The 58 -point comment was very "comprehensive". From the literature review, research methods, experimental data, terms concepts, and innovation in all aspects, there is no specific opinion. Description of sexual issues;

"90 points, 92 points, 58 points" .

saw his doctoral dissertation blind review results, Zhang Shuyang's mind was blank. Every minute before the review results came out, he never worried that his papers would not be able to pass the blind trial.

58 score is very "comprehensive". From literature review, research methods, experimental data, term concepts, innovation in all aspects of "sharp reviews", has no specific opinion, all of them are generally innovative points and innovation points and innovation points. Systemic problems describe ;

The final conclusion is "Can't participate in defense" .

Picture Source: Doctor Paper Review Book Screenshot

Zhang Shuyang is a 985 college physiology , a 985 university in the middle of The research direction is the regulation of the pituitary hormone, because I want to make a big papers have taken the initiative to extend for one year. Now there are already one, one small and two SCI in his hand. He said that he thought that the result was still solid. He never thought that he would go out on the graduation thesis, and even contacted the units that were admitted.

"feels angry". Zhang Shuyang sat on the stairs at the entrance of the college for half an hour and repeatedly watched the inconsistent review opinion. Edit a circle of friends and deleted it in a while. The emotions accumulated during the graduation time came like a tide, and tears smashed on the screen of the mobile phone.

Blind Trial requires tightening. Doing things during the PhD, the graduation thesis knocked one by one, blind trial, it is impossible . No? "

Blind Trial is indeed stricter and stricter.

2014 The Ministry of Education issued the " Doctoral Disseatting Papers ", which stipulates that the dissertation is performed once a year. 3 Retain. Two days before

, Xiamen University announced two doctoral dissertations in 2021 and 2 master's dissertations. The dean and mentor of are interviewed, and the dissertation and instructor also handle .

Picture Source: Xiamen University

Shortless ago, there were also online Peking University 5 Ph.D., after graduation, he still lost his doctorate degree in due to a doctoral dissertation.

Picture Source: Unnamed BBS

and blind trial. Needle , avoid outburst in the future spot checks.

follows the development of "Breaking Five Wei", and 's major universities' requirements for "publishing papers" have begun to dilute. In contrast, the quality requirements for the "graduation thesis" are stricter . The proportion of blind review requirements for graduation thesis in different schools. Previously, the master's dissertation was usually between 30% and 50%. All doctoral dissertations were blindly trial;

is now all submitted by a master's dissertation. Expert opinion, as long as has a unqualified score, it is basically facing extension.

Apply for reconsideration

was surprised. He felt that this paper should be excellent, but he did not expect that it would be the result. The instructor said that he would never watch him extended this way. Within , he helped write the reconsideration application within an hour when he saw the email.

Early the next morning, Zhang Shuyang took an application form to find a teacher responsible for the papers. The teacher expressed support for his appeal. However, according to the school regulations, there are still many processes to go in the future. The director of the Academy's Degree Committee organizes experts to demonstrate whether the appeal can be passed, and after passing it, the next step can be submitted to the next blind trial.

may not be able to keep up with this defense. The papers that have been reviewed will be 100 % sample in the future. Finally, the final result of will no longer accept the objection .

Picture Source: Degree Thesis Review Review Application

, Zhang Shuyang chose to bear: "I still have confidence in my own papers, and I do n’t want to bet. However, has also made the worst plan to delay the defense He also prepared .

Zhang Shuyang said even hopes that there are some obvious problems in the text of your own theory. ML2 "Not high enough" , only in my heart A sense of weakness. He felt like the fish slaughtered by the chopping board, and all the efforts he had paid for the past five years even seemed a bit ridiculous.

The former Thesis will indeed exist, and Blind is adopted. TML3 is a method of "assigning" peer experts based on a small amount of information such as the theme and keywords such as the theme of the paper. Avoid abnormal phenomena such as "pulling relationships" and "find acquaintances".

Professor Zhao Shikui , Professor of , Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, once said that this is the most suitable, most effective, and most economical way to avoid human interference.

, but this does not mean that the blind trial must be fine.

A study on the improvement of the improvement of blind review pointed out that H is more "objective" than the open trial, and it is not affected by "humanism"; 1.

review experts will also make mistakes, so that the results of unfair review are produced. Professor Qiao Zhongdong shared several cases on his scientific network blog: L5

htm Professor L1 Professor Qiao believes that the dissertation and the experts of the papers should stand on a fair position and should have a strong Social responsibility awareness, professional ethics, and professional knowledge, have no prejudice to things, seriously and responsiblely propose to help doctoral candidates continue to modify the evaluation and opinions of the dissertation; "Otherwise, it will become a brick who wants to shoot to death who wants to die. Home.

Zhang Shuyang's mentor is also very anxious. Why did they have a long discussion for a long time in the period of waiting. Whether the review teachers in completely different fields or the conflict with the field of review teachers are too large, analysis is analyzed, and there is no conclusion.

What will happen to Zhang Shuyang, he does not know, the mentor does not know. In the short term, it is indeed in the hands of the unknown comment. The only thing he can do now is to wait ...

"The purpose of severe cracking down on bad style is not for the whole person. L4, at the perspective of Cheng Fangping, a professor at the School of Education, Renmin University of China, strictly reviewing the system The focus of the focus is to purify the discipline and help 80% of the people who have grown up, rather than destroy them at the last 20%, because "the contradiction is far more meaningful than intensify contradictions."

also encountered similar problems when guiding doctoral students. The instructor believes that the situation is good when the topic is good, but the situation will be very passive when the mainstream view of the academic community.

We hope that in the future, we can return to the evaluation of the dissertation itself on the basis of establishing a unified review platform in the future. After all, the fundamental purpose of blind trial is to improve the quality of the dissertation, rather than becoming a barrier to the graduation of students.

*Interviewed person Zhang Shuyang is a pseudonym

Reference Materials: