The Lao Rongzhi case finally came to a trial again. This trial was just two situations. The first is to pronounce the verdict. There are only two situations when Lao Rongzhi either maintains the original verdict or is not guilty in court.

Lao Rongzhi The case finally arrived again. This trial was just two situations. The first is to pronounce the verdict. There are only two situations when Lao Rongzhi either maintains the original verdict or is not guilty in court. In addition, it is sent back for retrial, and then re-convicted after retrial, so whether Lao Rongzhi dies or lives depends on tomorrow.

And whether she was sentenced to death sentence or life imprisonment or fixed-term imprisonment will not give you an answer tomorrow, but it is obvious that if sent back to retrial, at least Lao Rongzhi will not be sentenced to death. This is what Wu Danhong fought for her. As long as she was sentenced to uphold the original verdict in court, Wu Danhong will win.

From the bottom of my heart, I don’t believe that Lao Rongzhi killed 7 people because I believe that human nature is truth, goodness and beauty. I think that everyone is kind, and no one wants to harm others. Only when they have to, or are threatened by others, and have bad objective conditions can people go to extremes. Therefore, I firmly believe that human nature is good, Lao Rongzhi must have been forced to do things that should not be done under the coercion of Faziying .

And those so-called 7 people who were killed by Lao Rongzhi can only be said to be killed because of her reasons. It cannot be said that Lao Rongzhi was subjectively trying to kill these 7 people. Lao Rongzhi could not predict that these 7 people would be killed by Fa Ziying by her in a rental house. She might simply think that Fa Ziying just wanted to rob the money, and the person would let it go after the money was obtained.

And these people have problems themselves. If these people stay at home, or go to work well, cook for their wives, tutor their daughters, watch TV with their parents, instead of going to romantic places, having corrupt lives, degenerate thoughts, messing with men and women, and trying to have dirty and illegal sexual relationships with Lao Rongzhi, will they be killed?

Could you please ask some people? Is this kind of scumbag, or a shameless man who treats marriage and family as a joke, and is no different from an animal in estrus, worthy of sympathy? Even if you have sex with Lao Rongzhi, Lao Rongzhi is definitely not willing to do so, and it is against her subjective will. Therefore, these people are rapists, and rapists should receive condemnation from society, that is, there is still plenty of death. I also advise those wives who have died, that your men have betrayed you, and you will also say the so-called "justice" to him. Is it a "showing" mind?

And those who clamor online every day that Lao Rongzhi must die. What does Lao Rongzhi's life and death have to do with you? Has your husband been seduced by her? Life is precious and the most precious. Women are also relatively vulnerable. Of course, for those women who abduct children and sell drugs, we will never tolerate them and should be severely punished. Just like a woman who sells more than 20 children, she said after she was sentenced to death that her children should live? Someone actually sympathized with her and said that all mothers in the world should forgive her. What is your logic?

Some people also say, what would you do if your husband was killed? If I were a woman, if my husband went to prostitution or had an improper relationship with other men, my only hope was that he would not die well. Not only did I not let my hatred on Lao Rongzhi, but I would sing praises to her. Anything that goes against me is called pretending to be 13.

Is Lao Rongzhi a good person? As she said herself, the law will not wrongly accuse a good person, and we do not have this judgment. People are not divided into good or bad. You said that a thief secretly gave his wife a bread to eat. Is this person a good person or a bad person? Good people will be punished even if they break the law. The law only looks at evidence, regardless of whether you are a good person or a bad person.

Whether Lao Rongzhi killed someone or did it himself, it doesn’t matter whether he killed someone indirectly or took it himself. As long as there is evidence, imagination and so-called reasoning are all detective novels, not reality, reasoning is a means of criminal investigation, not a standard for sentence.I am very disgusted with some lawyers. In order to cater to the public opinion on the Internet, they shouted that Lao Rongzhi would die without a doubt and would not change the judgment. I also despise these people very much. I think that they are the so-called positive energy and have a positive view. In fact, these people are no different from me. I said that Lao Rongzhi would not die. They said that Lao Rongzhi would definitely die, and they found a lot of majors to prove that they are actually all taking advantage of traffic. The click rate of their posts is not as good as mine. Why? Because I use a famous saying on Douyin to say, "I believe you, a ghost."

The final answer will be revealed at 11 o'clock tomorrow. Many people will broadcast live on Douyin . In fact, this case has been very clear since the beginning. Lao Rongzhi will at least not die, but if she is sent back to retrial, she may not know how long it will take to be tried. In fact, Lao Rongzhi is said to be exhausted and sick. She may not be sentenced to death without the court. She will be dead. This is what is called justice that will only be late, but will not be absent.