Zelensky's speech was successful, US military aid continued to support, will the Russian-Ukrainian war escalate again? More than 20 days after the war broke out, Putin faced five major domestic problems that need to be solved, and rationally exploiting the "anger" of the Russian people has become one of the core work. In the face of NATO 's questioning, China responded domineeringly, sending three clear signals to the outside world.
A few days ago, Ukrainian President Zelensky's emotional speech in the US Congress achieved the desired effect. US President Biden announced on March 16 that it would provide Ukraine with 800 million US dollars in military aid, and other plans for subsequent aid are being formulated. The United States and European countries will fully support Ukraine's "invasion" operations against Russia to ensure the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of a democratic country. However, Zelensky's request to set up " no-fly zone " in Ukraine was once again rejected by NATO senior officials. NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg stressed that after consultations by NATO member states, NATO does not intend to send additional combat troops to Ukraine's air and ground, but NATO will continue to maintain its weapons and equipment assistance program to Ukraine. There is no doubt that Zelensky's speech and statement in the US Congress are undoubtedly continuing to intensify the Russian-Ukrainian conflict and have no positive help in achieving a ceasefire between the two sides.
It is obvious that Zelensky is not yet determined to be in the Yellow River. He still believes that Ukraine can turn the defeat into victory, and believes that as long as the battle can be delayed for two months, the Russian army will voluntarily withdraw its troops when it is subject to external sanctions and its own ammunition and food exhaustion. At that time, the Russian-Ukraine conflict will end completely, and Ukraine will also have the opportunity to regain the Donbass and Crimean Peninsula that were "occupied" by Russia. However, Russian President Putin obviously will not let the war continue. It should be noted that so far, the Russian army has not used heavy firepower equipment on a large scale and put the main force of the aerospace army into the battlefield. On the one hand, it is because of the constraints of the Russian army's special military operations to prevent the act of accidentally hurting the Ukrainian people. On the other hand, it is also to be wary of NATO and the United States. After all, the latter's military deployment in Europe has reached the highest scale after , the Cold War, , and the Russian army has to be guarded. Analysts believe that if the Russian army has fully opened fire, it can completely take over major cities such as Kiev and Kharkov in a short period of time and achieve effective occupation.
However, Putin still needs to solve five most difficult problems at present, because if it cannot be properly handled, Russia may become the "public enemy" of Europe. The five questions are: first, should Russia expand its special military operations to other European countries? Second, which country should Russia launch military operations next? Third, should Russia use nuclear weapon against hostile countries? Fourth, who should be responsible for Ukrainian Nazism? Fifth, to which countries should Russia extend its influence next? . These five questions actually come from a poll conducted from March 11 to 14, with a total of 1,557 Russians interviewed. In this interview, more than 90% of the Russian people supported the expansion of "special military operations" to other European countries, and the Russian people showed a very strong "hate" towards NATO countries.
It is true that Russia's special military operation in Ukraine has achieved good results, allowing the Russian people to unite and resist the all-round sanctions and suppression launched by the United States and Western countries. However, this also led to the "mental imbalance" of the Russian people, believing that the Russian army should push directly to the west. However, it should be pointed out that the Russian army itself emphasized that the actions in Ukraine were special military operations, not national-level wars. If it were the latter, NATO countries would definitely not be out of the way they are now, because they know that the Russian army's operational goals are "limited" and will not pose too much threat to them.But now the Russian people are "unbalanced in their mentality", which also makes it easy for the Russian government to be "swerable" by public opinion to do something "reluctant" and it is even likely that it will be World War III. Therefore, how to reasonably utilize the "anger" of domestic people is also one of the most important issues Putin needs to pay attention to at present.
And while Putin is dealing with the current difficult problem, NATO has started to "fire" on China again. NATO Secretary-General Stoltenberg recently declared that China, as one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council, shoulders the responsibility of supporting and maintaining international law, and should condemn Russia with countries around the world. This kind of malicious intention and attempt to pull China into the water was also immediately retorted by China's domineering retort. A spokesperson for the Chinese mission to the EU said that the Chinese people will always remember who bombed the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia. Moreover, as a trampler of international law, NATO is simply not qualified to teach victims what justice is. As a product of the Cold War and the largest military alliance in the world, NATO continues to expand its field. What role does it play in world peace and stability should reflect on itself.
In fact, it is not difficult to see from this that China's response to NATO is also sending three major signals to the outside world:
First, NATO and the United States should not stand on the commanding heights of morality and point fingers at China. Their atrocities are not qualified at all, and they are not qualified to make these demands on China. What the United States and NATO should do is to reflect on their crimes carefully.
Second, when it comes to trampling on international law, the United States and NATO recognize second, but no one dares to recognize first. Whether it is the Kosovo War that broke out in the 1990s, the Iraq War and the Afghanistan War that broke out in the early 2000s, or the Syria War and Libyan War that broke out 10 years ago, NATO and the United States are unparalleled in the attacks and aggression of other sovereign states.
Third, NATO's actions after the end of the Cold War did not have any effect on the world peace situation, but instead exacerbated regional turmoil and uneasiness. During the Ukrainian crisis, NATO not only did not dissuade him, but also repeatedly ignited the fire and continuously provided weapons and equipment and other forms of aid to Ukraine, making the conflict between Russia and Ukraine more and more intense. China has always insisted on letting Russia and Ukraine conduct exchanges and negotiations, and has made a lot of efforts to reduce the situation as soon as possible. We can say that we have a clear conscience in this regard.
