In order to fully implement the judicial system reform and the spirit of the National Court Trial and Execution Work Conference and further improve the quality and efficiency of the trial, on October 23 and 24, 2018, Liao Shaokun, Secretary of the Party Group and President of the Nanning Railway Transport Intermediate Court, formed a collegial panel and served as the presiding judge, and held public trial trials on two cases involving iron and civilian commercial appeals, including the appellant China Railway 25th Bureau Sixth Engineering Co., Ltd. and the respondent Huang Xiao, and China Railway Nanning Bureau Group Co., Ltd. and Chen Moumou Railway Passenger Transport Contract Dispute.
The two cases involving the second-instance of the railway trial presided over by President Liao are both typical cases in practice. Among them, the appeal case of the appellant China Railway 25th Bureau Sixth Engineering Co., Ltd. and the respondent Huang Xiao, which was heard on October 23, involves difficult issues such as contract subject, contract validity, project volume confirmation, and project payment settlement. The case is relatively complicated and difficult. In the case of a dispute appeal between China Railway Nanning Bureau Group Co., Ltd. and Chen Moumou railway passenger transport contract, which was heard on October 24, the victim passenger was injured due to the negligence of a third party on the train, involving the issues of how to protect the rights and interests of passengers and whether the railway transportation department should bear responsibility. It is a typical case involving the construction of high-speed rail infrastructure and daily operations in recent years. The case judgment results will have strong guiding significance and exemplary role.
As the chief presiding judge of the case, in order to accurately ascertain the facts of the case and apply laws and regulations in accordance with the law, before the trial, President Liao carefully reviewed all the case materials and prepared a trial outline; during the trial, he reasonably controlled the trial rhythm, and carried out in an orderly manner from court investigation, evidence-provement cross-examination, court debate to final statements, summarized the focus of the dispute and guided both parties to express their opinions, fully guaranteed the parties' right to sue. The court order in the two cases was standardized and the orderly litigation and defense was achieved, and the trial results were achieved.
Since the reform of the post system, Ningtie Intermediate People's Court has actively implemented the system of the court's president taking the lead in handling cases, and has pushed all judges into the post to return to the front line of trial and return to the judge's position, and has taken the lead in handling major, difficult, complex or typical guiding cases, which has played a good demonstration and leading role in encouraging all judges to focus on the main business of trial and do a good job in law enforcement and case handling.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-