On the one hand, the Russian and Ukrainian armies continued to fight fiercely, and the confrontation on the front was far beyond the past. On the other hand, the "referendum to Russia" organized by Russia in the controlled area was also underway.

The Ukrainian war is becoming increasingly fierce on the two fronts of the battlefield and the international political field. On the one hand, the Russian and Ukrainian armies continued to fight fiercely, and the confrontation on the front was far beyond the past. On the other hand, the "referendum to Russia" organized by Russia in the controlled area was also underway. In addition, Russia signed a "mobilization order", and many Western politicians and observers began to comment on the possible impact of the war.

Among these Western politicians, the most exciting ones are US President National Security Advisor Sullivan and Secretary of State Blinken . In an interview with TV station, the former used the Russian mobilization force to comment, saying that the United States saw the Russian army struggling in the quagmire of Ukraine , but he quickly turned around and said that if Russia uses nuclear weapon in the war against Ukraine, the war will have disastrous consequences. The latter said the United States has engaged Russia on the issue of nuclear weapons.

(Sullivan's speech on nuclear weapons reminded the outside world of the current confrontation between the United States and Russia)

This series of speeches made the outside world temporarily confused, and Russian politicians were also quite surprised. The Russian parliamentarians interviewed said that Russia had never said that they should use nuclear weapons. But the news of "Russia's use of nuclear weapons" has been released.

Although Sullivan's remarks were sudden, they were not completely groundless. This is not only because the United States' nuclear weapons still respond to Russia in a combat-ready manner, let alone at the beginning of the Russian-Ukrainian war, Russia also announced that its nuclear deterrent power had entered a special combat-ready state, which means that the Russian military's vehicle has been equipped with nuclear weapons and can be ready to dispatch bombers, nuclear submarines or ballistic missiles at any time to respond to foreign attacks with a "trininary" nuclear strike system.

In addition, Russian President Putin also called out to NATO in a speech not long ago, emphasizing that Russian military equipment still has advantages and warned NATO, led by the United States, not to intimidate Russia with nuclear weapons. This reciprocal tone makes it easy for the outside world to discover that both the United States and Russia may use nuclear weapons to decide the outcome on the Ukraine issue.

(Like the United States, Russia also has a "nuclear trinity" strike system for nuclear submarines, strategic bombers and intercontinental missiles)

Therefore, although in order to make the media relieved, Blinken said that the United States has plans to deal with Russia's use of nuclear weapons in Ukraine and vowed to make a firm response, but in the face of the large number of nuclear weapons held by Russia, it is difficult for the United States to disclose specific response details.

It is worth mentioning that although the gap between the national strength of the United States and Russia is very large, the nuclear arsenal is still evenly matched. Russia and the United States have 6,255 and 5,550 nuclear bombs respectively. The two countries' arsenals contain 90% of the world's nuclear weapons. At present, the Russian army has about 1,588 nuclear warheads deployed by the Russian army on intercontinental missiles and strategic bombers, while the US army has 1,644. This situation of 55-5 opening has become the basic platform for both the United States and Russia to meet their opponents. Moreover, both the United States and Russia are trying to transform nuclear weapons that have been targeting each other since the Cold War. The United States has spent a lot of money to replace the nuclear warhead system and began to replace the nuclear submarines with strategic nuclear deterrence weapons on a large scale, and then developed a new warhead suitable for the hypersonic weapon to accelerate its modernization.

(Russian intercontinental missile)

In addition, Russia also strengthened its strategic nuclear force before the war started, increasing the proportion of modern weapons it equipped to nearly 90%. Among them, the most destructive heavy intercontinental missile " Salmat " has also been deployed to troops after the war started and entered combat readiness duty. This weapon that can carry 10 heavy warheads, or 15 medium warheads, and has a range of more than 10,000 kilometers, has been aimed at Western Europe and the United States. In this way, when the United States and Russia began to use nuclear weapons to intimidate each other, Blinken's warning to Russia showed a dangerous side. The United States and Russia have restarted the crazy momentum of "guaranteed mutual destruction" during the Cold War in , and the variables in the Ukrainian war are more likely to cause the risk of the outbreak of nuclear war to rise sharply.

As of the current situation, Chinese Foreign Ministry Minister Wang Yi has emphasized China's position to countries including Ukraine at the recent UN General Assembly . Wang Yi specifically conveyed China's views to the Ukrainian Foreign Minister. China believes that the sovereignty of all countries should be respected, UN Charter also needs to be followed, the reasonable security concerns of all parties in the Ukraine issue should be taken seriously, and all efforts to peacefully resolve the crisis should also be supported. The most urgent task in the Ukrainian war is that several parties should resume dialogue as soon as possible, but the nuclear crisis triggered by the United States and Russia greatly reduces the possibility of dialogue.

(The heavy rain has stuck Ukrainian front in mud, but the Russian and Ukrainian armies still clash fiercely on the battlefield)

But even so, China still put forward four proposals. First, China believes that the top priority of the Ukrainian issue is to resume dialogue, and secondly, China also calls on all parties to maintain restraint and at least ensure the safety of nuclear facilities. Again, all parties need to minimize civilian casualties and continue to promote humanitarian aid . Finally, all parties need to make every effort to curb spillover effects. But the international community led by China is still working hard to ease the situation and calls on all parties to maintain restraint. After all, the impact of the Ukrainian issue is urgent enough, and Ukrainian nuclear facilities are still becoming the target of all parties involved in war. The spillover effect of the Ukrainian crisis is also seriously affecting the stability and security of the global energy and food markets. When people around the world may be hungry and cold, it will be meaningful to let the United States and Russia put away their nuclear weapons and avoid further intensification of disastrous consequences.