If you want to ask what the real value of cost-effective mobile phones exist? So if you are still confused about the real value of cost-effective mobile phones, then you can think more about the current products of the mobile phone market. After years of development and brand its

It is a pleasure to read articles and listen to music. What kind of comments do you want to hear? (all paid lossless packages)

If you want to ask what real value does a cost-effective mobile phone have? Then the answer may be either simple or complicated, and simplicity and complexity may have only one boundary, "that is, the difference in everyone's cognition level." So if you are still confused about the real value of cost-effective mobile phones, then you can think more about the products of the current mobile phone market. After years of development and brand itself iteration, the cost-effectiveness may no longer be the cost-effectiveness of the original . "Similarly, mid-range phones are not the original mid-range phones, and flagships are not the original flagships." These are all very reasonable.

So with the above views, how should we view the current overall environment of the mobile phone market? is to look at any product from a comprehensive and dialectical perspective again, so that you will not stick to the product's own configuration, parameters, technology, etc. , and truly see through the things behind the product, such as configuration, technology, and parameters, which benefits to users.

In short, the mobile phone market is developing very radical now, and it is also the only criterion for us consumers to look at products calmly, comprehensively and rationally. If you still use the original "buy new but not old, processor theory, high price and low configuration" to view products in the current mobile phone market, then there will undoubtedly be a high chance of buying the wrong one. It's that simple , so I hope everyone knows it.

with the above relatively rational viewpoint, briefly describes the true value of cost-effectiveness.

talks about the real value of cost-effectiveness. we first ask a question "What's wrong with low?" Because more and more people don't like low, we directly ask the question "What's wrong with low?" Just imagine an old saying "The best good is like water, water benefits all things without competing, and treating what everyone hates" and "acting what everyone hates is low". To be honest, cost-effective mobile phones are a low product compared to mid-range phones and flagship phones. Therefore, it is precisely because of low products that cost-effective mobile phones are often looked down upon and looked down upon by people. These are normal phenomena.

But if you think about it a little deeper, is to rethink what is the value of a cost-effective mobile phone from "what is there to be a low level?" In fact, you can clearly find that although is in the low level of cost-effective mobile phone, it is very active in doing all its functions, battery life, and screen "except for the ultimate performance and ultimate functions" are basically very good. Therefore, we can find out why the cost-effective mobile phone is tenacious? In fact, the key to is that it is low, using the cheap price as the basis, and the function experience is not bad, so the audience naturally increases

. Although the flagship is extremely in all aspects, it is slightly higher, so if you really want to buy a flagship, you must hesitate. In addition, the cost-effectiveness is the cheap price and the function experience is comprehensive. Therefore, there are two branches of , "one of which has all the functions and is commonly known as large and complete, and the second is the detailed function experience comparable to the flagship". . This is all caused by the understanding of cost-effective mobile phones by different brands. Just you know it!

So at this moment, if you want to ask what is a cost-effective mobile phone? What is its real value? Then the answer is very simple, that is, "If you look at the cost-effectiveness based on one word, there is no problem." Whether it is large and complete, or the details and functions are comparable to flagships, it is basically inseparable from the word "use".

is like OPPO K10x. Don’t think its price is 1,449 yuan. The corresponding version is 8GB+128GB and it is useless. Indeed, if you look at the phone from the perspective of the "performance processor" in the current environment, then there is no doubt that OPPO K10x is a mobile phone that is not even as good as a salted fish. , but if you focus on "cost-performance ratio", then the core keyword of OPPO K10x is "using", and OPPO is looking at OPPO with the word "using" K10x, then you will understand , and "use only means the "use" of general players, not extreme mobile games or medium mobile games", for this phone, "can almost support the experience of light mobile games", because the screen has a 6.59-inch 120HZ refresh rate, material LCD, and 5000 mAh battery and 67W fast charging in terms of battery life, other functions retain 3.5MM headphone jack

In short, The positioning of this machine is based on the word "use". Never deviate from "use" . Anyway, you will definitely look at it, because humans have a flaw that likes to over-care something . "When you think this thing is a certain level in your heart, but you may start to over-care because of your inner greed, then you will no longer be rational at this moment." , so it is not just about OPPO As long as the K10x phone is priced at around 1,500 yuan, it should be viewed as "used" and don't overly care about some functions. This is right.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------