The Egyptians opposed the view that Egyptian civilization has only been for more than 5,000 years, and believed that it was a product of modern Western-centrism.
Under the perspectives of Egyptian MZism and African-centrism, the West not only did not praise the promotion of ancient Egyptian , but instead deliberately suppressed and belittled ancient Egyptian civilization. In fact, some people strongly oppose the questioning and even abandoning the records of Egyptian civilization by Western scholars today. The records of Egyptian documents are also a skeptical approach.
On the contrary, they still insist on the concept passed down from ancient times, believing that modern Egyptology 's interpretation of ancient Egyptian civilization is evil, and complaining that the orthodox academic community (referring to the Western academic community) monopolized the interpretation power of ancient Egyptian civilization.
Although the modern Egyptians have no cultural heritage connection with Ancient Egyptians, they believe that the modern Western academic community has intentionally shortened the historical year of ancient Egypt.
Egypt is regarded as the oldest country since ancient times. This is not an invention of modern Western countries. Archaeology is just a proof.
"Narmai" and "Menice" appear repeatedly and alternately in the seal text
World history works written by ancient historians usually start with Egyptian history , from Ancient Greek to Ottoman . Ancient Egypt was never forgotten in ancient times as some rumors, and was then rediscovered in modern times. Egyptology only provides a new perspective and new method to understand ancient Egypt, and reconstructs the image of ancient Egypt (and it has been criticized by the conservatives for this).
The proof of the ancient Egyptian dynasty is based on unearthed documents from the same period, and it is not Manetto that Egyptologists believe whatever they say.
No dynasty in ancient Egypt can exist without writing materials. The "dynasty" in the ancient Egyptian context is a concept determined by a series of kings. These kings either have sequence relationships or can be confirmed with the late king tables, and generally speaking, their king identity is determined by the king's title mark.
The proof method of China that compares the size of the city site, the specifications of the tomb, and the combination of ritual instruments and is not important in Egypt! This is because the 31 dynasties in ancient Egypt and later periods all belong to the research scope of historical archaeology, unlike , Xia Dynasty, and Early Shang can only be classified into the original historical period and must rely on prehistoric archaeology research methods.
Chinese archaeology loves to prove the classics and supplement history. It is world-famous, even Egyptian studies have heard of it, and this set of ideas and methods will evoke ancient memories of Egyptian studies. This was how Amelino did in the recognition of the nature of the tomb group of Umkaber B!
Before the 19th century Egyptology also used the Bible and Greek Ancient History as reference to find content that could correspond to archaeological data. However, in modern times, Egyptian scholars have long been no longer persistent in proving the authenticity of a certain dynasty in the legend. Some even proposed to abolish the traditional dynasty historical system and completely reconstruct the order of ancient Egyptian dynasty from newly discovered archaeological documents and cultural relics.
Nationalists in Egypt opposed the view that Egyptian civilization had only been for more than 5,000 years, and believed that it was a product of modern Western-centricism, because according to ancient documents, Egyptian civilization did not begin in the First Dynasty. The ancients believed that Egyptian history had at least tens of thousands of years.
Modern Egyptians believe that Westerners deliberately shorten the length of Egyptian civilization and deny that modern Egypt's inheritance of the pharaoh civilization was a carefully planned conspiracy. The brain circuit was exactly the same as that of nationalists in China, as if paranoid attacks were on.
Egyptian scholars recently accused ancient Egypt of the view that it was black civilization. Eurocentrism, African-centrism, and Chinese-centrism are all attacking ancient Egypt, so they are so innocent.
is unique, Sima Qian also records a history span of 3,000 years. Like Manetto, they did not distinguish between history and myth in their respective works, and the ancients generally did not distinguish between the two. Trying to discover real history from ancient myths, there are still people in the West doing this, but their views have been marginalized!
Even in the late Qing Dynasty, the Chinese knew that Egypt was a thousand-year-old country.Since ancient times, Egypt has been regarded as a ten thousand-year-old country, many people do not accept the saying "five thousand-year-old civilization". In the eyes of Egyptian conspiracy theorists, the so-called Egyptian 5 thousand-year-old civilization is a conspiracy used by the West to suppress Egypt, or the official is deliberately covering up the existence of ancient alien civilizations.
Don’t think that “ Eastern Zhou or above has no credibility history” is specifically targeted by the West, and Europe and the United States are not more tolerant of other countries. In the 30 dynasties recorded by Manetto in Egypt, Westerners initially directly denied the first 15 dynasties, believing that “ New Kingdom has no credibility history” before. Christianity is afraid of Egypt's ancient nature, and an Egypt that is too old will challenge the authority of the Bible chronology.
This fear has existed more than a thousand years ago. When facing the surprising ancient Egyptian history in Manetto's "History of Egypt", Christian scholars desperately denied the correctness of the records in "History of Egypt" and strived to adapt to biblical chronology. However, it is precisely because they quoted fragments of "History of Egypt" in this process that this precious information has been partially preserved to this day. In addition, the Egyptian chronology has been revised many times since the 19th century. So in fact, Egyptian history has been shortened rather than lengthened by Egyptologists.
According to Manetto, the earliest dynasty in Egypt was the God Dynasty, followed by the Demigod Dynasty and the Undead Dynasty [15], and then the first, second, third... dynasty. Therefore, although the first dynasty is known as the "first", it is actually ranked fourth in Manetto's dynasty history, and there is still tens of thousands of years of history before it!
Nowadays, the West does not mention those mythical dynasties in Egypt, but until the Ptolemaic dynasty, the ancient Egyptians still claimed that the Egyptian temple was built on drawings left by the ancient sage kings (those kings before the First Dynasty).
It is like the Chinese used "Yao, Heaven, Shun, Sun" to describe the peaceful and prosperous era. When the Egyptian lamented the current social situation, they would use statements such as " Horus era" and "the era of the Great Nine Gods" (the Horus era was the ancient golden age in the Egyptian concept, and "evil and crime are not yet known").
The concept of "Yanhuang descendants" can also be found in ancient Egypt. Traditionally, all Egyptian kings had common ancestors, and they were called "the souls of Peh and Nehheng", which is the king of the undead dynasty that Maneto called.
Everyone has the myth of ancestors, and of course the Egyptians also have their own " Three Sovereigns and Five Emperors ". Who would think that their history was too long? China is not as special as some people think.
Ancient China is actually very similar to ancient Egypt.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-