The BNT vaccine "Fu Bitai" represented by Shanghai Fosun arrived in Taiwan yesterday (2nd). The "Epidemic Command Center" in Taiwan originally listed those aged 12 to 17 as priority recipients of BNT vaccines. After the British and "Party Congress" issued joint statements within the Democratic Progressive Party, it quickly made a big move and included those aged 18 to 22 on the priority list, which aroused heated discussions from all walks of life. In the face of external doubts, Chen Shizhong, commander of the "Command Center", responded at a press conference yesterday that it was because it had reached this time point and the age group had never had the chance to attack, so it was necessary to "give people who had no chance to have a chance." As soon as this statement was made, netizens complained that everything was considered by the DPP authorities.
"Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation" Chairman You Yinglong criticized yesterday that the DPP authorities have made changes in the use of this batch of precious vaccines, made repeated decisions, and breached trust in the people, "igniting the public's rage." Who should be the first to be a medical staff? It is not easy to have a consensus, "The most taboo thing is that the ruling in charge is to do whatever it wants." You Yinglong pointed out that the "epidemic command center" changed the original order of vaccine administration under the urge of more than 10 British "legislators". These "legislators" put forward bad ideas only show that they have poor moral standards, but the "command center" cannot withstand the pressure and treats vaccines as their own private property, and gives them to whoever they want. "Is this possible? Can the public be convinced and acceptable?" Questioning the DPP authorities regard vaccines as a means to buy specific ethnic groups, in an attempt to regain the lost public support.
Korean Party "legislator" Li Guimin also criticized it. It is obvious that it should be administered in order according to age and risk of infection, but the young and middle-aged generations have now become "vaccine orphans." Young people whose support level of the DPP has declined like an avalanche are open to the fight first. Do they use the vaccine policy to buy tickets and tie up the "first voters"? Moreover, under the operation of the DPP authorities, Taiwan is performing a "Hunger Game" that is competing for vaccines every day, and the "Command Center" should explain why the policy has turned sharply.
Taiwan's well-known pharmacist Lin Shifeng posted on Facebook on the 2nd that Taiwan's vaccination policy is the most complicated in the world. Sometimes it is added and sometimes it suddenly changes its qualifications. If you miss the round you can get, it doesn't know when it will be again. For example, the families of medical staff can still get the vaccine in May, but in June it becomes inconsistent. Lin Shifeng bluntly stated that in addition to the vote considerations, he really couldn't imagine why it is fair and undisputed to be made from top to bottom after simply deducting medical staff and crew members, but it needs to be so complicated and also "rolling adjustment".
Taiwan Business Association Chairman Xu Shubo also criticized the DPP authorities for the wrong policy of vaccination, so that people who are in office can get vaccinated, those who are actually running outside and need to contact people cannot get vaccinated; travelers also have the same complaints that "the ones who are able to get vaccinated, but those who are carrying people cannot get vaccinated."
DPP authorities frequently modify vaccine injection policies, which has also aroused dissatisfaction among a large number of netizens. Many people left messages saying "the order of vaccination for people aged 30 to 50 is suspected to be ignored or neglected"; "It is difficult to get down according to the age order?"; "It is clear that wrong policies provoke generational confrontation", "Can the DPP authorities unify the standards?"
. Regarding the "turning" of BNT vaccines, college students give priority to the use of vaccines, many netizens also pointed out incisively, "College students have votes, and they need to give them a chance", "I understand, I need to give a chance to vote", "Obviously it is a vote consideration", "I heard that vaccines follow the votes", "Because politics is above the health and well-being of the whole people." (Lin Jingxian/editor)
