The quality of cars is always closely related to our lives. After all, no one wants to buy their own car to have problems here and there to be replaced, so of course it can be a little more worry-free. For those who have not really bought a car or want to buy a better quality model, how do we choose the right model? Recently, the car home has given a ranking of model quality, which counts the number of failures of 100 vehicles sold on the market from May 2019 to October 2019, and ranks the models with the lowest number of failures. Through screening, we found that four of the top five models are all from Japanese brands, and the other one is from American brands. What is different from what we believe in our lives is that it is known as the German with reliable quality and excellent craftsmanship. The fact that no model of the series has entered the top ten of the quality list can not help but feel a little surprised. At this point, can we also determine that the failure rate of German cars is indeed worse than that of Japanese cars? After all, the number of failures often represents the quality of this car, so in response to this phenomenon, let's take a look at the top ranked cars.
Quality evaluation data description:
1, the number of failures per 100 vehicles (PPH) represents the average number of problems per 100 new vehicles. The smaller the value, the better the quality.
PPH=The number of problems with the vehicles participating in the evaluation ÷ the number of vehicles participating in the evaluation×100
2. The statistical sample comes from closed invitations to real car owners every month and has been drained many times. The data is calculated once a month, and only the samples within the time range of the relevant application vehicle are included in the calculation (new vehicles 2-12 months, reliability 3-5 years).
3. When the effective sample size of the car is greater than or equal to 30, the PPH will be calculated and participate in the ranking. The list only displays data above the industry average performance.
Chevrolet Cruze
Hundred car breakdowns: 72
As a new car in the field of Chevrolet cars, Cruze is in It was officially launched in March of this year. The price of the new car ranges from RMB 8.99 to RMB 119,900. The main focus is also on young sports. In terms of positioning, Cruze is positioned between Kovoz and Cruze, and is divided into two different versions, Redline and RS. The oversized black air intake grille has great visual impact, and the "golden bow tie" further strengthens its youthful attributes. The interior is still the classic family flying wing design language, which is not very impressive compared to the appearance. However, the black interior color and red stitching emphasizes its youthful positioning in details. The image quality of the 8-inch central control screen is quite satisfactory, with multiple physical buttons at the bottom, which is very convenient for daily use.
In terms of power, Cruze is equipped with 1.0T and 1.3T turbocharged engines, the maximum power is 125 horsepower and 163 horsepower, and the maximum torque is 170 N· Meters and 230 Nm. In terms of transmission system, it is matched with a 6-speed manual gearbox, 6-speed dual-clutch and 6-speed manual transmission. In the quality list given, Cruze ranked 7th with 72 failures per 100 cars, but because it is a new car, the number of failures per 100 cars is very small, and it can wait a long time for sales. Click to continue to observe.
Toyota Highlander
Hundred car failures: 70
Toyota Highlander ranks No. in the quality list Six people, I think no one will be dissatisfied. After all, Toyota's quality is well-known. After so many years of sales in the Chinese market, it has long been unable to extricate itself. Therefore, Highlander's low number of failures is beyond doubt. In terms of product strength, as a benchmark product of this level, the new Highlander still maintains a good competitiveness, and its core competitiveness is comfortable and open space. It would be better if you could perfect some details such as light source and CarPlay. No matter which model it is, there will be a choice that cannot be wrongselect. In the mid-size SUV, Highlander is that role. In terms of dynamics, it doesn't have anything particularly outstanding, but in terms of practicality, Toyota will never disappoint, and this is what makes this Highlander fascinating.
Driving, usually driving it, it does not mobilize too much of your passion, or driving it will not want to be fast, as if you have an extra Family responsibility. Coupled with the best space and practicality in its class, I think Highlander is a very suitable choice for home users, and this just proves why it is so popular.
Mazda CX-5
The number of failures of a hundred cars: 69
The fifth place in the number of failures is Mazda’s CX- 5. According to the statistics of Autohome, the number of failures per 100 vehicles is 69, and the overall result is ahead of Highlander. For the Mazda brand, in fact, many people in China have mixed praises and criticisms. Some people think Mazda is too stubborn. When others use turbos, he is still obsessed with self-priming. This stubborn and love-hate brand is natural. It will also lead to many topics. In addition, it does not do well in terms of space. It does not cater to the Chinese as well as Toyota. This is where many people complain about it. However, in addition to these shortcomings, Mazda has always done a good job in quality. Although it is incomparable with Toyota's rigorous and silky spirit, it is always a car company that is known for its reliable quality, like this list. The Mazda CX-5 has only 69 failures per 100 vehicles, surpassing the Highlander. I think this is enough to justify the world.
For the model, for the power and control of the CX-5, it must be obvious to everyone. The three major parts also have absolute advantages in the level, which is its core Competitiveness. In terms of appearance and configuration, they are also at the mainstream level. Coupled with the iconic dynamic temperament, it makes sense that the CX-5 is popular.
Toyota RAV4 Rongfang
Number of faults in a hundred cars: 67
There is no other way but another model of Toyota comes in List, this car is Toyota's RAV4. The number of failures in a hundred cars is 67. Compared with the latter CX-5, it may not lead too much. However, the competition between the masters is often on these two issues. Toyota has done both of these two issues. Other car companies are so powerful, so this is why it has become the world's largest car company. And seeing the current release of the brand-new RAV4, it feels more public and powerful. The exterior design is much better than the current model. Although it is Toyota, it has the feel of an American SUV. Muscle and youthfulness are its new themes. There are two exhausts, black wheels, and other elements. More pleasing. In terms of price, the price of RMB 174,800 to 258,800 is not low, but it is still a normal level.
The redesigned interior maintains a rugged and public style. The tough lines continue in the car. The center console has a strong sense of hierarchy, clear partitions, and the main color is The black interior color is slightly monotonous, if there are other warm colors, I think it would be better. In terms of power, it is still equipped with a 2.0L naturally aspirated engine and a 2.5L hybrid system, which can meet the National VI emission standards. The fuel version has a maximum power of 171 horsepower and a maximum torque of 209 N·m. The transmission system is matched to simulate 10-speed change. -Speed CVT gearbox; the hybrid version has a front 2 / rear 1 electric motor ratio, the maximum engine power is 178 horsepower, the maximum torque is 221 N·m, and the combined power of the system can reach 222 horsepower after adding the motor, matching E -CVT gearbox. In general, the low failure rate of Toyota RAV4 is mainly due to its excellent product control, and the rigorous spirit of car-making ultimately made Toyota gradually invincible.
Chevrolet Malibu XL
Hundred car breakdowns: 52
The fourth place is Chevrolet Malibu XL, as the top eight Another Chevrolet model in the model, the Malibu XL has only 52 failures per 100 vehicles. Although the market share of American cars in China has been shrinking in recent years, it has to be admitted that these Chevrolet vehicles It is indeed better to build. After removing the root causes of the previous engine and gearbox, Chevrolet's products under the entire brand have gained a good reputation. From Kovoz, Cruze to Malibu XL, Explorer, and Chuangku RS, Chevrolet’s products in recent years seem to have made new breakthroughs in quality, but the prices have become more intimate, so I I think there will be a place for Chevrolet in the future auto market.
Back to this Malibu XL model, the brand-new Malibu XL 550T model can not only give you a visual sense of movement, but also the body feel. In addition, this "heart" comes from Cadillac, the terminal price is less than 200,000, and the price-performance ratio is really unexplainable. So, why does Malibu XL sell better? In fact, in the final analysis, it is because of the improvement of product strength and the further lowering of the body, and this point I think Toyota should really study hard.
third place, Lexus ES
Hundred car breakdowns: 47
The following are the top three quality rankings. The third place is Lexus ES, with 47 failures per 100 vehicles. As Toyota’s high-end luxury brand, Lexus ES ranks third among all models. I think it’s not an exaggeration. After all, Lexus has always given the impression that it has a good reputation for quality and high-quality products, so it should not be reasonable to rank third. Should it be? Otherwise, how can Lexus still have a weak power when it is so expensive? just kidding.
Look at the car model again. Compared with the overseas version, the new ES version of the Chinese version has many special optimizations for Chinese users, such as flowing water LED Turn signal, ANC active noise reduction system, front double-layer noise reduction glass, silent wheels and rear aviation headrests, etc., so it can be seen from here that Lexus's low number of failures is also due to good quality. Otherwise, how can you say it can be sold at such a high price?
Second place, Mazda CX-4
Number of breakdowns of a hundred cars: 42
This second place is again from Mazda One of the family’s models is the CX-4, a special version of Mazda specially built for China. On the quality ranking list, the CX-4 has 42 failures per 100 vehicles, which is lower than the mainstream level of the top ten models. , Also set a new low in the number of failures. For this car, the impression given by the outside world is that the appearance is avant-garde market, the internal space needs to be improved, but the driving experience and experience are excellent, and it is an SUV model suitable for driving. It can be seen from this that consumers recognize the CX-4 car very much. In addition to the widely criticized space, it is basically a state of comprehensive praise, which also shows that this car is highly popular. As for the 42 failures, I think FAW Mazda's quality control is doing well. After all, in a broad sense, 1Maz is still much better than Changan. Therefore, it is normal for the CX-4 to have a low failure count. For
models, the current CX-4 will be undergoing a mid-term facelift soon, and the new car has some upgrades in the exterior and interior. From the styling point of view, CX-4 has a very good appearance, 2.5 power and four-wheel drive form make it have a good performance in vehicle handling. For many young consumers, its overall performance is quite attractive, and moreBesides, the word-of-mouth and quality performance are also very good, so I don't think you have to worry about quality issues after buying CX-4. You can buy with confidence.
First place, Mazda Atez
Hundred car breakdowns: 32
Sorry, first place again It is a model of Mazda family, it is Atez. As a not-so-hot-selling joint venture B-segment car, Artez’s monthly sales volume is only three or four thousand units, but for such a model that seems a bit unpopular, its number of failures is only a mere 32. Surpassed many hot-selling models. In addition, according to the reactions of riders, except for the abnormal noise of a steering gear that needs to be replaced when the steering gear is 60,000 kilometers, the rest of the problem is basically no problem, only normal maintenance is required, so from From these we can see that there is no problem with Atez being the first. In terms of models, if you buy it, you still recommend to buy 2.5L models first. After all, the 2.5L Artez has excellent performance in terms of power, handling and fuel consumption. After driving, you will find that this is a daily test. A medium-sized car that is easy and comfortable to drive, intense and fun.
So overall, I think the Mazda Artz with good-looking appearance, durable interior, enough power and low failure count is worth recommending. It is definitely one A model that will make you love it after driving. Finally, as a fan of Mazda, the elder brother also gives Mazda a suggestion, that is to quickly cause the 2.5T+ rear-wheel drive Atez. If this version of the model arrives, there will be a higher wave of Mazda craze in China. Looking forward to it.
Well, the above are the 8 cars with the lowest failure rate in the past six months. It is worth mentioning that whether it is the top eight or the top ten, the German series are all models No, this can't help but slap those people who boast of good German quality. From the quality ranking of Japanese cars, we can also see that in the segmented models that consumers are most frequently exposed to, Japanese and American cars may be the most recommended and buyable, so how to choose a car within 200,000 ? I think you already have the answer. Finally, I will summarize one sentence: buy Japanese and American products for quality within 200,000 yuan, and buy German products for face within 500,000 yuan. The result is as simple as that. As for whether to buy or not, it is up to you.
Note: The pictures are from the Internet, and the rights belong to the original author. Thanks!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-