Good news about the epidemic has come one after another during this period, and it is more gratifying than each other, and each region is looser than each region. Almost overnight, many cities have been released directly, and communities do not have access permits, so they can enter and exit at will; large supermarkets are all open, and they do not look at the health code; restaurants can be dine in, schools are about to start school, and there is no need to do nucleic acid when traveling across regions... · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
should be said to have suddenly changed from strict lockdown to completely relaxed. No one can understand it at once. Is there something wrong with our epidemic prevention policy?
Let’s first analyze why “suddenly” is released, please pay attention to the word “suddenly”. The Chinese government has always been relatively prudent in its governance. Many policies often need to be repeatedly argued and taken into account all aspects of the issues, and then find one or several places to try them out. Only after practice is felt feasible and the time is ripe will it be fully promoted.
So, this "suddenly" gives people the feeling of not being prepared. It was still cleared out a few days ago and was still blocked. Then it was fully liberalized without the early guidance of public opinion and ideological preparation. This does not conform to the consistent style of the Chinese government, and there must be other reasons. I summarized it, it was nothing more than the following points.
1. People's livelihood
After three years of the epidemic, many people's family background has indeed been almost exhausted. After all, in the past three years, most people have had poor incomes. Although there will be no problems with their meals, the family’s expenses in all aspects are not small. If there are large expenses such as mortgages, car loans, credit card arrears, rent, and medicine, they have basically reached the point where they have run out of ammunition and food. You should know that Premier Li Keqiang previously said that 600 million people in China have a monthly income of less than 1,000 yuan. Therefore, in the later stage of prevention and control, the people were extremely resistant, and many places were refusing to cooperate with epidemic prevention work.
There is a problem with people's livelihood, which greatly weakens the mass base. In our party's view, if anything has no mass base, it must have deviated from the right direction. This is indeed not a empty talk, it is determined by the national nature of China's socialist society. Therefore, the epidemic prevention policy for large-scale blockade needs to be adjusted immediately.
2. Finance
Not only the people have no money, but the country has no money. The city has been locked down over the past three years. After the lockdown, the funds for epidemic prevention personnel, isolation hotels, treatment costs, nucleic acid testing, , vaccine injections, etc. are huge, and these are all financial guarantees. A set of data was found online, saying that the cost of fighting the epidemic in the past three years was : 7.2 trillion yuan in 2020, 7.5 trillion yuan in 2021, and unknown in 2022. The preliminary estimate is about 7 trillion yuan, totaling more than 22 trillion yuan.
If the data is true, it is indeed astronomical. The total national fiscal revenue in 2021 is only 20 trillion yuan. It can be seen that this expenditure is too great. No matter local or central government, there is no money. Therefore, many places owed the wages of prevention and control personnel and the fees for quarantine hotels. It was not that they were owed to the debt, but that they really had no money. Some local governments even relied on to raise to pay their wages. The situation of eating the food in the first year was too serious and the finances were overwhelmed. Therefore, the government cannot hold on to such a large-scale fight against the epidemic.
3. Can't prevent it
We know that there is a rule in nature that high-level organisms have strong survivability and low-level organisms have weak survivability. Just like carnivores like tigers and lions, they naturally have stronger survivability than herbivores, but their reproductive ability is relatively weak. They usually have only 2-4 births, but they can survive normally. Lower creatures are exactly the opposite, with extremely high mortality rates. In order to survive, I had to make a big fuss about reproduction. For example, frogs can lay 3,000-6,000 eggs at a time. There are so many eggs, there are always those who can turn into tadpoles and . There are so many tadpoles, there are always those who can survive (I am talking about real tadpoles).
virus belongs to the latter. As long as the host cannot be found, it will soon become cold.In order to survive, I had to spread wildly to reproduce and survive, and as the virus mutates, the transmission ability becomes stronger and stronger. The current Omickron variant has the strongest transmission ability. I remember that during this round of epidemic in Zhengzhou, the spokesperson's words were still in my ears: Now the virus is BMW, and we are tractors, and we can't catch up with the sun at all. This is also the main reason why all cities in the epidemic have tried their best to clear the zeroes.
Since the original prevention and control measures are no longer effective, it is not very meaningful to continue to implement them, so it is better to make changes.
4. The toxicity of the virus is greatly reduced
Before talking about this issue, we will sort out many so-called strange phenomena and chaos clearly so as to better understand China's anti-epidemic goals.
From about the second year of the fight against the epidemic, that is, in 2021, every time an epidemic broke out in the country, we took prevention and control measures, and this argument gradually emerged online: abroad has been liberalized long ago, the virus is a cold, and there is no harm at all; the reason why we blocked it is because of these and other dark corners, such as nucleic acid companies want to make money, vaccine companies want to make money, and the temporary cabin wants to make money, so we will never let it go.
has been released until now, and some people have arranged a sequel to verify the previous three-money combo of making money, saying sarcastically: In the three years of the epidemic, not many people died, and they spent countless manpower and financial resources. In the end, it turned out to be a cold, which is a joke. This shows that the epidemic has long been prevented from being prevented and controlled. The reason for prevention and control is to make money in the above three articles, and the words are extremely sarcastic and sarcastic.
Every time I see such remarks on the Internet, I am very angry and helpless. Because if these words were said by the hostile elements, we can understand that the enemy just wants to discredit you, no matter what facts are not true, the truth is not true. And what we ourselves say is purely logical confusion, right and wrong, and cause and effect. First of all, the money earned by the three people is all spent by the state. The state pays for the purpose of earning the money, and then makes the whole country exhausted. What is this logic?
Secondly, we use specific data to explain why it has been prevented and controlled for three years.
First of all, we need to be clear that in the three years of the epidemic, there are indeed not many people in China who have died from the new coronavirus, only 30,000, which is simply insignificant for a country like China with a scary population. After all, the number of people we die in traffic accidents every year is more than 100,000. Is it worth it to make such a big fight, mobilize the whole country, the whole people and the whole society in the end for this result? Since only 30,000 people died, it means that the harm of the virus is not so serious, so there must be a shady story! The logical confusion of
is speechless because there is a basic question here: Why only 30,000 people died in China, just because the virus is weak, is it a cold?
The above two data are the total death toll in the world and the death toll in various countries. We can see that if you catch a country, the death toll is much higher than that in China. How many people have died? Is the virus just a cold?
I have said many times in my previous articles. If China's prevention and control policy is like the United States, according to the population ratio, the number of deaths in China should be close to 5 million, but now it is 30,000! Isn’t this the result of our nation’s fight against the epidemic?
So those remarks that said, "Thank you for three years, but in the end it's just a cold." Little do they know that it is because everyone has worked hard to fight the epidemic for three years that they have fought the new coronavirus into a cold.
After sorting out this issue, let’s continue to talk about the issue of virus toxicity. As mentioned in the previous question, in order to survive, the virus will continue to update and improve its transmission ability. After the new coronavirus mutates into Omickron, it will undergo mutation and upgrades almost every month, and its transmission ability will be stronger every time. But the energy of things can only be concentrated in one aspect. When the transmission ability is improved, the toxicity will also decrease. Since the toxicity has long decreased, why have we only let it go now? This is also a point that many people are resentful.
is very simple, because China has prevented and controlled the virus so well, and the number of infections and deaths is too small. We can never get the latest and most accurate data on the virus and don’t know what consequences will be caused by the current toxicity of the virus.
This is the data that was just outdated in the peak of the epidemic in Hong Kong in March this year. Hong Kong has a population of more than 7 million, with nearly 7,000 new confirmed cases a day and 135 deaths. If we had not taken prevention and control measures in the face of the epidemic before, according to the population ratio of Hong Kong, the mainland will have more than 1.4 million new confirmed cases every day, with 27,000 deaths, which is almost the number of deaths in the mainland in three years. At that time, can you say that the virus is a cold? You should know that the medical conditions in Hong Kong are far better than those in the mainland, which means that the death toll should be far more than 27,000. Therefore, why we are reluctant to let go, this is the reason why we have been reluctant to let go. We have never had a large amount of virus data for reference and analysis.
Until this round of epidemic, the virus clicked the buff and spread wildly, and a large number of -positive patients appeared in China. We have mastered the first-hand data and found that there were 160,000 infections in Guangzhou, and 4 severe cases and 0 deaths. I believe that it is not just Guangzhou, but Zhengzhou, Lanzhou, Hohhot, Urumqi, Chengdu, Baoding ·····The data in these cities are also similar. At this time, the country determined that the toxicity of the virus will no longer cause great harm to the people, so it decided to let it go in full.
When we write this, we understand that the Chinese have worked so hard for three years to try to drag the virus to this point today. When the toxicity of the virus is reduced to the equivalent of a common cold, thus avoiding the death of a large number of people. It is by no means a naive statement that "the virus itself is a cold". Is there any problem with saying that we have put "life first" to the extreme?
Finally, I want to say that the epidemic has not completely ended yet, and there are still great hidden dangers in the next few months. After the full liberalization, a large number of people will inevitably be infected. Medical expert Feng Zijian predicts that 80 to 90% of people will eventually be infected. Although it is not harmful to ordinary people, the special group of the elderly should pay special attention.
Currently, nearly 26 million elderly people over 60 years old in China have not been vaccinated, and many of them are low immunity, and even suffer from underlying diseases such as hypertension , diabetes , cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases , kidney disease, etc. If you are beaten by the virus for 40 degrees fever for three days, it may be more unlucky.
In addition, my country is a developing country after all, and there is a certain gap between medical conditions and developed countries. There is only one doctor in every 3,000 people, and beds are only 3.6, which is far lower than 11.5 per 100,000 people in developed countries.
After the foreign countries are liberated, we will experience several waves of epidemic transmission climaxes, one wave of infection, blockade; if we release, infect and blockade, we should not be able to escape this stage. The number of positive patients will increase significantly in the next few days, and there will inevitably be medical runs. Beijing Emergency Center has called on young and middle-aged and mild patients not to call 120 as much as possible, and to leave the opportunity for first aid to critically ill patients and the elderly and weak. Some experts have judged that the first wave of infection will reach the peak of the first wave of infection on January 5, and everyone must protect the elderly and children at home.
The time to win is not far away, but the road ahead is not smooth, we must be cautious. Next spring, the day when flowers bloom will be blooming, and we will be reborn after we bloom!
The full text is over. If you like it, please follow the WeChat official account: Daily Short News (mrnews1)!
