Although this is the third year of the epidemic, it is more memorable than the first year, because too many bad people and things happened in this year, especially the most despicable and dark things in human nature, which were most truly and fully demonstrated in this year. In a

It’s time to review and summarize again in the year.

I haven’t updated my blog in the past few days, partly due to physical reasons, but mostly because I am in a period of mourning. I would like to observe a few days of silence for my old father-in-law to express my condolences.

In this state of mind, when I look back on my experiences over the past year, it is inevitable that I will have some personal emotions. Before looking back, let me personally define that history will definitely remember the year 2022. Although this is the third year of the epidemic, it is more memorable than the first year, because too many bad people and things happened in this year, especially the most despicable and dark things in human nature, which were most truly and fully demonstrated in this year. In any sense, this year cannot see the progress of history. If you don’t believe it, we can criticize the evidence I established today in a few years.

01

In view of this, let’s talk about the epidemic first. There is an old saying in China that "a major disaster lasts only three years." If we count from December 2019, December this year will be the day when the disaster ends. Theoretically, the disaster, just as it broke out quickly in the beginning, should slowly end this year until it gradually fades out of people's sight.

But this year has been the most difficult year for people across the country in the past three years. Blockade and silence have become hot words. Some cities have been blocked for several months, and the work and life of many people have been completely disrupted. In the face of the epidemic, many places in our country seem to have no other solution except sending a letter. Medical experts are even more funny. Instead of making decisions and assisting government departments in formulating relevant countermeasures, they all strive to be masters of prediction and fortune tellers. For example, Zhang Moumou in Shanghai is a typical example.

html When the epidemic began in Shanghai in April, he promoted the need to liberalize and revitalize the economy. You are a doctor, not an economist, not a government official. The government does not ask you to tell fortunes, but to give you corresponding measures to solve problems after making judgments and suggestions. In hindsight, the so-called research report he made at the time (recently published by Mr. Mingde) mentioned that 98% of people were asymptomatic and no more than 4% had fever. This was a typical act of data fraud. I wonder if such a report is considered a rumor? I think the relevant departments can consider it.

As a conscientious doctor, what he should do at the moment is not only to save lives and heal the wounded, but also to provide necessary emergency measures and suggestions for the government's decision-making. For example, after full liberalization, there will be a run on medical resources and very real problems such as shortages of medicines and supplies. These are all things that experts should consider.

I remember that before the release, the people who were quarantined in the cabin revealed that inside, they only drank water and took a limited number of medicines such as Lianhua Qingwen and Fenbid. In this case, are there any experts who suggest that before the full release, the country should reserve those types of medicines in case of emergencies, just like when the community is under lockdown, major supermarkets prepare dishes in advance. Isn't this suggestion difficult to think of? Also, do experts know how lethal the virus will be to the elderly and related groups after full liberalization? Zhang Moumou, please go to the funeral home and the morgue to see if this is the lethality of a "large cold"? On a cold winter night, before the old man died, he could hardly call 120. Watching the old man pass away quietly, the family was in extreme grief, but their grief soon turned into anxiety, because the old man could not just lie at home like this. Hospital morgues and funeral parlors were overloaded. There are many annoying examples of contacting funerals on the Internet. If you are interested, you can search for the article about "Comrade Li Jianhua." Li Jianhua should be considered a well-known cross talk actor during his lifetime, and had appeared in the Spring Festival Gala many times.

The epidemic is different from the previous two years, mostly because the human nature exposed by the epidemic is different from before. In the past, we sung the praises of angels in white, the rebels, and the volunteers who acted bravely. This year, what we heard was that the street cadres said that the troublemakers would be put into dark rooms; the street cadres put on a show without emotional intelligence and subsequently committed evil; volunteers monopolized the supply of goods in the community, and any non-designated sources of goods entering the community were fined. Of course, there are many, many more.

Regarding the epidemic, as a year-end summary, I don’t think I should post my emotions here, but I hope to use these dark or bad things to see if they can generate some warnings and reminders for the future. After suffering so much, shouldn’t we learn some lessons from the pain?

I think we can at least summarize the following points: First, whether powerful personnel in the country’s public service system should be linked to commercial interests, just like civil servants and employees of many state-owned enterprises cannot hold part-time jobs; some people on the Internet say that Zhang Moumou has the shadow of an American consortium behind him, and that the academician is an executive of several vaccine companies, etc. I have not verified this information, whether it is true or false, at least it should not be true. The second is that all decision-making suggestions should be equipped with necessary emergency measures, such as the supply of dishes during the lockdown and the reserve of medical resources after the lockdown is lifted; the third is how to effectively supervise power, even if it is a trivial power. Some people joke that the people who can't stand it the most after the lockdown is lifted are the security guards, because they are the ones who feel the most disappointed after the lockdown is lifted. The joke may be extreme, but the way the director of the subdistrict office can put residents into a dark room at every turn is absolutely ugly, perverted, and illegal.

Fourth, grassroots social managers should be close to residents and society. I used to think that they were extensions of government agencies, but now I see that this is a mistake in role positioning. If they live among the people but do not represent the people, they will end up like rats in the bellows, suffering from both sides. Maybe some people will degenerate into vicious dogs and litigators, and are incompatible with the people. Fifth, popularizing scientific knowledge to the people is more important than promoting vaccines. Who can tell now whether vaccines are effective? After recovering from the virus after three injections, do I need to get a fourth injection? This needs to be studied scientifically, and hopefully it will not become a forced apportionment like before.

(To be continued...)