Recently, Bella and Gigi's father Mohamed Hadid released a python skin bag of Hermes on social media, and there were many different opinions on the Internet.
Many people were dissatisfied with his support for hunting animals in order to make his daughter happy, and even graffitied Bella's glasses on his bag. Netizens thought it was very inappropriate.
However, some netizens believe that the skins used by Hermes are all artificially bred, and those who protect animals are working hard, reasonable and legal, and just a little extravagant. But some people say that artificial breeding is also life, and taking skins as a package to satisfy vanity, should be resisted!
In fact, whether animal skin and hair should be used to make fashion has always been a big issue in the fashion circle.
Previously, Brazilian supermodel Gisele Bündchen was protested by the Care Animals Association to Victoria's Secret show because she endorsed rare animal fur when she was young, which caused damage to the public image. She has been scolded and online violence for many years, and some even blocked the road to protest when she went out shopping.
Later, she also joined the natural goddess industry that cared for animals, announced that she would never be a model for fur products, and became the promotion ambassador for artificial fiber fur, calling on everyone to replace real fur with fake fur, protect animals and protect the environment, so that this matter can be calmed down.
Bella Hadid is now boycotted by the Association for Care Animals, so how should it end?