuters in the UK also published a so-called "trilogy" of our cross-sea landing. The first step in its conception is that we will first log on to the above offshore islands.

The other side is also very concerned about this matter and continues to discuss and judge. Recently, in order to calm the morale of the army, the head of his "defense department" said that he had encouraged the officers and soldiers stationed in Dongsha to fight to the end if the above-mentioned so-called Dongsha landing scene occurs; in addition to the head of the defense department, the retired lieutenant general of the other side, the so-called former army leader Hu Zhenpu also echoed, "Around the mainland's intention to seize the island, the defense forces also have relevant plans to defend the Xinjiang region. If the mainland seizes Taiping Island desperately, then the defense forces will also seize Yongxing Island at that time," in order to achieve a "terror balance."

It should be pointed out that in addition to the so-called "terrorist balance", the opponent is currently following the guidance of the United States and conducting the so-called asymmetric combat layout, which is mainly reflected in the development of submarines, , long-range ballistic missiles, patrol ships and other defense equipment. Recently, some Western media have deliberately released the news that "seven countries help the development of submarines on the other side"; in addition, the media disclosed that because the construction progress of its "next generation missile patrol ship" has been delayed, it is planned to build 8 light patrol ships between 2,000 tons and 2,500 tons first to deal with the so-called threat from our side.

Some relevant experts also disclosed on social media that the eight light patrol ships that their defense department is currently considering are intentionally divided into two configurations: air defense and anti-ship type, and each model is built 4 ships, and will focus on the division of labor for air defense combat and anti-submarine combat; however, this emergency shipbuilding plan will obviously be a reduction version of the so-called "next generation missile patrol ship" and both the "Sea Shock Plan". This reduction is not only reflected in the reduction of tonnage. Take the light patrol ship of the air defense model for example. It is reported that the air defense capability will be reduced from "area air defense" to "near-zone air defense"; this detail also shows that it is likely that its so-called 8-ship construction plan this time is probably just a publicity show.

Return to the initial topic, the other side said that it is necessary to conduct a "terrorist balance" to seize Sansha City (Yongxing Island), but there is a fact that, given that Dongsha is an important portal for it to enter South China Sea and is also a key channel to Xisha (Yongxing Island), once Dongsha changes hands, it has actually been cut off the channel into the entire South China Sea. So how can we still log in and seize Yongxing Island through Dongsha?

This also shows from the side that politicians at present have no so-called good way to crack our all-round pressure network except for being verbally sensible and exaggerating!