text | lens
singing and dancing can be said to be the stereotype of Indian movies. Even in the process of watching high-scoring Indian movies, I will still be on tenterhooks, fearing that I will sing and dance again if I don't agree.
With such an uneasy mood, I finished watching the recently popular Indian movie "Enemy" , The key point: dance without any disagreement! ! !
movie adopts double male protagonist mode.
Male protagonist No. 1: Sajan Kumar, Sub-Inspector of Ramanagara Police Station in India
Male protagonist No. 2: Lawyer Aravind
The first 30 minutes: Almost persuaded to quit
Prologue ( Male protagonist No. 2 was sentenced to death by the court Prison) is not directly related to the opening plot, so it is a bit unclear. Although the media tried their best to exaggerate that the case involving male protagonist No. 2 was serious and controversial, it failed to arouse the desire to explore what was committed.
The overwhelming news media reports, the students’ remarks and protests at the female professor’s memorial service, and various signs have created the illusion that the female professor led a revolutionary movement, but it was not made clear. In addition, the overly sensational BGM almost made it almost impossible. Discourage.
30-70 minutes: Getting better
When the male protagonist No. 1 appears, the audience is finally freed from the previous state of confusion.
Male Protagonist No. 1 was ordered to do so in the face of danger. He successfully arrested the suspect despite the huge pressure of public opinion, creating a righteous and awe-inspiring image and gaining public favorability.
's final encounter with shooting directly pushed him to the altar of "national hero".
70-145 minutes: Wonderful
The Human Rights Commission prosecutes the hero No. 1. The hero No. 2 appears as the prosecution lawyer, unraveling the murder case and the story behind the hero No. 1 becoming a "national hero".
first gave a negative review to the defense lawyer. The reason was that he kept paddling and did not put forward a persuasive point of view throughout the process. He also gave assists to the enemy from time to time; he was not professional and rigorous enough in the language processing, and foreshadowed the future. The identity of the country's special prosecutor is not consistent.
Putting aside the rigor of the law, this part of the plot is the highlight of the film. The male protagonist No. 2 slowly raises the doubts in the female professor’s case through several seemingly unrelated cases, and uncovers the story layer by layer. The truth of the case was revealed, which led to a bigger case. The plot of
has been reversed again and again, and the holes dug in the past have been filled in one by one. The plots that were originally unclear have gradually become clear here.
145-160 minutes: superfluous
The last paragraph is about the grudges between the male protagonist No. 2 and the big boss behind the scenes. Although it echoes the beginning and the end, it can be regarded as filling the hole dug by the prologue, but it gives the film a color of revenge. , which narrows the overall structure of the movie and seems to be superfluous.
The film reveals a shocking political conspiracy through the murder of a female university professor, and cleverly connects real-life themes such as gender discrimination, caste discrimination, institutional corruption, and manipulation of public opinion. While the audience praised for its boldness, the truth also surfaced in reversals again and again.
On the whole, it is a very wonderful movie.
Finally, beards, mustaches, black beards, white beards, more beards, less beards...the screen is full of beards, and I can't tell them apart.
