declare that the above paragraph comes from Baidu , and the following is what I want to describe.
Aegon and his sisters led three dragons and an army to conquer the continent. He built the Iron Throne with the sharp sword he threw down by his enemy's surrender as a symbol of his power. Power comes from conquest by force and from the fire-breathing dragon, which is the powerful and barbaric side of power.
I have never heard of any serious violations of human rights in the seven major countries, nor have I heard of any kingdom invading other countries, causing disaster. The war Aegon launched had no justification, nor did he have a natural sense of justice. No one could defeat others, and in the end he had to surrender to Aegon and transformed from seven countries into one country (it is said that he did not conquer , dorn at that time, so strictly speaking, it was considered "two countries"). This is a bit like the Qin Dynasty unifying the six countries and unifying force, and there is no reason to say.
Another off-topic sentence: Is Qin unified the six countries good or bad? It seems like a good thing to unify a nation into a country and avoid conquests between the original countries. In a unified country like ours, there are dynasties and dynasties, but every change is basically flooded with war and life is in vain. Cao Cao has a poem in " Traveling to the Hayao " "White bones are exposed in the wild, and there is no rooster crowing thousands of miles away. One hundred people is left alone, and the thoughts are broken by people's hearts." You must have compassion when reading history, just read some heroic and beautiful women or gossip stories, and then the book will be in vain. "Food is the most important thing for the people." If you look into this sentence in depth, you may be able to see the numerous bones hidden behind the various guises that deceive the world.
With its super combat power, Aegon established the Targaryen dynasty , built the Iron Throne, and thus opened an era of unity. The throne was passed to the Crazy King. During the chaos caused by Leanna, he killed the father and brother of Ed Stark, which triggered a war and died and destroyed the country. From the later narrative of "Ringslayer" James , I learned that the Crazy King wanted to burn the entire King's Landing City with wild fire, so James killed the Crazy King.
From this matter, on the one hand, James is worthy of the title of "Knight", and such a "regicide" can be understood by everyone (if Ed understands the whole story, I believe he will respect James); on the other hand, he can see the crazy side of the Crazy King. He even used the entire King's Landing City to bury himself with him even though he knew that he was unable to save the defeat. A sovereign person would not consider the life and death of the people. Such a crazy king sitting on the Iron Throne is equivalent to placing the entire kingdom on the crater, and the eruption of the volcano is only a matter of time. The longer you sit on the Iron Throne, the more dangerous the kingdom is.
From the plot, Ed seems to want to get into the Iron Throne (this is Cersei's statement, "The step forward is yours"), but Robert sat on that chair.
In my opinion, both of them lack the ability to govern the world. Robert is too good at enjoying life. Women, fine wine and hunting are his favorites. Not getting Leanna is just an excuse. Of course, an unfortunate marriage still has a great influence on a person. Perhaps marrying Lyanna will be different. At least the wind direction of the pillow side wind varies greatly. Robert may have the opportunity to become a wise master. In that case, Lyanna may have a higher contribution. These are all unknown things.
As a king, you must have enough wisdom to distinguish between responsibility and recklessness, and weigh the pros and cons in radicalism and compromise. "The son of a daughter cannot sit in the hall." A player like Robert who likes to chase wild boars everywhere, except for his courage and courage, I really don't think this is worthy (on the other hand, people must have some hobbies. Don't drink alcohol during intense exercise, especially strong alcohol. Perhaps this is the lesson Robert deserves).
Ed, brave, has a strong sense of responsibility and honor. The blood of the ancestors was bleeding, and the death sentence was sentenced to . . He had to listen to the prisoner's last words and chop off his head with his own hands. It is believed that if this cannot be done, the criminal may not die.What a high-level view, it seems to be of practical significance to now. A person's right to life should not be easily deprived. Similar to the law of abolishing the death penalty, it is a manifestation of respecting the right to life.
As the manager of Northbound , Ed seems to have done a good job. I have some questions, is it that the people in the cold areas also simpler and simpler, so it is easier to rule. In this regard, the difference between Junlin City and Winterfell City and is huge. The Prime Minister and the Guardian of the North are also two completely different positions.
After Ed became Prime Minister, he actually said that he would fight Old Tywin for a war because the farmers complained about the robbery of Demon Mountain. This shows how he lacked the wisdom of a politician. Of course it is necessary to preside over justice, but it is enough to deal with Demon Mountain. There is no need to bring Tywin to mind, even if Tywin is behind the scenes. The struggle should have strategies and whether it is good or not. Fortunately, he wasn't on the Iron Throne, otherwise he wouldn't be better than Robert.
Joffrey Everyone has seen it. He is the prince, he has no sense of honor, and his vanity is strong enough. He acts weirdly and has a weird temperament (I haven't figured out why he shot Rose, a prostitute), sitting on the Iron Throne is a disaster. I believe that when he was poisoned, 99.999% of people applauded. The reason why they didn't say 100% is that they had to consider the factors of a mother like Cersei, plus one or two alternatives. This is a very strange thing. It seems that something so clear is that there are always unexpected events. But if it is another thing, it may be a completely opposite situation.
Previously, I saw a drunk man stepping on the national flag and urinating at the scene of the incident and being arrested. Statement: I didn’t read the detailed report, I only read a similar topic. I don’t know what other ugly things this drunkard has done, but since he is a drunkard, why should he take it so seriously? If the drunkard shouts "kill whoever he has killed", can it be evidence of his murder? I began to suspect that the proportion of the people who previously said accounted for 99.999% was even higher, and there would be a few more "9" later.
On the one hand, "the eyes of the people are bright", and on the other hand, "the truth is often in the hands of a few people". It seems that everything has two sides, and even God and the devil are no exception. I saw a picture two days ago, and the text on it was quite shocking. "In the final analysis, this world is a contest between God and the devil. All living beings just choose to take sides. This matter seems simple, but if you only distinguish between God and the devil, some people will spend their entire lives." It is so difficult to distinguish because the devil tries to cover up his true face, and he says something kind and amiable, as if he is the real God, confusing the world.
Torman is a good kid, but unfortunately he is too young to afford such a chaotic kingdom.
When Cersei sat on the Iron Throne, the situation was getting more and more chaotic. If it were in the era of peace, Cersei might be a good ruler, a master of power struggle, at least he would not have made his kingdom full of smoke and fragmented. Cersei should have enough wisdom in this regard (as opposed to calling it "wrist"), just as she followed the advice of octopus spider Varis decided to send Ed to the Great Wall of Desperate, and would not insert Ed's head on the spear and hang it at the gate of the city like her stupid son.
Use a popular saying on the Internet, "IQ is a flaw". As an evaluation of Joffrey, it is quite appropriate, but it is just an evaluation. I have written an article about Joffrey alone, analyzing his emotional intelligence, IQ, and his changes before and after becoming king. It's strange, I even think he has been abnormal since childhood. It's hard to guarantee that his values are not caused by spoiling and power.
Iron Throne has never been a comfortable chair, and even if you sit on it, you may not be able to lean your back on the back of the chair. It is a warning to the king, but unfortunately many people who sit on it do not understand and think that they can do whatever they want with the highest power.
Lord Varis' riddle is very interesting. The king, the priest, the rich (with a bag of money) and a mercenary are together. Everyone wants to order the mercenaries to kill the other two people. Who can survive in the end? There is no clear answer, but the king's commands, the priests' under the name of God, and the wealthy's money may not be very effective. What really determines their destiny is the mercenaries and the sword in his hand.
Another example, when Old Tywin rode a horse (note: it was "riding a horse"! "riding a horse"! I will repeat it twice) entered the throne hall, and the horse was still pulling shit at the door. At that time, who thought that the king's power was greater than the prime minister's power? ! Power is in the hands of the strong, and bloodline is just an excuse to claim the source of power, and has never been real power. Even people like Liu Bei who are known as the "Emperor Uncle" have to rely on Zhuge Liang to plan to divide the world in and rely on their generals to compete for a place in the conquest.
Let me add to the theory of bloodline. Targaryen family believes that they are the masters of the Iron Throne because they were the dynasty founded by their ancestor Aegon. But a dynasty with one surname will always end one day. The cry for "Long live long live long live long live long" sounded again, and few people could live to a hundred years old, just like the dynasty. No matter how wise a king is, he cannot guarantee that his sons, grandchildren and great-grandchildren will be born... they are shrewd and capable people who can steer the kingdom.
Targaryen family has ruled for nearly three hundred years, and Baratheon family is similar to the Qin Dynasty and died in the second lifetime. It is said that after Qin unified the world, he called himself the "First Emperor", thinking that the country was forever solid, and his descendants could enjoy the world forever, and for two, three, and four generations... I am afraid that he would not even imagine his fate with the stinky fish, let alone such a distant future, which is just wishful thinking.
Compared with the values of modern society, "sovereignty lies with the people", the theory of bloodline is just the argument of the dynasty and should be swept into the dust of history, and its absurdity is not to be repeated. Let me say one more thing, because Joffrey, Myrcella, and Toman are all illegitimate children of Cersei and James, after his death, the Iron Throne is basically someone else's. From this perspective, the Baratheon family died in one lifetime and had no heirs.
Not everyone can sit on the Iron Throne. Little finger devotes its whole life, and it is useless to sit on it. James sat on it for a while, but I believe he shouldn't have the idea of being a king.
Our cute male and female protagonists, Snow doesn't want to be any king, Dragon Mother has been thinking about the Iron Throne, but unfortunately I don't know the real ending in the book yet.
In a recent picture, I saw Mr. Martin, with a chubby figure and a white beard. I heard that he had not finished the sixth part, but wrote a prequel. The old man may not have even decided who to sit on that chair, so it is useless for us to be anxious. It is rumored that the old man prefers Sam. I guess he may be the same size and wisdom, so it may be that he can support Sam onto the Iron Throne.
Since there is no eternal "ruling person" (Jiang Jingguo said "there is no eternal ruling party"), what's wrong with Sam to try it?
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-