[Editor's Note] This article is authorized by the author himself and is exclusively published on the Qin'an Strategy Headline Account. It is reprinted from the official account "Oryuan Viewpoint". There are many exciting contents, and everyone is welcome to follow.
Nowadays, Taiwan society has been highly "green".
The proportion of polls that support cross-strait unification has dropped to the single level.
In terms of the institutional arrangements after cross-strait reunification, both the Democratic Progressive Party with "Taiwan independence" and the Kuomintang with "independence and Taiwan" tendencies are highly consistent, and they shouted in unison, "I will never accept one country, two systems !"
's arrogance can be seen.
An important reason for Taiwan's popularity is that in order to achieve the interests of the party and personal interests, the political forces on the island incite the general public to resist unification and reject the institutional arrangement of "one country, two systems".
Therefore, Taiwan's blue and green politicians are their main driving force.
In response to this, on August 27, People's Political Consultative Conference Daily issued a strong warning to politicians on Taiwan’s island!
Taiwan has lost the opportunity to negotiate with the mainland for peaceful reunification twice. If we refuse to negotiate with us again, we will not even have the qualification to negotiate the final negotiation. After the mainland had to adopt a non-peaceful "physical" unification method, "one country, two systems" became Taiwan's luxury.
People's Political Consultative Conference Daily is an authoritative media, so this article is definitely an ultimatum warning!
The title of this article is: "Faced with unification, Taiwanese politicians should not hesitate anymore."
The article expresses the current future of the cross-strait reunification and Taiwan's historical options and realistic choices under the inevitable background of unification in three aspects. The article
first emphasizes that there is no timetable for unification, but it will not be led by Taiwan. The
article provides a detailed explanation of the unified "timetable".
The general idea is that the mainland currently has a "roadmap" for the unification, but there is no so-called timetable.
The reason is that the mainland has already grasped the unified initiative and dominance, and the mainland has not yet moved, so it is considered to leave more time for Taiwanese politicians to consider.
secondly, the time of unity itself is an uncertainty, which will change with the changes of external things. If the "Taiwan independence" forces suddenly create trouble, then the unity will be started at any time and completed in a short time.
In addition, if the United States and other external forces uncontrollably engage in "using Taiwan to control China" and play the "Taiwan card", and the Taiwan authorities are willing to act as chess pieces and rely on the United States to seek "independence" to engage in separatist activities, the mainland will also decisively launch a new initiative. Unify procedures and complete national unification.
Therefore, it is impossible to formulate or set a "timetable" on the issue of unification and
. Many Taiwanese media use this to fool the people on the island, saying that the mainland will take action after GDP reaches 85% of the United States by 2025; what should we wait for China in 2035? Achieve comprehensive modernization; what to achieve the second centenary goal by 2049, etc.
But the correct understanding of this should be that the meaning of having no timetable for unification is not "unification has no time", but that unification can be carried out at any time. The article
again mentioned that Taiwan has lost the best opportunity to refuse political negotiations with the mainland for a long time. The article
introduces the statement of a student named Xiao Huang who is studying in the mainland from Taiwan. Xiao Huang said that after reading the two Taiwan white papers in 1993 and 2000 and the white papers just released a few days ago, he suddenly discovered that Taiwan had lost the best opportunity to negotiate with the mainland on the issue of unification. "It can be said that his attitude was wrong." If you are wrong again, you will lose opportunities again and again."
On August 10, the mainland released the white paper on Taiwan for the third time. However, compared with the contents of the white papers in the previous two times, we will find that many of the contents arranged for Taiwan after the unification have been greatly changed.
1993 White Paper:
Taiwan enjoys a high degree of autonomy, a certain right to foreign affairs, and the mainland does not send troops; under one China, including the national name, national anthem, national flag, etc., it can be discussed.
2020 White Paper:
One China Principle Under the two sides of the Taiwan Strait can talk about anything. (no explicit mention of foreign affairs, military arrangements, etc.)
2022 White Paper:
After the unification, with the approval of central government , foreign countries can establish consular agencies or other official and semi-official agencies in Taiwan. (the focus is "approved by the central government")
So, judging from the content of the three white papers on the Taiwan issue, as time goes by, the superior negotiation conditions left to the Taiwanese authorities have become smaller and smaller, if Taiwan does not Cherish and believe that the last limited opportunity will be lost.
The most core issue is that unification is no longer a unity that Taiwan agrees with or without, but a matter of the necessity and inevitable unification.
Taiwan can only strive to obtain better unified conditions through sincere release under this premise, without any right to refuse unification.
Of course, this statement will make Taiwanese politicians and the indirectly entangled people shout and clamor, but is it useful?
A common truth is that clamor without strength is pitiful and meaningless. Many Taiwanese green camp people hug each other to keep warm under the weak heat are too naive, too simple, and too stupid.
The article finally mentioned that "one country, two systems" is most in line with the interests of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, but it will not be the only option.
In response to Taiwan’s society’s boycott of “one country, two systems”, many cross-strait observers warned that China’s realization of complete national unity is an inevitable requirement for the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.
If Taiwan's political elites have always refused to unification and incite the people to resist unification, or even attempt to split the country, in the event of being unable to achieve peaceful reunification, for the overall interests of the Chinese nation and to complete the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the mainland will be bound to be Force decisive measures to complete the great cause of national unification. The meaning of this passage is that "one country, two systems" is not the only option, that is, if Taiwan still does not accept this unified political arrangement, then if this arrangement is backward, it will be under "the decisive measures that are forced to be taken." "One country, one system".
This article in the CPPCC newspaper explains it very clearly that unification is no longer a matter of whether Taiwan agrees or not. If Taiwanese people miss the light of the last peaceful reunification again, they will not even have the opportunity to negotiate on the table. The door to peaceful reunification will also be closed.
Then what is waiting for Taiwan will be a kind of "physical" unity under "decisive measures". The result is that Taiwanese people have no conditions.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-