Chen Longxiang, the prosecutor who was in charge of the "Changhua Hockey Association Case", was sentenced to impeachment. Chen Longxiang said that the "Supervision Commission" who brought up impeachment used a biased political stance to examine and frame him. (Market photo of Taiwan's "China Times News Network")
"Supervision Commission" Gao Yongcheng and Lin Yurong impeached prosecutor Chen Longxiang for the second time with the "Duan Yikang Hockey Case". Huang Zizhe, vice chairman of the Kuomintang Cultural and Communication Association, criticized yesterday that the "Supervision Commission" was openly violating the spirit of the rule of law and impeached the prosecutor who acted impartially for the second time, trying to silence the judicial community. This is not a political pursuit, but what is a political pursuit? How can Tsai Ing-wen implement judicial reforms that have become jokes?
Huang Zizhe said that the court has ruled that Duan Yikang lost the case. Unexpectedly, Duan Yikang "fights against the evil divination" and was unwilling to swallow hockey according to his original promise. He even made a confession to the "Supervision Commission" that he wanted to impeach the prosecutor in charge of the case violated the "law" and neglected his duties, completely ignoring the rule of law and arrogant behavior. However, the supervision agencies in Taiwan were in a collusion and injuring the judicial independence with politics.
He pointed out that when Chen Longxiang was first impeached, the judicial court of Taiwan's judicial institutions ruled "imprisonment" and also believed that the "Supervision Commission" proposed a retrial to "express no reason" and rejected it. Unexpectedly, Gao Yongcheng and Lin Yurong dared to openly violate the principle of "no retrial of one matter", impeached Chen Longxiang for the second time, and even failed to guarantee the opportunity for the impeached person to defend, making procedural justice become empty talk, making Taiwan's supervision agencies the initiator of the credibility of the judiciary, and the spirit of democracy and rule of law disappear.
Huang Zizhe said that the DPP authorities nominated the "Supervision Commission" for nepotism. In the past, Chen Shimeng Gan was a thug in East Factory , but now Gao Yongcheng and Lin Yurong harmed judicial independence. If it weren't for the DPP's backing, would he dare to act recklessly like this?
Korean Party public opinion representative Li Guimin also criticized the "Supervision Commission" for implementing double standards. Gao Yongcheng and Lin Yurong believed that Chen Longxiang closed the case based on the defendant's confession. Without waiting for the reply from the Changhua County Government, it was a serious violation of the case handling procedures. However, this time the "Supervision Commission" impeachment did not give Chen a chance to explain or make an appointment. According to the standards of the "Supervision Commission", does not violate procedural justice?
She questioned that the "Supervision Commission" move is to "play a warning" to the procuratorate and to play a guiding chess for judicial power . It is to blatantly interfere with the judicial power and "cross the boundaries". Will the "Supervision Commission" be unsatisfied with the judgment in the future and will it impeach judicial personnel if it is not satisfied with the judgment? The former "Supervision Commission" who is not named in
criticized him for not knowing what he is doing. The current "Supervision Commission" has not figured out what he is doing and his attitude every day. Judging from his work experience, many of them are not qualified. The Chen Longxiang case does not have the principle of not being able to handle .
He said that after taking office, the Supervisory Commission must cut off the previous special relations, including prosecutors, the Democratic Progressive Party and other parties. The Supervisory Commission must have no party membership and no political prejudice, and make fair judgments based on facts. But now the "Supervision Commission" has nakedly demonstrated its political awareness and previous entanglements, which is really bad.
Democratic Progressive Party’s public opinion representative Cai Yiyu also believes that to clarify whether it is the same case, the "Supervision Commission" will file a case against the incident and individuals as long as it finds that a certain incident needs to be investigated and impeached; different "Supervision Commissions" may think that it is necessary to impeach, but it is impossible to impeach twice only for the same person and the same incident.
The general convener of the People's Party and the National Congress Qiu Chenyuan said that the power of the "Supervision Commission" is respected, but whether the second impeachment is necessary and whether it conforms to procedural justice in the process must be clarified again, and the social perception generated by the second impeachment must be considered.
