A few days ago, Hexun Automobile obtained a suspected recording from the Internet that Tesla pressured on the female owner of the Hainan Model 3 collision accident. The publisher of the recording was previously bought Tesla accidentally used a second-hand car, and finally won the auto blogger who "refunded one compensation three".
In this recording of more than 5 minutes, the female car owner said that contacted her company’s Tesla at the time and indirectly contacted her company’s Tesla Pressure. The female car owner also said that she alone has no relatives in Hainan, and she may "cannot get mixed up" in her real estate industry in the future.
The identity of the person who was talking to the female car owner in the recording is not yet known. The other party said that after the incident, the Tesla related staff in Haikou were also very nervous. Serious hidden danger, don’t you think they don’t panic if you hide so much from the whole country? Their monthly salary is 30,000 or 40,000, and they are scared to death."
At the same time, he believes that the female car owner is "utilized", and that a car is only a Tesla, even if it is returned, there will be no loss, and he said " Musk is the world's richest man. Will he be short of your money? ?" .
At present, Tesla has not responded to this.
March 11, A Tesla Model 3 in Haikou was exposed by the owner. The brake failed and caused an accident. At that time, the speed of was only about 20 kilometers per hour. Subsequently, Tesla after-sales personnel drove another Tesla to the scene to simulate the accident. The vehicle also failed to stop and an accident occurred.
Tesla issued a statement saying that there was no problem with the vehicle. After 's brake pedal was stepped on, the vehicle brake system and ABS were working normally. also posted a vehicle inspection report. Tesla's preliminarily judged that the accident was mainly due to the slippery ground and the lighter braking distance when the owner first stepped on the brake pedal.
But this conclusion aroused strong dissatisfaction from the female car owner, and then issued a "Seven Questions Tesla" to question the authenticity of the background data, inspection report and other content , the incident escalated again, causing concern.
Soon after, the incident reversed again. The female car owner took the initiative to post on Weibo that Tesla could safely stop during the on-site test. recognized Tesla’s test results and was satisfied, and claimed to be Reconciled with Tesla.
According to the settlement agreement circulated on the Internet, Tesla will repurchase this Model 3 at a purchase price of 249,900 yuan, but the female car owner bought insurance for 6,602 yuan and 5,000 yuan for the car film. yuan, totaling RMB 11,602 is borne by the female car owner, as the depreciation cost of for the vehicle .
After the incident, the female car owner issued a follow-up statement stating that the spread of public opinion and the development of the incident were completely unexpected to her . This incident delayed a lot of work. Negotiating with Tesla to buy back the vehicle, and personally bear the depreciation loss, his biggest demand has been achieved. At the same time, she also said that there is no "huge compensation" as everyone said.
If the female car owner’s statement that “Tesla is under pressure through its company leaders” is true, it will surely trigger a new round of escalation.
Hexun Automobile believes that car owners are "forced to reconcile" due to other external factors when they are reasonably and legally defending their rights. This is very unfair to the car owners themselves and other consumers , especially This is the case where Tesla’s various out-of-control accidents have not yet been finalized.
In the future, if Tesla can devote 's time and energy to pressure car owners on how to completely solve "out of control accidents" and on how to improve product quality and service, it will definitely be Win the favor of more consumers.
Take a step back and say that even if the Tesla vehicle itself is really okay, but in the more than 10 accidents since the first out-of-control situation occurred in June last year,Tesla also did not take any effective measures to investigate the accident itself in depth, reduce the probability of "misoperation" by car owners, and add any protective measures to reduce the probability of accidents. Strong7strong, as a car company that it describes as "putting safety first", is obviously unqualified.
.-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-