British Foreign Minister Leeds Trass recently delivered a speech in London, advocating the "global NATO " in the current situation in Russia and Ukraine, and called on NATO to cooperate with allies such as Japan and Australia to "ensure Taiwan has the ability to defend itself." Not only that, she also criticized China for "not condemning Russia on the Russian-Ukrainian dispute" in her speech, and even blatantly threatened China that if "international rules" are not followed, the West will unite to prevent China's rise.
So, what will happen if NATO, led by the United States and Britain, blindly stimulate and expand conflicts and incite confrontations in the camp? As early as 50 years ago, the British government had recognized Taiwan as a province in China. Now the British Foreign Secretary openly targeted China and threatened to "protect Taiwan". What is the intention? Please pay attention to the Yinan Military Forum of National Defense Time and Space.
Zhou Yuting:
As the head of British diplomatic affairs, Tras said wildly at the beginning of his tenure that China's economic development has posed a threat to the United States and that it would cancel China's identity as a developing country, , and use this statement to flatter the United States to stand firm. On April 27, Trass' speech at a London dinner was even more arrogant, claiming that NATO should become "a global NATO" to deal with the so-called "threats" around the world, and publicly instigated NATO to strengthen cooperation with allies such as Japan and Australia, and to "preemptively" solve the "threats" in the Indo-Pacific region. At the same time, she also warned China to "according to the rules", otherwise, China will not continue to rise. It is obvious that the "rules" mentioned by Tras do not refer to the basic norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of " United Nations Charter ", but are the family laws and regulations of small circles and small groups. Professor Yinan, how do you view Tras’s remarks that can be called “naked threats”?
Jin Yinan: British Foreign Secretary Tras gave this speech, what surprised people the most? It's her attitude. Look at her arrogant, arrogant and worldly posture that is within my control! I said, you are just a foreign minister in the UK. Who do you think you are? Can you represent NATO? Can you represent the United States? Can you represent EU ? The UK has withdrawn from the EU, and the UK's attitude certainly cannot represent the EU. But you want to represent NATO, Germany, France, Spain, etc. Can these NATO countries agree with your attitude? Do you want to represent the United States, and does the United States allow you to represent it? The content and status of Trass' speech this time were simply too excited. She took advantage of the current changes in the world situation and the Russian-Ukrainian crisis, eating Ukrainian "human blood steamed buns", making a fuss and expanding herself to this level. It is amazing! Look at how arrogant she spoke, it seems that Britain was still in its heyday when colonies were spread all over the world in the 18th and 19th centuries. Her arrogant attitude was as domineering as the imperialist countries in the 20th century when they launched wars and conquered Europe, Africa, and Asia. I said that Tras is now in the 21st century, with more than 190 independent countries around the world. Why do you make such crazy words in ? Today's Britain is at most a "hearing bad" in the United States.
On April 10 this year, NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg said in an interview with the British Daily Telegraph that the world is changing now and NATO is undergoing fundamental changes. What exactly is the "fundamental change" he refers to here? I think is NATO, as a military organization that was about to break out during the Cold War, now has transformed into a global military organization through the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. NATO not only wants to complete the " Crusade " in Europe, but also wants the whole world to return to the world they imagined as Christian white rule. The focus of our analysis of Trass's speech on April 27 is not on what NATO's policies should become, how to interfere in China's internal affairs, or how to curb Russia, but on the arrogance and arrogantness she reveals between the lines. Like Stoltenberg, Tras longed to return to the years of colonial glory.But who made them feel this illusion? What exactly makes them think that the world is in control?
In recent times, on the issue of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, the West has shown a "grouping" trend around the sanctions against Russia. They thought they could issue orders to the world again, and seemed that the whole world had to crawl at their feet, thinking that they could do whatever they wanted. I remember that when Chairman Mao Zedong talked about stupid people doing stupid things, he once used a sentence called "Shot yourself in the foot." I think they will definitely see in the future how they lifted the stones and how they hit their feet in the end.
Data map: NATO Headquarters (Source: CCTV News)
Zhou Yuting:
Cold War has long ended. As a product of the Cold War and the world's largest military alliance, NATO should judge the situation and make necessary adjustments. However, NATO has long been conservative of the old security concept and used the "old Cold War" method to engage in camp confrontation, create troubles, provoke conflicts, continue to break through regions and fields, and advocate the "new Cold War" of group confrontation. It can be said that NATO, led by the United States, is moving further and further away on the road to counter the historical trend, and the inherent imperial mentality of Tras and the Cold War mentality of and is long outdated and unpopular. The international community should be highly vigilant and firmly opposed to this.
Jin Yinan: is like this. Look at the British Empire represented by the Foreign Minister Tras, and the several forces standing behind her, including the United States and NATO, have a bloodthirsty instinct. When you smell the fishy smell of blood, you will be excited and excited. In the era of globalization, how much can a UK contribute to the world? In addition, the UK has withdrawn from the EU, so the contribution value is even less. Someone once said this saying, "The lion of the British Empire has only one tail left, and the American soldiers whipped it the whole world." This is a very vivid metaphor, which means that the guys have made only a handful of contributions to mankind in peaceful development, economic construction, scientific and technological innovation, but when they talk about war and conflict, they are extremely excited. French President Macron once described NATO as " brain-dead ", but only one or two years have passed. NATO has imposed comprehensive sanctions on Russia through the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, resurrected in full blood and rekindled, and stood up like a zombie. What do you rely on? It is based on bloodthirsty and eating Ukrainian "human blood steamed buns". What has NATO brought to the world? Have you brought benefits? Have you improved your education level? Have you improved your technological capabilities? No! NATO simply creates conflict and chaos through war and through a large amount of arms aid. Let’s see, in this Russian-Ukrainian conflict, did the UK die? Did a NATO member state die? Is there a single person dead in the United States? No. Those who died were all Ukrainians , all Russians, and NATO achieved its goals with the blood of Russians and Ukrainians.
NATO's excitement in the end will "shoot yourself in the foot"! This excitement will give them an illusion that the world is within their control, and that everyone in the world must obey NATO's orders and obey the rules set by NATO. If I don't obey, I can ban you immediately. What is even more shocking is that in the past, they had to use some diplomatic rhetoric and express it around the corner when they said these words, but now they are not. Don’t forget that Tras is just the British Foreign Secretary. They are now completely threatening and intimidating nakedly, straightforwardly and directly. But I want to remind Trass that Chinese people are not scared. Chinese people will never be scared by your words, Trass. We will never forget what you said on April 27, and see how you fulfill them in the future.
Data picture: US Secretary of State Blinken (Source: Global Network)
Zhou Yuting:
That's right. As netizens said, after the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, the originally twilight Western world seemed to be fed with "chicken blood", and NATO, which was "brain-dead", also resurrected the dead. War and conflict not only eliminated the identity crisis, but also made it feel delusional, wanting to build the so-called "a global NATO" in the chaos. We have noticed that while NATO is messing with Europe, it also intends to lead the conflict to Asia and China. Now it is frequently targeting China. On April 26, U.S. Secretary of State Blinken claimed at a Senate hearing that the U.S. government will do its best to "help" the Taiwan region to ensure it has the ability to resist any potential "aggression", including "unilateral actions that mainland China may take against Taiwan." The next day, Tras followed closely, followed the United States and shouted in his speech, "We must protect Taiwan from mainland China." Professor Yinan, does the United States and the United Kingdom want to make profits again by provoking conflicts in the Taiwan Strait?
Jin Yinan: These people have one of the biggest characteristics, what is it? is so fierce and cowardly! Although Tras and others boasted that G7 Group's total economic output accounts for half of the world's total, I want to say that G7 Group is your personal one? Can you speak on behalf of G7 Group? She feels so good about herself. Don’t look at these people’s words in a striking way, it’s really time to borrow the courage of the United Kingdom and the United States. Do you think they dare to promote the public declaration of independence of Taiwan? No one with this courage, including Tsai Ing-wen, , Biden, , or British Foreign Secretary, who dares to openly claim support for Taiwan’s independence and give Taiwan a lot of aid, and who really dares to make such a public statement, we will wait and see. These are all a bunch of guys who are so harsh and weak! I'll leave my words here today, and no one of them dares to do that.
column editor: Zhang Wu Text editor: Dong Siyun Title source: Visual China Picture editor: Su Wei
Source: Author: China Radio and Military
