Yuzhou
Public Security
Police Information Notice
May 31
Attack of police information /JING QING/
On May 31, 2021, Yuzhou City accepted 6 cases of telecom fraud, including 2 cases of order rebate fraud, 1 case of false investment and financial management fraud, 1 case of false loan fraud, 1 case of impersonation of e-commerce customer service fraud, and 1 case of other types of fraud (red envelope rebate).
Detailed case reports are as follows:
1, false investment and financial fraud
Case date: May 31, 2021
Case location: Yingchuan Street
Victim: Li Moumou, female, junior high school culture, after revisiting the victim, the victim claimed that he had never seen the anti-fraud propaganda page posted in the streets and communities, and had heard of the anti-fraud propaganda played on the speaker. In the community WeChat group, he did not pay attention to whether there were any telefault cases sent in the group. The victim downloaded the Agricultural Bank APP on his mobile phone, and transferred money to the other party through mobile banking, and had not accepted anti-fraud propaganda in the form of text messages of Agricultural Bank.
was cheated scene playback:
1. The victim's learning Strong Country APP someone added the victim's friend. The other party said that he could bring the victim to make money. Later, in order to make the victim believe, the other party first guided the victim to download an APP called Yuheng International on his mobile phone. Then the other party provided the victim with the so-called account and asked the victim to help with the operation first, and at the same time let the victim see the situation.
2. The victim operates according to the other party's requirements, invests in virtual currency on the APP, and makes profits by buying up and down. The victim helped the other party operate several times, and finally made money. Then the other party asked the victim to withdraw cash. After completion, the other party will send some screenshots of withdrawals to the victim, so that the victim believes that he can withdraw cash.
3. Then the other party induces the victim to invest and try it. Because he helped the other party to operate in the early stage, the victim did not find any problems. He registered his account with a try attitude and performed the first operation. After that, it quickly made a profit. Finally, the victim withdraws the cash and successfully received the account.
4. The victim believed it and increased his investment. As a result, after the victim increased his investment, he found that the money on the website could not be withdrawn. The victim contacted the other party, and the other party asked the victim to wait for a few days. As a result, the victim still could not withdraw the cash after waiting for a few days. He felt that he was cheated, so he called the police and was cheated of 29,020 yuan in total.
2. False loan fraud
Case date: May 31, 2021
Case location: Juntai Street
Victim: Zhang Moumou, female, junior high school culture, after a follow-up visit to the victim, the victim said that he had never seen the anti-fraud propaganda page posted in the streets and communities, had never heard of the anti-fraud propaganda played on the speaker, and did not in the community WeChat group. The victim downloaded the Bank of China APP on his mobile phone, transferred money to the other party through mobile banking, and had not accepted anti-fraud propaganda in the form of SMS by Bank of China.
was cheated and played back:
1. The victim received a call with the number 0085265646557. The other party claimed to be Ant Huixin's customer service, saying that the victim's 10,000 yuan loan on the platform passed the review and could be issued. Then the other party added the victim's friend through Alipay.
2. The victim believed it and downloaded Ant Huixin's APP from Alipay online banking according to the other party's guidance. Then, under the other party's guidance, he registered and bound the bank card. After completing it, he made a loan withdrawal, but found that it could not be withdrawn.
3. The victim found the customer service on the software to inquire about the situation. The other party asked the victim to transfer money on the grounds that he needed to activate a member to withdraw money. The victim transferred money according to the other party's requirements and activated the other party's so-called member. After the victim transferred money, he withdrew money again. He found that the cash still could not be withdrawn. The victim found the other party again. The other party also said that the victim's bank account for the receipt did not match his personal information, resulting in the account being frozen, so the cash cannot be withdrawn.
4. The victim asked the other party what to do. The other party asked the victim to transfer the money on the grounds that it required payment of deposit and verification fee for unfreezing the account and that it required payment of authentication fees. After the victim transferred the money, the other party asked the victim to transfer the money again on the grounds that the victim had no notes. The victim transferred the money again as required. As a result, after the victim transferred the money, the other party asked the victim to transfer the money again on the grounds that he needed to re-certify. The victim felt something was wrong and suspected that he was cheated, so he called the police, and a total of 40,998 yuan was defrauded.
3. Rebate fraud in orders and rebates
Case date: May 31, 2021
Case location: Huolong Town
Victim: Liu Moumou, male, junior high school culture, after a follow-up visit to the victim, the victim said that he had never seen the anti-fraud propaganda page posted by the village, and had heard the anti-fraud propaganda played by the loudspeaker in the village. He did not download the China Construction Bank APP on his mobile phone, and transferred money to the other party through mobile banking. He had not accepted anti-fraud propaganda in the form of text messages in the village.
was deceived scene playback:
1. The victim saw someone sending a part-time advertisement in the WeChat group, so he added the other party’s WeChat. Then the other party guided the victim to download a “Bubble” APP on his mobile phone, and then contacted the victim through the APP.
2. The other party introduced the order-brushing process to the victim. The other party will first send a link to the victim. Then the victim clicked the link to contact the customer service in the link to obtain the card number that needs to be transferred. After that, the victim recharged the money that needs to be paid to the card number provided by the customer service. After completion, the other party will return the principal and commissions advance paid by the victim to the account registered on the APP, and finally the victim withdraws the cash.
3. The victim swiped the order according to the other party's requirements. He received commission rebates in the first few times, and finally successfully withdrawn the money. Then when the victim was operating, the other party first asked the victim to transfer money continuously on the grounds of serial orders. Because the amount was too large, the victim felt that it was wrong, so he did not transfer money. Then when he asked the other party for a refund, the other party made the victim fail to complete the odd number requirement, resulting in the account being frozen. If he wanted to refund, the victim needed to pay a deposit to unfreeze before making a refund. The victim realized that he might have been cheated, so he called the police and was cheated of 6,500 yuan in total.
4. Other types of fraud (red envelope rebate)
Case date: May 31, 2021
Case location: Fanggang Town
Victim: female, high school culture, after a follow-up visit to the victim, the victim said that he had never seen the anti-fraud propaganda page posted by the village, had never heard of the anti-fraud propaganda played by the speaker in the village, and had not transferred money to the other party through WeChat group in the village.
was deceived scene playback:
1. The victim saw a message posted on a post through the Xiaohongshu APP on his mobile phone, saying that he could send red envelopes to make money. Later, based on the QQ number on the post: "167186097", he added a friend named "Yaya Little Rich Woman".
2. Later, the other party said that as long as the victim transfers 288 yuan to the other party, he can get a rebate of 5,200 yuan. The victim believed it and transferred the money to the other party as required by the other party.
3. As a result, after the victim transferred the money, the other party refused to rebate the victim. When the victim asked about the other party's situation, the other party asked the victim to transfer the money on the grounds that the victim did not pay enough money and the transfer required a handling fee.
4. The victim had no doubts and transferred the money again as required by the other party. As a result, after the victim transferred the money, he found that the other party still did not rebate him. The victim felt something was wrong and told his family about the situation. After the family understood the situation, they realized that the victim had been cheated, so they called the police and were cheated of 1,627 yuan in total.
5, order rebate fraud
Case date: May 31, 2021
Case location: Xiadu Street
Victim: Cao Moumou, female, junior high school culture, after a follow-up visit to the victim, the victim said that he had never seen the anti-fraud propaganda page posted in the streets and communities, and had heard of the anti-fraud propaganda played on the speaker. In the community WeChat group, he had never seen the case of sending fraud. The victim downloaded the ICBC APP on his mobile phone, and transferred money to the other party through mobile banking. He had not accepted anti-fraud propaganda in the form of text messages from ICBC.
was cheated scene playback:
1. A person contacted the victim through Douyin and asked the victim whether he wanted to make some money by liked Douyin. The victim agreed because he had nothing to do at home. Then the other party guided the victim to download an APP software called Azha on his mobile phone, and then the other party contacted the victim through Azha.
2. Then the other party pulled the victim to a chat group of Ah Sha. After the victim entered the group, he found that there was a person in the group who had a special like task. Then the victim went to the designated account or video as required by the other party. After completion, the screenshot was sent to the other party, and the other party would pay the victim a commission.
3. After the victim made several orders, the other party said that the commission for this order was small and he could recommend some orders with high commissions to the victim. However, after the victim learned that he needed to pay the principal, he was afraid of being cheated, so he did not agree. After that, the other party recommended to the victim many times, and the victim agreed with a try.
4. After the victim agreed, the other party guided the victim to download an APP called Zhongke Jincai on his mobile phone. Then the other party guided the victim to register and bind a bank card on the APP. Then the other party said that this is a order to help others repay the credit card.
5. Then the victim operates under the guidance of the other party. The victim needs to recharge first, then grab the order, and complete it according to the requirements after grabbing it. After completing it, the money will be placed on the victim's APP account. Finally, the victim can withdraw cash. After several operations, the victim successfully withdraws cash. When he was about to continue, the other party said that there was a relatively large order. Because the victim did not find any problems in the early operation, he believed that he had done it according to the other party's requirements.
6. As a result, after the victim completed it once, the other party asked the victim to continue to recharge and brush orders on the grounds of serial orders. The victim operated according to the other party's requirements. However, after the victim operated, the other party refused to return the principal and issue commissions to the victim. The victim asked the other party, and the other party kept asking the victim to continue to transfer and brush orders on the grounds that the victim had not completed the number of orders that needed to be completed.
7. Because the orders sent by the other party to the victim became larger and larger, the victim felt that something was wrong. In addition, the other party refused to give him a refund or commission, the victim suspected that he had been cheated, so he called the police and was cheated of 92,500 yuan in total.
6. Imitate e-commerce customer service fraud
Case date: May 31, 2021
Case location: Chengdong New District
Victim: Li Moumou, male, technical secondary school education, after a follow-up visit to the victim, the victim said that he had never seen the anti-fraud propaganda page posted in the streets and communities, and had heard of the anti-fraud propaganda played on the speaker. He did not transfer money to the other party through mobile Alipay in the community WeChat group.
was cheated and played back:
1. The victim used to buy a vocal class in a classroom called Tanzhou online for 2,000 yuan, but he didn't listen. The victim wanted to refund the money and then contacted the customer service without a response.
2. The victim added a customer service that claimed to be a Tanzhou classroom on Baidu Tieba. Then the other party guided the victim to operate on Alipay on the grounds of refunding the victim, and asked the victim to send a red packet of 1,480 yuan to the other party through Alipay.
3. Before sending the red envelope, the victim asked the other party why he wanted to transfer the money. The other party said that this was a necessary step for refund. Moreover, after the victim sent the red envelope, the other party would return the victim's money for purchasing the course and the red envelope to the victim.
4. The victim transferred the money according to the other party's request. As a result, after the victim transferred the money, the other party did not give a refund to the victim. Instead, he said that the victim had failed to pay and asked the victim to transfer a certain amount to the account designated by the other party. The victim was afraid of being cheated and transferred 1 yuan, which failed.
5. The victim told the other party about the situation. The other party said that this operation was one of the refund procedures and it was guaranteed that the transfer would not be successful. Then he asked the victim to transfer the money to another designated account. Because the account provided by the other party was only one wrong with the previous account, the victim felt something was wrong, so he transferred 1 yuan to the account, and this time it was successful.
6. The victim asked the other party what was going on. The other party said that it was because the victim did not follow the requirements, so he succeeded. Later, the victim was asked to transfer the money to the designated account. The victim felt something was wrong and suspected that he was cheated, so he called the police and was cheated of 1,481 yuan in total.
Important reminder:
END
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-