Recently I saw a media report saying that after the introduction of new anti-addiction rules, it successfully reduced the number of underage players by 39 million. The report introduced this successful moment very excitedly.
Indeed, as a gamer, I can feel the anti-addiction effect.
Not to mention popular games like King Glory, even stand-alone games like Subway Parkour are very difficult for minors to play. It can be seen that anti-addiction is successful in reducing underage players.
But this success is short-term in my opinion. It seems to be a success, but it actually fails because it provokes a bad head.
So anti-addiction is not as highly praised by parents as said on the Internet.
On the contrary, most parents use practical actions to oppose this mechanism.
The real slaps those who say anti-addiction is the result of parents’ reporting and suggestions.
The parents of these underage players are most likely born in the 1980s or 1990s. Many parents of this generation grew up playing games, and they do not think that playing games will have a bad impact on their children.
Many people say that instead of letting children play games, it is better to cultivate other hobbies for children, but this statement completely ignores reality.
Because games are very cheap, time-saving entertainment and fun, , you said it doesn’t cost money to take your children to travel and train them to learn piano and dance?
Compared with games, other interests obviously consume more time and money.
That’s why this kind of thing finally appears. It’s obviously a good measure to prevent children from becoming addicted.
As a result, parents were unwilling to cooperate, but instead took the initiative to let their children play.
I learned from most parents I know in real life that the reason for doing this is because games are a convenient tool for managing children.
Online Such a small group of people has influenced the policies of the entire game market.
anti-addiction seems to have succeeded in reducing the number of players, but minors have returned in another way.
reflects that the current anti-addiction measures are too strict and have not helped most parents very well.
What do you think about the phenomenon of parents letting their children play games under their own identities? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.
