At the time of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the United States has made new moves in addition to various sanctions on Russia, and its remarks accusing Russia are even more ridiculous. At this critical moment, China stepped forward and directly threw out eight iron evidence to fight back against the United States and the West, leaving it speechless.
It is undeniable that a conflict between Russia and Ukraine has revealed the ugly faces of the United States and Western countries. They have always claimed that the so-called "science has no borders" and "music has no borders" have been pulled down by the United States and the West themselves. Even Russian cats, dogs, and trees have become the targets of sanctions imposed by the United States and Western countries. Some of their current actions have no bottom line. However, this is not over yet. Recently, the United States has done something even more ironic to the outside world.
It is understood that recently, a spokesperson for the US State Department said that in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the basic rules of the international order that "big powers cannot bully small countries" have been destroyed. Obviously, the US government’s words are intended to accuse Russia of carrying out special military operations in Ukraine to “big powers bully small countries” and break the order that “big powers cannot bully small countries”. These words were really ironic when they said from the US government. When it comes to "big powers bullying small countries", the United States can be said to be the least qualified to accuse others of the country.
Regarding the US's accusation of "thieves shouting and catching thieves", on March 16, at the regular press conference of the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs , a reporter asked the Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian about this matter. In response, Zhao Lijian first gave a cold "huff" and then directly gave 8 iron evidence to ask the United States. Every word is sonorous and powerful, and every sentence directly pointed to the pain points of the United States. Zhao Lijian said that he thought about the United States itself in the 1960s for Cuba and Panama, in the 1980s for Grenada , in the 1990s for Yugoslavia , and at the beginning of this century, and later in the 1760s for Syria and Libya , what did they do. What the US side does is a typical example of the world-recognized "big powers bullying small countries" and a textbook-level example. Why does the United States keep silent about these things? The US side should ask the US side to put it on the right first for the big bullying of the small.
At the same time, Zhao Lijian emphasized that the fundamental way to resolve the Ukrainian crisis lies in dialogue and negotiation, rather than unilaterally defining the "rules-based international order" based on oneself, nor is it that forces countries to choose sides and create a " chilling effect " that is either friends or enemies. There is only one system in the world, which is the international system with United Nations as the core. There is only one order, which is the international order based on international law .
The reason why Zhao Lijian emphasized this is because in recent times, the United States and Western countries and media have frequently hyped China's position on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine. Previously, the United States also exaggerated false information such as "China provides weapons assistance to Russia." Recently, another Western media asked Zhao Lijian that China has not clearly opposed Russia's "invasion" of Ukraine. Can we believe that China can accept this indiscriminate killing of civilians?
Asking this obviously strong prejudice and malicious question, Zhao Lijian directly responded and sent a series of rebellious questions. Zhao Lijian said, did you also care so much about the casualties of Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Palestinian people? Are these civilians meaningless to you? There is also Serbia in 1999, namely the Federation of Yugoslavia. Do you care about their civilian casualties? If so, I'm afraid you are not qualified to accuse China. China's position is open and honest, objective and fair, while the position of the United States and NATO , including the positions of some Western media, is obviously hypocritical. You should recommend that the United States and NATO do not transport ammunition and not add fuel to the fire.
