Which man can tolerate this? So since March this year, Wang has only been willing to pay the child support. His ex-wife immediately filed a lawsuit with a lawsuit to the court, demanding that he fulfill his payment obligations in accordance with the agreement.
This lawsuit also revealed many secrets of his ex-wife's family, such as their family suspected of drug use, domestic violence and cheating scandals, etc. Of course, no direct evidence was presented, and it was only time to stop. After all, there are still children's problems that have not been resolved, and both parties should leave some face to each other.
But netizens expressed their anger about Wang being the sucker and paying high child support to raise his ex-wife and the whole family. They all supported Wang to find a way to regain the custody of the child and ask the woman to pay the child support in turn. Some even shouted that he had established an ex-wife with an independent queen character, and moved out of his ex-husband's mansion, buying a house by himself or asking his new husband to buy it.
Of course, the idea is good, but from a legal perspective, it is difficult to achieve. The agreement was in her hands. No matter what method she used at that time, she asked Wang to sign this unequal agreement and deceived Wang's trust. As a Beijing man, Wang herself is in love with her children or has love for her ex-wife. The agreement has been signed, and it is said that it has been fair. If she wants to correct it, unless the woman agrees, or the man has evidence that she is unable to support such a high fee, she requires a reduction.
But at present, it is obvious that both ways will not work. Wang’s mistake was that he did not listen to the lawyer’s opinions and believed too much of his ex-wife’s performance, which caused the current extremely passive situation.
In order to prevent Wang from fighting for custody of the child, his ex-wife even blocked Wang and her family from visiting the child for various reasons. Although the agreement was for joint supervision, it was obvious that due to distance, the conditions for joint supervision could not be realized. Anyone with a discerning eye can understand at once that a child is Wang’s weakness. As long as the custody of the child is in the hands of his ex-wife, the ex-wife can constantly let his ex-husband transfusions to him on this ground.
The key is that from the paid bills that Wang exposed, the fees given by Wang are not fixed, and many of them are reimbursed, that is, the fees given each month are not fixed, which gives the ex-wife more reasons to claim higher child support. This agreement is actually very dangerous.
Especially now that the ex-wife has remarried, the expenses to be reimbursed for these unfixed expenses will only be more or less. Wang must have understood that he has been cheated and wants to change the agreement. But now my ex-wife is just holding on to the agreement: You signed it in black and white, you said I promised not to remarry. Do you have any evidence? Besides, remarriage is my freedom, and you have no right to restrict me.
Legally, this is true, but why do people feel so disgusted? It is said that you are not short of money. Your ex-husband gave you so much after your divorce. Now you pay the mortgage for you. The water, electricity, nanny and driver at home are all responsible for you. Isn’t it just to make you and your children live a better life? But you remarried in a blink of an eye and brought back a mama baby boy who was in his fifties and still not married. Your daughter is almost ten years old. Do you let your daughter be under the same roof as such a person? Don’t you worry about her safety?
You are always in the mood to show your love with your current employee, so you have never seen your child posthumously posting your child after marriage, and you don’t see where you are willing to take care of your child. The child is just a bargaining chip for your ex-husband to ask for high child support. The child was raised by his ex-husband. Where can you find such a long-term meal ticket?
It’s a pity that the agreement was signed and it was too late. When my ex-wife signed the divorce agreement, she of course hired a lawyer to evaluate it. It must have protected her own interests to the greatest extent, and it was even ruled out that she had planned it long ago. If you have secured your long-term meal tickets, you will pursue the so-called "true love", and your ex must pay the child support as agreed in the agreement. If you don't give it to me, you will sue you.
Legally, there is no problem at all, but morally, it is indeed difficult for any ordinary person to accept.Many people ask, is there any way to break the deadlock in this situation?
only has this agreement, and it is definitely gone. Your house and the facilities inside have been given to your ex-wife. It is her own business for whom the ex-wife lets come in and live in. As long as the ex-wife and the current one are thick-skinned enough, others can't do anything to them. Just use this online condemnation of returning mattresses, and even ex-wife can make a bargain and fool people. Do you think such a person cares what others say? The benefits are the greatest. How can you bear to throw away such an expensive mattress?
You promised to give so much child support. It doesn’t matter if my remarriage is done. Of course, you can’t change it just by saying it changes. Everything is subject to the agreement.
As for the issue of custody, if it is indeed agreed to be jointly custody, and there is no clear agreement on who the custody belongs to (of course, the mainland cannot agree on this, and it is necessary to clarify who enjoys custody to avoid disputes), you can find a way to fight for this. If there is evidence that the ex-wife is indeed taking drugs or there are other situations that are not suitable for raising children, the issue of custody is hopeless.
What's more, the root of everything lies in custody. As long as the custody is changed, the agreement itself must also be changed accordingly. All the unequal terms signed before will disappear.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-