A retired teacher friend was reported for making up lessons for two children at home. The reason for
's report is also quite incredible.
said that a retired teacher is also a teacher and should not be paid to make up lessons.
On this matter, it has been around for half a month.
As for the result, although it will not hurt the muscles and bones, it is not good after all.
At first, I even teased him and asked him if the tuition fee for supervising people was too high.
As a result, I found out after this question, he only charged 100 yuan for a two-hour class for a special mathematics teacher like him.
And in order to ensure the effect, the Communist Party also accepted three students.
As for the identities of these three students, they are still the children of the students he taught in his youth.
To put it bluntly, what kind of paid supplementary lesson is this, it is obviously a gift.
But it may be that the tree attracts the wind, or it may be that some people hate others.
After all, the old man failed to live in peace after retirement.
To be honest, I really don't understand these people whose eyes are always fixed on the teacher to make up lessons.
also don't understand why the education department always emphasizes that teachers are forbidden to make up lessons outside of school.
Is there really any big problem with the teacher making up lessons outside of school?
Who is questioning, who is in the back
In the past few years, some people reported that some teachers "do not give lectures after class" .
This kind of thing should exist.
Because the profession of teacher, although it is a relatively high-quality group among many professions, there are more people, and it is inevitable that there will be individual black sheep.
and the formation of an atmosphere,It may become a regional phenomenon.
So when someone makes similar complaints, I don't find it too strange.
However, the requirements of the education department are for all teachers.
If you look at the industry from the perspective of teachers, what percentage of teachers really are what parents say?
I think it will not be too big, it may even be very small.
After all, in the network environment, emotions are amplified.
When parents turn on the computer and become omnipotent "netizens", their influence is also huge.
Teachers who "do not talk after class" must have the courage to be so unscrupulous?
Take ten thousand steps back.
I don't believe in any way that those teachers who make physical education teachers "temporary trouble" all the year round will use paid supplementary lessons outside the school as their main income increase channel.
But after the voice of doubt was amplified, the teacher could not bear the pressure after all.
left them the only choice, and they had to be cautious in their words and actions while forcibly carrying the pot on their backs.
Then I want to ask, who on earth gave this "pot" to the teacher?
"One-leg" burden reduction
The slogan of burden reduction has been chanted for 30 years.
As for the result, everyone has also seen it.
Students are getting tired.
Even though the length of time at school has been reduced and the frequency of examinations has been reduced, the extracurricular tutoring class is standing there. Are you still not attending?
That must be on.
because no matter how the school education is compressed,The requirements for the high school entrance examination and the college entrance examination have not changed.
If you think about these two hurdles, you will have to spend your spare time to make up for it.
But we have to know that the amount of this kind of independent tuition, is not entirely based on the characteristics of the students, but is related to the parents' educational anxiety.
Given the opportunity that education can really change destiny, who can guarantee that one can "lie down" without anxiety?
You say you have a good mentality, but it's useless.
Because the best marketing method of the extracurricular tutoring class is "I give you anxiety, and then I have medicine here" .
Look at the following admissions promotion, are you really not at all anxious?
The burden reduction reduces the school learning, but does not reduce the extra school tuition.
This "one-leg" burden reduction does not seem to have any effect in solving the needs of students' burdens.
has spawned the booming K12 education industry and online education in full swing.
If the teachers outside the school are indeed higher than the teachers in the school, then I also agree.
But by comparison, I found out that it turned out to be a "one win, three lose" account.
Forbid teachers to make up lessons outside school? "One win and three losses"
When I was a student, before high school, I was also made up by the teacher in my class.
The supplementary tuition fee is very low.
In the case of the whole class attending, after removing the rent, it may not be enough for the teacher to pay the utility bill at the house.
But in that era when there were few supplementary materials, the effect of this kind of extra-school supplementary lessons was immediate.
Because the teacher understands each student's shortcomings too well.
And as a teacher who has been teaching for many years,Their experience and understanding of the syllabus, not to mention their level is much higher than that of part-time tutors, is at least a mature teaching system.
So if you compare the learning efficiency, the student will obviously not be the one who benefits.
In terms of economy, if the teachers in the school pay extra lessons outside the school, the cost will not be too high.
After all, the student base is there.
If we follow the method of making up the lessons based on checking the deficiencies and making up the leakage, the cost evenly spread to each student is not much higher than that of mine.
is at least much lower than the cost of an outside tutoring agency, which costs hundreds of thousands a year.
Over the years, many teachers have complained about low wages.
If you can really allow them to make up lessons for students under reasonable limits, wouldn't the problem be solved to a certain extent?
But the result is the opposite.
Teachers can only continue to complain about their salary, parents can only contribute to anxiety infinitely, while students still can't see the end of burden reduction.
However, it seems that only outside tutoring organizations that are "bigger and stronger" are the ones who are happy to see this.
Isn't this just forcing the "wool" to grow on the "dog", and then let the "pig" pay the bill.
written at the end
These days I have been thinking about those who are holding on to school teachers against the example, whether they are parents or external tutoring organizations.
If such a voice is really made by people with ulterior motives, then our students have really been trapped by them over the years.
In my opinion,There is no one-size-fits-all solution to the problem of teachers paying extra lessons outside school.
Because if someone is determined to make this money, they may not be able to manage it.
Perhaps taking the delayed service after class as an opportunity, letting teachers approach students more and return to the podium more is a feasible way to solve the burden of students' learning and reduce the financial burden of parents and teachers.
.
