China has a long history of 5000 years, and some celebrities' deeds will be adapted into dramas by later generations, and they have been performed countless times among the people. Some things will be adapted by some famous writers, and the celebrities in the story have been discredited by them for thousands of years. As a result, some stories have become more widely spread and changed in taste, and the image of celebrities has been hit hard. In ancient history, there are also these three lies, which have deceived people for a long time. In fact, the characters in them were not originally like this.
1. Chen Shimei abandoned his wife and abandoned son
In folk tales, everyone hates Chen Shimei because he abandoned it. The wife of the chaos, and worried that his wife will bring her son to find him, it will affect his luck and the road to Qingyun, so he sent a killer to get rid of them, but in the end, the incident happened and ended in a slash. In fact, after decades of research by the elderly Tong Delun, Chen Shimei in history was a loyal minister who was honest, upright, and aware of the sentiments of the people, not what people imagined, so this story of Chen Shimei is also false.
2. Pan Jinlian and Ximenqing
In the impression of many people, Pan Jinlian and Wu Dalang are a pair, but she He didn't love him, and instead he was with Ximen Qing. The stories of the two have been talked about in the streets and alleys for thousands of years. But Pan Jinlian is not such a woman. In the official history, she is from a famous family, and she is also a daughter of the Zhizhou family in the Ming Dynasty. She is reasonable, gentle and dignified. She has always had a deep affection with Wu Dalang (ie Wu Zhi) and his wife. There is no such story invented by posterity, so this is also a lie.
3. Burning the book pits
As we all know, history is written by victors, and it is included in many modern history books. It is said that Qin Shihuang's greatest failure was to burn books and confuse Confucianism. In fact, there is such a record in the earliest "Historical Records": "As of the quarter of Qin, burning poetry and books, pitting sorcerers, the six arts have been lacking since then." What is written here is the pit warlock, and there is no mention of Confucian scholars, and Qin Shihuang's pit warlock is for a reason. He was looking for the elixir of life, but was abducted by the group of warlocks to pay back the money and escaped. Therefore, Qin Shihuang sent people to find this group of warlocks who were still chewing their tongues in the restaurant, and killed them in a rage.
In the late Western Han Dynasty, it became like this in Kong Anguo's "Preface to Shangshu": "When Emperor Qin Shihuang destroyed the ancient classics, burned books and confided scholars, scholars in the world could not escape and disband." The burning of books and Confucianism also originated from this. The more and more a passage spreads, the more it spreads, the more it spreads, and it changes its flavor. What's more, is it written by later generations who have changed dynasties? The "burning of books" ordered the burning of some of the folk collections because it was a need under the rule of the Qin Dynasty, but it did not burn important books such as medicine, agriculture and animal husbandry. There was also a set of books in the royal library, but they were all turned into ashes when Xiang Yu burned the palace of Qin.
