After suffering a crushing defeat in the "nine-in-one" election in Taiwan, the DPP seemed to have become the "target" overnight. As the Kuomintang re-entered the political center, the era of the DPP dominance is gone forever.
(Shi Mingde)
Now, the "anti-China and Taiwan" propaganda of the DPP and the "de-Singapore" policy of counter-involving actions have been eliminated. "Pursuing peace and avoiding war" is the true voice of most people in Taiwan. It’s just that the DPP is good at winning people’s hearts and the proper use of propaganda tools has led to the so-called “refusal to unification” and other niche voices that once swept away the demands of the people on the island to care about the economy and life.
Public opinion cannot be violated. The DPP has lost the trust of the people more and more because of its arrogance. The Kuomintang, which has just found its momentum to return, seems to have learned the lessons of the DPP. In recent times, the Kuomintang’s several voices have also given confidence to the local people.
(Hong Xiuzhu)
Jiang Wanan, who was just elected as mayor of Taipei, is still in the election stage, but has given peace-loving people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to reassure them.
He publicly told the media that he would continue the Taipei-Shanghai Twin Cities Forum and maintain exchanges and communication between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. Let this few official exchange platforms between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait truly become a catalyst for stabilizing cross-strait relations. Although the statement of the Chairman of the Kuomintang Zhu Lilun avoided the important points, it also stated that cross-strait peace has become the voice of everyone.
At the recent forum on the 30th anniversary of the " 1992 Consensus ", former chairman of the Kuomintang, Ms. Hung Hsiu-chu, participated in the event in a video. She said that the meaning of the 1992 Consensus is that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to the same China. If the 1992 Consensus is negated, it may lead to turmoil in Taiwan's relations. Ms. Hung Hsiu-chu expressed her support for the promotion of unification and her dissatisfaction with the current situation on the island, which caused a great response.
(Zhu Lilun)
And recently, many DPP members have also begun to speak out. A few days ago, Taiwan's deputy leader Lu Hsiu-lien changed her previous remarks of "anti-China and Taiwan protection" and clearly stated that she required the DPP to change her work style, pay more attention to the lives and employment of the people on the island, and not push the people into war.
This time, former DPP chairman Shi Mingde also spoke. Recently, Shi Mingde published an open letter emphasizing that "avoiding war and not provoking" is the obligation of the people of Taiwan to world peace. Although the former chairman has not completely changed his position, his idea of establishing a peace zone in Taiwan is still worth mentioning.
Shi Mingde believes that Kinmen and Mazu in Taiwan are closest to the mainland and are not within the scope of the "protection" of the United States, which is prone to accidental fire. Therefore, the Taiwanese authorities must focus on ensuring the safety of these two places.
(Tsai Ing-wen)
Shi Mingde's words, although the DPP's self-righteous "anti-China" was removed, the "protecting Taiwan" was still deeply rooted, and its starting point was still the usual style of the DPP. The idea of
is unrealistic. If the DPP members insist on their own initiative, leading to the mainland's decision to reunify the military, the PLA's pace will definitely not be able to stop at Kinmen and Matsu, and there will be a situation of delay. It is bound to win the entire Taiwan Island with lightning speed, minimizing the damage, leaving more time for people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait to enjoy peace.
(Jiang Wan'an)
Therefore, what Shi Mingde calls the peaceful special zone is more like a kind of compromise and concession that the DPP members had to make in the face of the unfavorable situation where the general situation is hopeless, but this slight concession cannot save the depravity of the Taiwan authorities and cannot make cross-strait relations better.
If the Tsai Ing-wen administration continues to manipulate the issue of "anti-China and Taiwan protection", there can only be two results: either throwing Taiwan into war or being driven out of power by angry people.
