Source: Overseas Network On October 30, the Taipei District Court ruled that 14 people should be compensated more than NT$1 million (NTD, the same below) in response to the incident in which the "Sunflower Student Movement" invaded the "Executive Yuan" and were expelled by the po

2024/04/2421:52:33 hotcomm 1418

Source: Overseas Network

Source: Overseas Network On October 30, the Taipei District Court ruled that 14 people should be compensated more than NT$1 million (NTD, the same below) in response to the incident in which the

On October 30, the Taipei District Court ruled that 14 people should be compensated more than NT$1 million (NTD, the same below) in response to the incident in which the "Sunflower Student Movement" invaded the "Executive Yuan" and were expelled by the police.

I think many people will think that this is not a big deal when they first read this news. Since you violently collide with an administrative agency, compensation is the minimum, and not being sentenced is already a high price. But I must remind everyone here to "examine the issue" carefully. It is not that the student movement thugs have to pay the police compensation, but that all Taiwan taxpayers have to compensate the illegal and violent intruders more than 1 million.

Did you hear a lot of question mark faces? violently invades administrative agencies. Not only is it not illegal, but you can also get compensation. What's the logic?

When the verdict comes out, the first person who will be most hurt is the Taiwan police. Geng Jiwen, the former Inspector General of the Taiwan Police Department, recalled the situation of the "Sunflower Student Movement" and pointed out that "the people led by Tsai Ing-wen and Su Zhenchang blocked, humiliated and attacked the police, resulting in nearly 200 police injuries, and even shields, batons and other equipment were stolen. The out-of-control crowd took it away." Unexpectedly, after the incident, the police had to compensate the rioters, but the rioters did not bear any responsibility for the injured police officers.

In Geng's narrative, he specifically accused Tsai Ing-wen, Su Zhenchang and others of their evil deeds, but he may not have realized that these people were one of the "important basis" for the court to make such a ridiculous judgment.

Tsai Ing-wen and the Democratic Progressive Party were not only the instigators and biggest beneficiaries of the "Sunflower" incident, but after taking office, they quickly seized control of the incident just like the statement on the small advertisement that "the final right of interpretation belongs to the merchant." Definition right.

html On May 20, the Tsai Ing-wen administration came to power. On May 23, the then "Executive President" Lin Quan withdrew the criminal charges against 126 "Sunflower" defendants. Violent collision is not guilty; illegal intrusion is not guilty; taking advantage of the chaos and stealing is not guilty. The mob all received "amnesty", and "leading figures" such as Huang Guochang, Lin Feifan, and Chen Weiting even took advantage of the "Sunflower" opportunity to enter the political arena.

Hong Kong thugs may be extremely happy to see this verdict. In Taiwan under the rule of the Democratic Progressive Party, "beating, smashing, and looting" is not only a "beautiful scenery", but more likely to become a "career line for making a fortune."

Compared with the average monthly salary of ordinary employees in Taiwan of 38,000 (the average real monthly salary of all employees in Taiwan’s industrial and service industries in 2018, the data comes from the Taiwan Statistics Department), one can get a million in compensation for one violent activity, and the income is really considerable.

In fact, this more than 1 million is still a "discounted price." After the "Sunflower Student Movement", 29 people including former "Taiwan Federation Party Legislator" Zhou Ni'an filed this compensation lawsuit against the Taipei City Government and the Taipei City Government Police Department. The requested joint compensation was as high as 830. More than 10,000 yuan. The Taipei District Court’s first-instance verdict of 1.11157 million yuan was regarded as a 13% discount.

Some people from the Democratic Progressive Party argued that it would take 14 people to pay more than 1 million yuan, and each person would pay tens of thousands of yuan, which is not much. This kind of argument that secretly changes the concept further reveals the ignorance and shamelessness of the DPP politicians. If you pay for something that is right, 1 million is not much; if you pay for something that is wrong, even a dime is a mistake.

The Tsai Ing-wen authorities put politics above the rule of law and the law. If it is good for me, everything will be fine; if it is not good for me, we will pursue him to the end. The Democratic Progressive Party, which has already been in power once, lacks the righteousness and responsibility of those in power. Instead, it is filled with the hostility, banditry and evil spirit of the opposition, and its selfishness has become the biggest cancer that disrupts the rule of law in Taiwan. (Text/Big Fish in the Deep Sea)

This article is a copyrighted work and any unauthorized reproduction is strictly prohibited. Follow the "Hong Kong and Taiwan Tune" WeChat official account to browse more news and in-depth interpretations of Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao.

hotcomm Category Latest News