Tanya Tanya is a talented female singer-songwriter. She has been in the industry for more than 20 years and has won three Golden Melody Awards. Her songs can always resonate with people's true feelings. She has always been the goddess of both singing and writing in many people's

Tanya Tanya is a talented female singer-songwriter. She has been in the industry for more than 20 years and has won three Golden Melody Awards. Her songs can always resonate with people's hearts and she has always been the favorite of many people as both a singer and a composer. Goddess, but recently her new album was exposed as being suspected of plagiarism. She posted a Weibo response to the incident, which attracted great attention to the incident.

It was only after this plagiarism incident that many people discovered that this was not the first time that Tanya Tanya was suspected of plagiarism. According to incomplete statistics from netizens, 4 songs in the new album were suspected of plagiarism, not including songs from long ago. Almost all of them were suspected of plagiarism. It is Tanya Tanya's most popular song.

Red High Heels released in 2009 is Tanya Tanya's famous song, but it was revealed to have plagiarized "take it from me", "I don't understand anymore" and "gotta have you" released by The Weepies in 2006. In the eyes of ordinary listeners, the similarity of singing can be said to be 90%.

Amid the skepticism on the Internet, Tanya Chua wrote in her response on Weibo:

Although Weibo responded with a long text to explain, netizens did not buy it:

For music creators, plagiarism is a very serious matter. accusation. Many people just think it sounds similar and eagerly call it plagiarism. In fact, it is a very irresponsible approach. Many singers are helpless in the face of such accusations.

Musician Liang Huan once mentioned this situation on Weibo:

In fact, in the field of professional music, judging whether plagiarism is also a very complicated matter.

For example, there is a common international rule that "eight consecutive sections of similarity" is considered plagiarism, but it is not a strict legal standard.

In addition, there is also talk of subconscious plagiarism. Many times the creator is not sure whether I came up with it myself or heard it before, and may have used it unknowingly.

Therefore, it is an irresponsible criterion to conclude plagiarism just because it "sounds similar". A more appropriate criterion should be to analyze it from multiple perspectives such as timbre, rhythm, harmony, and orchestration.