Reference News Network reported on April 13 that foreign media said a new version of the death of Princess Diana appeared.
According to the Spanish "Abesy" website on April 7, on August 31, 1997, a car accident claimed the life of the most loved British Princess Diana . In August of this year, all kinds of speculations about that car accident became a hot topic in the media.
Although the police's final conclusion was that the driver was driving at a speed and drunk, the various versions of "Diet Princess Diana" that have been circulating in the market have never stopped.
seat belt could have saved her life
The famous British forensic doctor Richard Shepard will soon publish a new book - "Unnatural Causes". Instead of giving new conspiracy theories in the book, Shepard talks about Princess Diana's bad luck on the night of the car accident.
The cover of the book "Unnatural Causes"
He pointed out in the book that from the appearance, Princess Diana's wound was not big, and if she had worn a seat belt at that time, she would have escaped this disaster. The seat belt can buffer a lot of impact. If Princess Diana wears the seat belt, it may only cause a fracture. Although it takes a long time to recuperate, it will not be ruined.
Shepard said in an interview with the media that although the wound of Diana is not big, it appears in a fatal position.
He believes that Princess Diana's death was a series of tragedies caused by accident. If she was wearing a seat belt, if the angle of the seat in front of her was slightly tilted, if the driver was driving a little slower, if she could be taken to the hospital by an ambulance immediately after the accident... The tragedy might be It won't happen.
Experts refute conspiracy theories
Shepard believes that the cause of Princess Diana's death has long been revealed, but the hustle and bustle of the media and the endless conspiracy theories make everyone unable to believe that this is just a simple car accident.
Pathological analysis is irrefutable, but in addition to the ruptured pulmonary vein, a series of incredible things have also happened, which is why so many conspiracy theories have emerged.
On the 20th anniversary of Princess Diana's death, London Kensington Palace photos and cards placed in front of people's doors. Photo by Han Yan, Xinhua News Agency,
The car accident caused Princess Diana's left pulmonary vein to rupture and multiple fractures, and a small wound was left on the chest.
was not sent to the hospital immediately because she was in a stable state at the beginning and was even able to communicate with the outside world.
Shepard said that at this moment the ruptured pulmonary vein began to slowly seep blood in its chest cavity. After being sent to the ambulance, Princess Diana began to gradually lose consciousness. Although the doctor performed an emergency surgery on her after admission, she was unable to make it happen.
French police launched a two-year investigation into the accident. The final conclusion was that the culprit that led to Princess Diana's unfortunate death was the driver Henry Paul.
In 2004, Shepard re-examined the evidence and reports at that time during the investigation conducted by the British police, with the purpose of finding out whether the conspiracy theories about Princess Diana's death are of reference value.
Shepard decided that this was a car accident. British police invested £3 million in the investigation, re-investigating Princess Diana's car and the place where the accident occurred, and re-inspected 1,500 witness confessions and 20,000 documents. The investigation results are clear: Princess Diana's death was the car accident.
However, in 2008, the British police launched another investigation, and this time they added the paparazzi who pursued Princess Diana's car as the perpetrator.
The wound is small but the position is "wrong"
According to the British website of " Daily Mirror " on April 7, a famous forensic pathologist said in his new book that the fatality of Princess Diana was in his past. The injury was very small, "located in the wrong place", and extremely rare, and he had never seen any other injured person like him.
Nearly 22 years ago, Princess Diana died in a car accident in Paris, but Dr. Richard Shepard said that if Princess Diana had worn the back seat belt, she might have fractures and bruises, but she might have suffered from fractures and bruises. Can still appear in public.
Shepard, who examined the evidence of the car accident, said that a vein on the lobe on one side of Diana had a tiny fatal tear wound, which was extremely rare.
This is a photo of the Prince of Wales and Princess Diana taking a carriage back to Buckingham Palace after the wedding was held in St. Paul's Cathedral . Xinhua News Agency posted
Diana, 36, had several fractures in that car accident and suffered minor injuries to her chest. The people in the same car were her 42-year-old rich boyfriend, Dodi Fayez , 41-year-old driver Henry Paul, and Fayez bodyguard Trevor Rees-Jones, who was sitting in the passenger seat at the time. Reese Jones, 51, is the only survivor and the only person wearing a seat belt.
A two-year investigation ended by French police in 1999 found that the accident was caused by the driver Paul losing control of the car because he drove the car too fast under the dominance of alcohol and prescription drugs.
French police found that he did not have a license to drive a Mercedes-Benz S280 sedan to pick up and drop off passengers. The car's speed was between 73-96 miles per hour (1 mile is about 1.6 kilometers - this website note).
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-