Zhou Yuko said that Ma Ying-jeou has a 1 billion vault, and the second trial was reported and apologized. (Photo source: Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News")
China Taiwan Network April 26 According to Taiwan's "China Times Electronic News", former Taiwan leader Ma Ying-jeou was dissatisfied with media person Zhou Yuke revealed that he had received political donations from Dingxin Group. Recently, the High Court sentenced Ms. Zhou to 50 days of detention and a fine of Yike to be determined. She also pointed out that the "New Taiwan Humanities and Education Foundation" donated by Ma Ying-jeou has assets of 1 billion yuan (NT$, the same below) and is Ma's campaign vault. The High Court sentenced her to clarify in the newspaper today, and the entire case can be appealed.
Zhou Girl said on January 5 and 6, 2015 that the foundation has 1 billion assets and is Ma Ying-jeou's vault, and he paid for the media advertising funds for his campaign on his behalf. She questioned the foundation's improper use of campaign subsidies, and claimed that the head of the TV station revealed to her good friend, and it was verified.
"New Taiwan Humanities and Education Foundation" filed a lawsuit and requested apologies after reporting. Zhou said that the source of the news is Wu Zijia, vice chairman of "Beautiful Island Electronic News", and Taiwan Kaili Chairman Qiu Fusheng . Qiu testified in court and slapped Zhou Yuko in the face, emphasizing that he had never told Wu and Zhou that Ma and his foundation had entrusted advertising for the election of Taiwan leaders, and that he was not aware of the situation of Ma and the foundation's advertising operation .
North Court believes that although Wu Zijia had a conversation with Zhou, the content has nothing to do with Dingxin Group and Ma Ying-jeou's improper donation issues, nor does it indicate that Ma's election balance flows to the "New Taiwan Humanities and Education Foundation." Ms. Zhou was unable to prove that the facts mentioned and allusions were true, and she had not fulfilled her obligation to make reasonable verification, and was sentenced to publish a clarification notice on the front pages of four newspapers including the China Times.
Zhou Nu appealed because of her dissatisfaction. The High Court considered the damage caused by Zhou Nu's remarks and the media published. She only had to report a clarification notice in 2 reports, and the entire case can be appealed. (China Taiwan Network Lu Jiajing)
