The New York Times gave The Wandering Earth 2 a score of 30. The Wandering Earth 2 is out of the ordinary. The New York Times gave such a low score most likely because they think they have different views on the movie. Collectivism is not recognized in the Western world, and sacr

The New York Times gave The Wandering Earth 2 30 points, The Wandering Earth 2 was out of the circle. Personally, after seeing it, the photo is really good. I wouldn’t give it 30 points. I think it’s definitely 80 points. The New York Times gave such a low score most likely because they think they have different views on the movie. Collectivism is not recognized in the Western world, and sacrificing some people for the majority of people is difficult to accept in their concepts, especially the situation in the movie where people actively line up to sacrifice on the pole, so the evaluation is subjective and biased. But we know that what our country has promoted since ancient times is this spirit of sacrificing the individual to achieve the greater. In our consciousness, this is a great symbol, just like those dead national heroes. Therefore, this movie can be regarded as a movie with the export of Chinese culture, and even a challenge to other countries' ideologies. However, any country has cultural exports. Film evaluation should put aside these prejudices and only look at the film itself to make an objective evaluation. The only disharmonious thing about this movie in my eyes is that Zhou Zhezhi, played by Li Xuejian teacher. After Andy Lau's Tu Hengyu's vital signs disappeared, everyone desperately wanted to go back and say their final goodbyes to their families, but Zhou Zhezhi said, "I believe it, and I hope everyone believes it is okay," and organized the staff to leave. This is actually very unreasonable. Your vital signs are gone. Where does your confidence come from? This seems a bit blind and metaphysical. If it were replaced at this time, the meteorite still has three days to fall, but there are still a few minutes before launch. Why not take a few minutes from the three days to see if there is any miracle? I believe this approach will be more reasonable. But overall it's still good. As for the pros and cons of collectivism and individualism, it is an eternal question in itself. It cannot change because of a movie. So forget the political tendency and look at this movie objectively. You will find that it is actually not bad.